DisgruntledHawkFan
Blackhawk Down
I'd love Eklund or Aitcheson.pull that trigger without hesitation. at #9 I would be fine with O'Brien, Eklund or Aitcheson
I'd love Eklund or Aitcheson.pull that trigger without hesitation. at #9 I would be fine with O'Brien, Eklund or Aitcheson
Does Peterka play with Bedard or Nazar?No but I've loved Peterka for years. I still see Reichel having similar upside even if it's a much longer shot.
We've got a PP so the answer is just yes. 5v5 I think he'd be a better fit with Nazar though.Does Peterka play with Bedard or Nazar?
No but I've loved Peterka for years. I still see Reichel having similar upside even if it's a much longer shot.
Except Reichel is so much more talented than Kruger from a skill point it makes your argument fruitless.Peterka has been just under 30 goals the last two years. I know you prefaced it as being a "much longer shot," but I think Reichel needs a change of scenery or to completely revamp his game like Marcus Kruger did to stick with this organization and in the NHL in general. He's been given the leeway he has so far because he's a first-round pick. Might sound crazy, but his path to sticking in the NHL might be going all-in on being a checking guy where if he does score, it's found money.
We just have to face the face that Reichel is not an offensive threat, and especially not a goal scorer. He's had an ample amount of opportunity to play in the top-six and other situations. The end result is he has 20 goals in 169 regular season hockey games.
As long as he's a Blackhawk, I'm rooting for him to be successful. However, no matter what they've tried, it hasn't worked. They've tried him on every line, and Maroon took him under his wing. No matter what's been tried, there has been no consistent production, and he was even late to a meeting and got scratched for that among his bad play the majority of his career.
Does Peterka play with Bedard or Nazar?
let it go, manNo but I've loved Peterka for years. I still see Reichel having similar upside even if it's a much longer shot.
Ian Mitchell?let it go, man
There's no doubt Reichel's offensive ceiling is better than Kruger's ever was. Kruger played almost exclusively fourth line and would average a goal every 13-14 games. Reichel has been given an abundance of opportunity across all lines and is only potting one every 8-9 games.Except Reichel is so much more talented than Kruger from a skill point it makes your argument fruitless.
Reichel is going to start scoring or he's not going to stick in the NHL until he's thirty. Either or.
Maroon took him under his wing? Maroon is the antithesis of Reichel. Square peg round hole.
I 100% think he's in his own head. He looked like a game breaker his rookie year and has had LuRich pound into his head a fourth line game since.There's no doubt Reichel's offensive ceiling is better than Kruger's ever was. Kruger played almost exclusively fourth line and would average a goal every 13-14 games. Reichel has been given an abundance of opportunity across all lines and is only potting one every 8-9 games.
Honest question: do you think Reichel is just snakebit, or do you think he's just unable to finish? I can't sit here with a straight face and say this organization has managed is development to the best of their ability, but at what point do we just admit it was a missed pick and he'd probably be better off with a change of scenery?
I'm not going to be furious if he is on the roster by any means, but my expectations are very, very miniscule for him.
I truly think that if you get Bedard a space creator with skill in his own right, that could really open up the floodgates for his production. A guy that can play the net-front on the power play, go into the corners, and let Bedard walk into high-danger parts of the ice could be huge for us. You don't draft someone for the sake of another player, but I really think what Bedard brings and what someone of that ilk could bring could really compliment each other.
Based on that, it would come across that I lean Martone. I am pretty open-minded. I would take Misa in a heartbeat because his skill is undeniable. Hard to imagine we get him without having to make a trade or the Islanders out-smarting themselves. I think Hagens could end up a good player, but I don't think he's Misa-level and he's 5'11". Frondell is a bit of a wild card because I think he has a lower ceiling, or a higher floor. He screams responsible center with skill. You have to hope for a Barkov-lite if that's your justification for picking a guy like that third.
Get me someone who is physical, hard to knock off the puck, and has enough skill to finish in tight and win those battles.
Yes.
Lakovic really is just too soft for me. I just don't find it inspiring to watch someone 6'4" get bullied by guys half his size.
Read on X that Chicago wants Frodell and Eklund. It would be great to walk away with both
Not real. That rumor came from a fake Frank Seravalli account. The exact reason verified social media accounts are so important.Read on X that Chicago wants Frodell and Eklund. It would be great to walk away with both
Strome has elite IQ. Very high end playmaker.... since when? Strome? Dach?