2025 NHL DRAFT Thread | Page 205 | HFBoards - NHL Message Board and Forum for National Hockey League

2025 NHL DRAFT Thread

Who should we pick 3rd overall (assuming Schaefer and Misa are gone)?


  • Total voters
    118
127 players had 50 points this year. Phillip f***ing Kurashev scored 50 playing with a rookie Bedard last year on a team that never touched the puck. You guys are kind of nuts with your ceiling projections.
Is that more ridiculous than saying a guy can ride a player's coat tails to a P/GP when only 36 players achieved that this season?
 
Is that more ridiculous than saying a guy can ride a player's coat tails to a P/GP when only 36 players achieved that this season?
Yes. Comfortably more ridiculous. I'm not even saying there's no world where Desnoyers doesn't top out as a 50 point player but putting that low of a ceiling on any forward prospect who is getting serious top 5 consideration from NHL scouts is pure hallucination.
 
127 players had 50 points this year. Phillip f***ing Kurashev scored 50 playing with a rookie Bedard last year on a team that never touched the puck. You guys are kind of nuts with your ceiling projections.

I don't get what Kurashev being a one-year wonder has to do with Desnoyer's projection. Do you think Kurashev is a 50-point wing? No. Maybe Desnoyers has a season or two where he's more than a 50-point centrte. Would you qualify him as being more than that if every other year that's what he is?

Tyler Arnason scored 50+ in the league when scoring was way down. So did Kyle Calder. They were tweener players that never replicated those seasons. Aberrations happen.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RememberTheRoar
Yes. Comfortably more ridiculous. I'm not even saying there's no world where Desnoyers doesn't top out as a 50 point player but putting that low of a ceiling on any forward prospect who is getting serious top 5 consideration from NHL scouts is pure hallucination.
So, saying a completely unflashy kid stands a good chance to be someone who tops out roughly around a team's 4th best scoring forward is "comfortably more ridiculous" than projecting him to be in the company that annually includes about one player per team? Gotcha.
 
I don't get what Kurashev being a one-year wonder has to do with Desnoyer's projection. Do you think Kurashev is a 50-point wing? No. Maybe Desnoyers has a season or two where he's more than a 50-point centrte. Would you qualify him as being more than that if every other year that's what he is?

Tyler Arnason scored 50+ in the league when scoring was way down. So did Kyle Calder. They were tweener players that never replicated those seasons. Aberrations happen.
There's no misunderstanding about what you mean by a 50 point player. The point is you're placing it as an upper limit and it's an extremely easily achievable point total that yes, even tweener bums can accidentally run into now and then. Even if you were saying it as a median outcome it would still be low for how scouts see the player. It's pure smoke.
 
So, saying a completely unflashy kid stands a good chance to be someone who tops out roughly around a team's 4th best scoring forward is "comfortably more ridiculous" than projecting him to be in the company that annually includes about one player per team? Gotcha.
A ceiling isn't a "good chance to top out at". It's a best-case scenario.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HawksDub89
And "tops out at" isn't the same as ceiling? Arguing (the wrong phrase) to argue at this point.
No, it should be self-evident that a player's ultimate realized outcome (aka what they top out at) isn't the same as their projectable ceiling at the time they are drafted. Desnoyers has a ceiling as something like a 30g 45a Selke candidate guy. That's the dream when you draft him even if it's not what you expect as the most likely outcome. When you say a player has a 50 point ceiling, it's akin to saying there isn't a realistic development scenario where they regularly produce more than that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LavalPhantom
I see Desnoyers as a consistent 50-60 point player, while being great defensively and on faceoffs. Maybe a few seasons at 70+ but mostly 50-60s.
 
would be funny if there is all this debate about Desnoyers and they just take Hagens...the sportsbooks have Frondell and Hagens as pretty significant favorites over Martone and Desnoyers
 
I dont even think Desnoyers is 6'2, he doesn't look it to me. I know what hockeydb and eliteprospects say but Bob Mckenzie has him at 6'0.5" here which feels a lot more accurate to me

Desnoyers will fall if he shrinks at the combine
 
would be funny if there is all this debate about Desnoyers and they just take Hagens...the sportsbooks have Frondell and Hagens as pretty significant favorites over Martone and Desnoyers
In many ways Hagens makes a lot of sense because the Hawks love their college program kids

I'd certainly like him more than Des or Frondell
 
  • Like
Reactions: Toews2Bickell
In many ways Hagens makes a lot of sense because the Hawks love their college program kids

I'd certainly like him more than Des or Frondell
right now the betting market seems to have a ~20% chance of Hagens to NYI and a ~20% of Misa to Chicago as a result, but if they go with Schaefer then the market seems to have it around 30/30/20/20 atm for Frondell, Hagens, Martone, Desnoyers in that order...Frondell is a slight favorite over Hagens, but Hagens is a big favorite over Desnoyers according to the market which is interesting given the narrative around Desnoyers and how pundits seem to talk about him having far higher odds of being the pick than the market implies atm
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: LavalPhantom
I dont even think Desnoyers is 6'2, he doesn't look it to me. I know what hockeydb and eliteprospects say but Bob Mckenzie has him at 6'0.5" here which feels a lot more accurate to me

Height in a vacuum is meaningless, Korchinski is 6'2 and think it would be consensus that he's been overmatched during his NHL stints, build matters a lot...if Desnoyers was 6'0 175 would people talk about him in the same light as being 6'2 175, or would that size narrative between him and Hagens start to disappear a bit
 
Height in a vacuum is meaningless, Korchinski is 6'2 and think it would be consensus that he's been overmatched during his NHL stints, build matters a lot...if Desnoyers was 6'0 175 would people talk about him in the same light as being 6'2 175, or would that size narrative between him and Hagens start to disappear a bit
I think at 6'2 that size in considered an asset/plus as a two way centremen, at a shade over 6 foot I think that narrative goes away and his stock probably takes a bit of a hit. Does it actually make a difference? I mean that ~2 inch difference is pretty large, imagine 6'2 vs 6'4 where 6'4 is considered borderline huge for a forward

Gonna be interesting to see how he measures considering how slim the margins seem to be
 
Last edited:
I think the ceiling for Hagens is Clayton Keller level
yes, I would agree with that.

guy can flat out produce offence at the US national program and was a point per game in college last year.

if the hawks want the guy with the highest ceiling that is not named Shaefer and Misa then Hagens is likely that guy.
 
He was 1.5 ppg this season. Did he play PP at the u18s? He has developed considerably since then anyway. Again, I’m talking about total swimming in Bedards wake 70-90 as a ceiling.
He plays in the Q on a stacked team. He didn’t even play well when he was paired with McKenna for Canada
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Ad

Ad