Kevin Musto
Hard for Bedard
- Feb 16, 2018
- 21,745
- 31,519
irrelevant
irrelevant
No, Kotkaniemi is like a 25 point player. He’s legitimately terrible.so it would be Kotkaniemi at 3rd overall basically
I haven’t heard any concerns about his hockey sense but I have heard concerns over his lack of creativity and his skating which isn’t elite. Basically, the concerns are that he’s not super flashy.The concerns that I keep seeing online about Frondell all stem from his hockey sense; play recognition, playmaking, etc. I can't recall a player who was physically gifted with questionable hockey sense having their projection take off after being drafted. I can think of a lot of guys who teams would regret drafting as high as they did based on the tools without the brain.
He averages 33 points per 82 games with 13:40 ice time. He’s a 3C basically. Also an above 50% faceoff guy. Not 3rd overall quality but not terrible. He’s basically what a lot of people thought he’d be.No, Kotkaniemi is like a 25 point player. He’s legitimately terrible.
At 3, I think all of these players lumped together have 2nd line potential. In his draft, it was baffling he got picked over Tkachuk, Hughes, Dobson, Bouchard etc.
I haven’t heard any concerns about his hockey sense but I have heard concerns over his lack of creativity and his skating which isn’t elite. Basically, the concerns are that he’s not super flashy.
Should they take a flyer on Ivan Ryabkin with one of their later picks? Read somewhere that Ryabkin was considered as good as or an even better prospect than Demidov before the former's disastrous last season in Russia, and his scoring has returned since moving over to the USHL.
Kyle Davidson doesn't have a plan, and that in itself is the problem.
Two years in a row one of the worst teams in hockey begs to differ.Not true at all.
He blew it all up in 2022 (should have happened after we got waxed by Nashville)... Our farm system was like mother Hubbard's cupboard.Not true at all.
Whatever you say "ConnorBedardisbest"That he would be a better pro then Bedard, which may be true considering I never bought into the Bedard hype that strong and his current progression in the nhl is more top line player on a bad team then franchise savior, Hagens is better then both.
I think Hagens goes first."If Hagens is there at three (I don't think he will be)"
So it goes....Schaefer and Hagens .....then Misa ?
Misa falling the the Hawks wouldn't be so bad would it ?
Are you getting concerned with the Yzerplan after your Wings got stuck in the mud this year and your captain expressed discontent feelings over lack of big TDL move?Two years in a row one of the worst teams in hockey begs to differ.
If anybody is in that whole "they're losing on purpose for high draft picks" camp when there's grown ass men playing on that team I have a bridge I'd like to sell you.
What's the tally currently on head coaches?
It's 2025, this team can't even figure out how to get their team on cable but the useless gm has a plan?
Are you getting concerned with the Yzerplan after your Wings got stuck in the mud this year and your captain expressed discontent feelings over lack of big TDL move?
West is a longshot project. 64 is the earliest you start to look at a player like that.Mason West has reportedly decided to commit to hockey over football. Should be firmly in play for the Blackhawks at 25 or 34 imo.
Post proof I post on the Wings forum.Are you getting concerned with the Yzerplan after your Wings got stuck in the mud this year and your captain expressed discontent feelings over lack of big TDL move?
Last years picks Pridham and Henry are like that.West is a longshot project. 64 is the earliest you start to look at a player like that.
You're basically teaching an athlete how to play hockey. He's a physical specimen, but he's way behind his peers.
That is something the Hawks like, but at 25 and 34, you're cleaning up quality fallers. Not the place to jump the gun.
As I said in the text you quoted, "that is something the Hawks like"Last years picks Pridham and Henry are like that.
I certainly don't have opinions on everyone.Idk how anyone who is not a scout has the time to watch as much hockey as Musto claims he does. He has an opinion on everyone.
I just meant that you're potentially drafting a player with a below average offensive ceiling in the top 3. The Hawks liked Kotkaniemi that year but he rose up the boards because he was one of the few centers projected to go that high iircNo, Kotkaniemi is like a 25 point player. He’s legitimately terrible.
At 3, I think all of these players lumped together have 2nd line potential. In his draft, it was baffling he got picked over Tkachuk, Hughes, Dobson, Bouchard etc.