Mjul Qvist
Registered User
- Nov 28, 2009
- 72
- 232
and how's that working out for Anaheim?
Too early to tell.
and how's that working out for Anaheim?
Nothing any of us posts matters. You're going to have to get past that if you want to enjoy an internet hockey forum.That´s what I think. If Hawks pick 1st or 2nd they´ll take Schaefer or Misa. If the pick is 3rd or 4th there there are more options to go with.
It doesn´t matter what we think or would do. Last year there were probably many who thought Sennecke shouldn´t go top three and he did. We like to vision players what they´ll become based on more our fiction than knowledge. In this years draft class Desnoyers and Frondell are considered as top 5 talents by many. And it´s really hard to compare players when they are playing in different leagues. Catton might not survive in Allsvenskan but is doing really strong in juniors.
They don't really exist.
Schaefer has game breaking upside, but he's been out of comission so long that we're all just guessing based on a small but top notch sample size.
After that, I don't know if anyone screams elite.
You can find elite attributes, but they come with flaws. Like Martone has elite IQ, but his skating is below NHL average.
And that's basically the story of this draft. "He's great at this, but..."
Desnoyers leading playoffs in scoring with 20 points in 9 games 6 ahead of the next scorer.He seems to be improving in every aspect of his game and just turned 18.Has filled out a bit to 180 as well.If we are at 3 he should be the pick.Toews went 3rd and that worked out pretty well.Desnoyers plays mean he and Boisvert on a line could become a tough line to play against down the road.
Nothing any of us posts matters. You're going to have to get past that if you want to enjoy an internet hockey forum.
Mustos take on Desnoyers isn’t as ridiculous as some of you are making it. You can like the player and also be rational about what the ceiling will likely be.
You are right and I am enjoying myself here.
It´s not but predicting ceiling isn´t spot on thing even from professional scouts.
I wouldn't take him top ten but on talent alone he's easily a top five skill set.We can all agree that McQueen is too much of a risk that outside of him falling dramatically to Leafs pick he should not even be on Hawks radar, right?
I agree with that order. If The Blackhawks drop to 3 or 4 I can groove with either Hagens or Martone. Misa is my number one guy but if Chicago gets the 1st and take Schaefer I won't be to upset with that.Schaefer - Misa - Hagens - Martone in thar order for me. Whole bunch of guys I like at five but I haven't been able to watch as much as I usually do with the coma.
what do i need this for? fiddy already ran the simulations.![]()
2025 NHL Draft Lottery Odds
Here's the full breakdown of all 16 teams' odds for the 2025 NHL draft lottery.www.prohockeyrumors.com
Add Samuel Savoie to Desnoyers & Boisvert and we have the Chicago version of : Big , gritty , talented trioDesnoyers leading playoffs in scoring with 20 points in 9 games 6 ahead of the next scorer.He seems to be improving in every aspect of his game and just turned 18.Has filled out a bit to 180 as well.If we are at 3 he should be the pick.Toews went 3rd and that worked out pretty well.Desnoyers plays mean he and Boisvert on a line could become a tough line to play against down the road.
Grant McCagg disagrees with you on Desnoyers & FrondellWhy?
I've been respectful this whole time, and nothing I've said is unreasonable. Most scouts will tell you the same thing. I don't even have a unique opinion here.
I don't dislike the player at all.
I just think it's not a good pick at 3 or 4 because you're leaving too much upside on the board.
Kudos to you. You've been on the Misa hype train all year, even when Hagens was the clear front runner for the forwards.Schaefer - Misa - Hagens - Martone in thar order for me. Whole bunch of guys I like at five but I haven't been able to watch as much as I usually do with the coma.