2025 NHL DRAFT Thread

Who should we pick 3rd overall (assuming Schaefer and Misa are gone)?


  • Total voters
    78
  • Total words: 1,660 words
  • Total misspellings (including obvious typos): 67
  • Percentage of typos: ~4%

O'Brien has a long runway as a relatively young June 2007 birthdate, plus he played only on the second line (2C), though on PP1 for Brantford. Still, considering his younger age, he's not yet filling out his big 6'2" frame. With his elite hockey IQ and playmaking skill, you can say he has barely scratched the surface. He will really take off next season as the #1C and should add more 5x5 scoring to his already lethal production on the POs.

Would like to see more explosion in his skating, still, even as he did improve his skating over the course of this past season. Would like to see better reads defensively, but again, that longer runway. So, if you add all that up—that he's not yet as close to a finished product as Misa or the plateau level of the older guys, Martone or Hagens—then you have to consider the projection trajectory for O'Brien. His ceiling may be higher than anyone except maybe Misa up front.

Frondell just does not have the speed or the puck-carrying ability required that the Hawks need. He just failed miserably at U18s. Canada then stymied him easily. Just not impressed at all by him.

Brady Martin is the unique standout of this draft in several categories that the Hawks lack too: Uber-competitiveness, uber-physicality, and the best hitter in the draft. Viewing scout reports and highlights from the OHL, he has a terrific pro shot, can pick corners, and has a wicked hard one-timer.

Creates tons of scoring chances off the forecheck and offensive zone battles, then rushes. Can power through and past checks with speed and strength. Will only get stronger. Good 200-ft player. Can take it to the net. Can play C.

Maybe not an elite passer, but decent. He did not have much talent help in the Soo (a team that finished 14th out of 20 OHL teams in league standings). The question, given this context, is how many more goals and assists would he have had if he played on the top line in Moncton (top team in the Q), or if he played on the top line with Lardis in Brantford? Or if he played on the top line in London? Or even played with just a decent team with more help like Martone had in Brampton or Misa had in Saginaw?

You have to ask the "what if" question for Brady Martin, given he was pretty much all alone and the best player on such a bottom-level OHL team.

I do not know if he has a higher ceiling from more development, but the level he already plays at for compete, work ethic, and physicality is off the charts. Coupled with his pro shot and at least average passing skill, plus 200-ft 2-way play, the level he plays at screams NHL pro. You want this guy in your top six forwards if for no other reason than the work example he will set for the other five—insuring them, teaching them to want it more. He also will act as a deterrent if the opposition wishes to take liberties on our smaller skilled forwards like Bedard and Nazar.

This is why Martin ought to be considered for the #3 spot.

He can't be a "bad fit." He will be a great fit for any team taking him.

In my books, forget the rankings.

The Hawks do not need Hagens to add to the shrimp list. The Hawks do not need the slow pace of Martone or the slow skating of Frondell.

So it comes down to, for me, either trade up to land Misa or add one of three different types of centers: the 6'2" Desnoyers, the 6'0" Martin who already plays a bigger man’s game, or bet on the upside yet to come from Jake O'Brien, who gets an even bigger role next season in Brantford as their 1C.

These are the three best fits for the Hawks after Misa. But look, even Misa has some concerns. That -16 he posted in his final 10 GP is an issue to me. Did he burn out? Get banged up and play through an injury? If not, then even Misa has some risks.

If KD still has Hagens, Frondell, or Martone higher on his "list," he needs to ask himself: what does Hagens or Frondell bring to the Hawks' needs exactly? If this is just a fuzzy "talent" opinion, then he must fire his scouts, because I just do not buy it. Nobody is even close to Martin in physicality or relentless work ethic. Those are talents too.

The skating, vision, and defensive prowess of Desnoyers are all talent and skill too, but less flawed than Hagens or Martone in certain aspects of concern. O'Brien has elite passing/playmaking skill, but he’s not fully developed physically or in certain aspects. He has time and runway to get better in those areas. You bet on further upside.

The long bus ride, differing timelines and levels of development, differing questions of whether a player is plateaued or much more is coming, differing circumstances—played in privileged situations versus played on a poor team or in a secondary role but will be in a top-line role next season—all these differences (body size and type, style of play, skating, starts, power, and all of these differing aspects) have to be considered.

This is not some consensus or easy ranking after Misa goes off the board.

Hagens underachieved given his hype and his privileged situation at BC.

Martone...overachieved given his poor situation on a bad team. He only got better as the season went on. Kept rising. Shone at U18s. Is going to make a huge impact in 5x5. If he gets better with more PP talent to play with, then you get something terrific.

Defense to offense—the way Desnoyers plays—just add weight and more strength to his lanky 6'2" frame.

O'Brien...again, needs to add bulk to his 6'2" frame, add a bit more explosion to his skating, and get a bit better in defensive zone reads. But given his relative youth, you expect him to take off into the stratosphere next season in Brantford. Certainly not NHL-ready. Has not yet reached his junior ceiling.

I am not sure Hagens or Martone get any better. They are old for this draft (2006 birthdates), and while their production may be higher this season in college or junior respectively, I do not see where they add much more talent than their level already.

Desnoyers and O'Brien, I do see getting to a higher level. Martin will get better merely playing with better talent. When he got that chance at the OHL Top Prospects Challenge or at the W-U18s, he shone and greatly impacted games when all the scouts' eyes were on him in those heightened levels of competition.
 
Nobody ever said that.

Martone is my BPA.

Though I would take Potter over Hagens.


You literally said Cullen Potter at 3 would be fine by you, meaning you'd be fine with Potter over Martone or Hagens.
 

You literally said Cullen Potter at 3 would be fine by you, meaning you'd be fine with Potter over Martone or Hagens.
That's correct.

None of these statements contradict each other.
 
Go back to jerking off Frondell

Says the guy that sucks off Ian Mitchell, Dylan Strome etc. like no tomorrow. You act like only your opinion is what matters when in reality you lie, make up stuff and exaggerate other prospects deficiencys just to try making "your guys" look better.

I'm fine with what ever prospect Hawks draft, they do this thing for living and I bet they know a lot more than some random guys on a message board.

Sure its fun looking for videos and scouting reports, maybe even talk about them on message board. But that is a far cry of actually being a professional scout and acting like you know better!

Sorry Pez, had to use exclamation mark 😉
 
Hagens is like a snail compared to Potter

So to be clear, you think Potter is a more dynamic player because he has better straight line speed? So what about Hagens -- who is a very good skater in his own right -- having better hands, being more deceptive and a better manipulator of his opponents? Was Viktor Stalberg a more dynamic player than Patrick Kane?

That must be why Hagens lead the u18s in scoring last year with 22 points while Potter was tied for 3rd on the US team this year with 8 points.
 
I understand the hatred for Musto’s antics but I appreciate the comments he gives. Even if it means reading through the lines a bit.

He liked Moore, a lot of the NHL liked Moore. Moore is still a decent player.

He liked Nazar a lot pre-draft. He liked Peter Reynolds too but cmon. We’re all casuals. Atleast allows you to go back and watch Potter again and see if you see what he does. I find it fun to read his posts. Gotta be a little less serious sometimes.
 
I've seen Potter play live down the road at the Mullet three times (on top of nearly every ASU broadcast) . He's a tremendously gifted athlete with some huge holes in his game that I don't think he'll ever fill. If he does find his finish while simultaniously upping his IQ and strength on the puck he could be a Hagel-type player because the wheels and hands are legit. His tendency to overhandle, dangle and create opportunities the other way is troubling and must be reigned in. He has tunnel vision and goes superhero mode too often - especially for a guy who is easily bullied off the puck.
 
  • Like
Reactions: clydesdale line
How much of the Frondell love is because of him playing against men as one of the youngest guys in the draft, and how much is his actual play and skill? If you buy the projections that he ends up that two way C that everyone regrets passing on I can get it a little bit, but I'm not sure projecting so hard at 3 is a wise move. I think you leave that to the teams outside of the top 5, but that's just me.

I did not see the high end skills at the U18. Those things usually flash hard against peers in those tournaments, even if a player is off. The shot and size showed up, but his game didn't stand out to me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Muffinalt
I understand the hatred for Musto’s antics but I appreciate the comments he gives. Even if it means reading through the lines a bit.
i think the problem is he loves his guys, feels very hurt when others don't, and has been burned several times by his guys not panning out, so he reflects those feelings back out on prospects he doesn't like and the people who do. whatever positive contribution he has to offer is drowned out by that base insecurity. that's what necessitates "reading through the lines".
Gotta be a little less serious sometimes.
there are some people i take seriously in this world. i know none of them through the internet.
 
i think the problem is he loves his guys, feels very hurt when others don't, and has been burned several times by his guys not panning out, so he reflects those feelings back out on prospects he doesn't like and the people who do. whatever positive contribution he has to offer is drowned out by that base insecurity. that's what necessitates "reading through the lines".

there are some people i take seriously in this world. i know none of them through the internet.
Wah wah wah. Not everything has to be taken literally. Some of you just fall for his antics too often
 
  • Like
Reactions: Muffinalt
The statement contradicts you saying you never said you'd take Potter over Martone or Hagens. Saying you'd be fine with Potter at 3 (over those players), means you're fine taking Potter over them.
I don't know how to be any clearer.

Martone is my BPA (assuming Schaefer and Misa are gone) at 3.

Just because he's my BPA, doesn't mean he's the only player I would like at 3.

Potter and Aitchison are guys I like there too. I'm more than fine with taking them over Martone.

I can live with Hagens or Desnoyers.
If you remember, Musto was in love with Moore as well.
Moore has been good. What's wrong with Moore?
I've seen Potter play live down the road at the Mullet three times (on top of nearly every ASU broadcast) . He's a tremendously gifted athlete with some huge holes in his game that I don't think he'll ever fill. If he does find his finish while simultaniously upping his IQ and strength on the puck he could be a Hagel-type player because the wheels and hands are legit. His tendency to overhandle, dangle and create opportunities the other way is troubling and must be reigned in. He has tunnel vision and goes superhero mode too often - especially for a guy who is easily bullied off the puck.
I don't disagree with your criticisms.

The difference is I think he can fill those holes.

And if he does, as you said, he could be like Hagel.

If you knew you could grab 90 point Brandon Hagel at 3rd overall, would you take him? I know I would.

18 year olds aren't finished products. You have to project where they could be in 5 years and Potter has an exciting projection. Most guys in this class have very safe and boring projections. Other guys in this draft don't even have the ability to go superhero mode. Schaefer is probably the only other one that can. Why punish Potter because he's able to do something special? He needs to work on it, but it shows promise.
 
I don't know how to be any clearer.

Martone is my BPA (assuming Schaefer and Misa are gone) at 3.

Just because he's my BPA, doesn't mean he's the only player I would like at 3.

Potter and Aitchison are guys I like there too. I'm more than fine with taking them over Martone.

I can live with Hagens or Desnoyers.

Moore has been good. What's wrong with Moore?

I don't disagree with your criticisms.

The difference is I think he can fill those holes.

And if he does, as you said, he could be like Hagel.

If you knew you could grab 90 point Brandon Hagel at 3rd overall, would you take him? I know I would.

18 year olds aren't finished products. You have to project where they could be in 5 years and Potter has an exciting projection. Most guys in this class have very safe and boring projections. Other guys in this draft don't even have the ability to go superhero mode. Schaefer is probably the only other one that can. Why punish Potter because he's able to do something special? He needs to work on it, but it shows promise.
It's a fair question, but there's a reason he is by and large not being talked about in the top half of the draft. The gap in those loops he needs to close compared to other players' deficiencies is far, far greater than the other guys locked into the top 10. Martone's skating is concerning, Potter's lack of awareness, inability to win tough ice and poor decisions is frightening.
 
I understand the hatred for Musto’s antics but I appreciate the comments he gives. Even if it means reading through the lines a bit.

He liked Moore, a lot of the NHL liked Moore. Moore is still a decent player.

He liked Nazar a lot pre-draft. He liked Peter Reynolds too but cmon. We’re all casuals. Atleast allows you to go back and watch Potter again and see if you see what he does. I find it fun to read his posts. Gotta be a little less serious sometimes.
Whether or not Musto loves a player is fine when it comes to the outlandish and crack head claims like Drafting Cristall in the top 5

Drafting a Dman that isn’t Schaefer at 3

Drafting Marat Whonutsdinov at 3 in 2019 is where it is fair game since those are some outlandish ass takes even for this site
 
  • Like
Reactions: TheFridge
I see everyone talking about trading down, what about trading up? Give up 3 and 29 for 2? Is that not enough? Then hell give them 34. We’ve got tons of guys in that range already, Boisvert, Vanacker, Greene, Ludwinski, Savoie, Hayes, Kantserov, and others. You know what we don’t have? A running mate for Bedard
 
If Musto could admit he was wrong I would take him more seriously. He couldn’t have been more wrong on Vlasic and when brought up he just ignores it like it never happened.

If you want to be so adamant about your guys, you have to own the misses too. He doesn’t do that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HawksDub89
I would freaking love to trade down to get the worst player of Hagens Desnoyers Frondell and Martone. I guess that’s the 6th pick? Philly? Gimme Foerester 6 and Colorado first for 3.

Then I’m packaging Toronto, Colorado 1stand some seconds to climb back up.
 
If Musto could admit he was wrong I would take him more seriously. He couldn’t have been more wrong on Vlasic and when brought up he just ignores it like it never happened.

If you want to be so adamant about your guys, you have to own the misses too. He doesn’t do that.
That has never been ignored. I've admitted to being wrong about Vlasic numerous times.

Even made a whole thread about it.
 
I would freaking love to trade down to get the worst player of Hagens Desnoyers Frondell and Martone. I guess that’s the 6th pick? Philly? Gimme Foerester 6 and Colorado first for 3.

Then I’m packaging Toronto, Colorado 1stand some seconds to climb back up.
Foerster is kind of a PP merchant

Always has been
 
If Musto could admit he was wrong I would take him more seriously. He couldn’t have been more wrong on Vlasic and when brought up he just ignores it like it never happened.

If you want to be so adamant about your guys, you have to own the misses too. He doesn’t do that.
He has admitted he was wrong in the past to be honest. I would stop responding to people after a while if they were still ribbing me about it myself.

He is a bit much at times, but I just consider it comic relief.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest posts

Ad

Ad