Pez68
Registered User
Delusion.I love how I talk about there being a log jam upcoming (and one impacting Isaak) and THEN Phillips is dealt AND hawk beat reporters express a similar concern afterward AND I'm out of touch?
Delusion.I love how I talk about there being a log jam upcoming (and one impacting Isaak) and THEN Phillips is dealt AND hawk beat reporters express a similar concern afterward AND I'm out of touch?
Hawks won cups with out of position Sharp, Michal Handzus and Old man Brad Richards as nominally second line centers. Any “one size fits all” declaration is dumb. Sometimes you are stretching the definition of “elite” at which point you could point many great wingers those teams has too. Could say same about elite high end number 1 Defenseman. Do hawks have one right now? But the hawks have drafted a lot of kids with center experience in excess picks.Leafs never won because their forwards are overrated and Matthews is more concerned about squeezing the last dollar of his team's cap every 3 years than actually winning. It is honestly amazing he doesnt get more heat for his contract shenangins.
Oilers went to game 7 of the finals last year any sane person would argue a starting goalie was 1000% a bigger issue than their defense.
Should we talk about all the success Nashville had with their 4 top pairing Dmen the last 20 years? Afterall how could a team that at one point had Timonen, Weber, Suter, Josi, Ellis, Ekholm, Jones, Subban, among others not win? Must have been one big problem front and center with those teams... How about that they lost to a Pittsburgh team who didnt even have a top pairing D in 2017?
Elite center depth > everything else.
Crosby-Malkin, Kopitar-Carter, Bergeron-Krejci (could have been Savard too if Matt Cooke wasnt a prick), Stamkos-Point, ROR-Schenn, Backstrom-Kuznetsov, MacKinnon-Kadri, Datsyuk-Zetterberg, Staal-BrindAmour,
You pretty much have to go back to our Hawks to find a cup winner without at least 2 great centers down the middle and that is the exception if anything, also considering Kane basically was the center for his own line.
Pretty disrespectful to Letang honestly.Pittsburgh is the only team in how long to win without a strong #1 Dman. Maybe that's the biggest key? You need someone you can also trust on the ice late and in every single situation.
Center depth surely is strongly needed. But lack of depth at center has not been as universal as top dmen
It’s been a while but I don’t think Letang played in 2017Pretty disrespectful to Letang honestly.
Ah my fault Clyde I thought you were just talking about in general. Yes Letang didn't play in 2017 at all in the playoffs.It’s been a while but I don’t think Letang played in 2017
This....prime Letang was one of the top 10-15 D in the league and one of the better offensive one's for sure.Pretty disrespectful to Letang honestly.
He was talking about the penguins winning the cup when letang was out. Dumoulin and Haisney were the top 2 dmenThis....prime Letang was one of the top 10-15 D in the league and one of the better offensive one's for sure.
I'm not so sure of this, I guess it depends how far back you go. But there has been an influx of talent over the last couple months with USHL,BCHL etc players coming in to the league making it much better than the past 5 or so years.OHL is weaker than the past
I was thinking like pre-COVID. 2010-2019 CHL era.I'm not so sure of this, I guess it depends how far back you go. But there has been an influx of talent over the last couple months with USHL,BCHL etc players coming in to the league making it much better than the past 5 or so years.
Should mention that Tampa won a cup with stamkos out all but one game in the playoffs by same token.He was talking about the penguins winning the cup when letang was out. Dumoulin and Haisney were the top 2 dmen
I'm with you here. But I think you need a core of at least 2 hall of fame level players and then 7 players total that could realistically make an all star team. Past that, you need a handful of guys who happily accept their roles. I don't think position matters all that much if you have that mix.I don’t think there’s a magic position combo to winning a cup. Just need a great all around team which tends to mean being strong in many areas.
Yeah, I dont know, it's not the early to mid 2000s OHL, but I think the CHL is better today than it has been in over a decade at least.I was thinking like pre-COVID. 2010-2019 CHL era.
Maybe in next couple years but they bled out a lot of aged talent to ushl/ncaa over a good stretch of years. There was a time not long ago a lot of the top NTDP kids went to the ohl (most common regionally) after that stint but now they all go ncaa. And a good amount of Canadian kids going ncaa these days too.Yeah, I dont know, it's not the early to mid 2000s OHL, but I think the CHL is better today than it has been in over a decade at least.
My guess is it will depend on the team they are on if they go to NCAA when they turn 18. If they are on a team like the Knights, Rangers, Spitfires (teams at the top of the league) I think they stick around, but if they are on a bottom feeder team you will see them leave for school. But some really good kids have come over since they announced the new rule. Blake Montgomery and Jack Pridham are examples I can think of.Maybe in next couple years but they bled out a lot of aged talent to ushl/ncaa over a good stretch of years. There was a time not long ago a lot of the top NTDP kids went to the ohl (most common regionally) after that stint but now they all go ncaa. And a good amount of Canadian kids going ncaa these days too.
With the rule change there could probably be a good migration back during junior years but we’ll see how many then move onto college once they turn 18. This season it’s been mostly non notable BCHL kids going to the QMJHL because it’s easier to make. Ushl hasn’t seen a ton of big in name transfers because they’re asking for big transfer money.
Right now the ohl might be the most “draft year” dominant it’s ever been.