2025 NHL Draft Thread

Kevin Musto

Hard for Bedard
Feb 16, 2018
22,695
29,381
I don't have an EP Rinkside account right now, but here's the portion of the article that isn't behind paywall:



So it sounds like their top 5 is the following:
1. Hagens
2. Schaefer
3. Misa
4. Martone
5. McQueen

With the top 2 being basically a coin flip right now, and anyone in their top 5 being arguably worthy of the top pick. Surprised it's McQueen in the top 5 instead of Frondell; both have been hit hard with injuries this season, but think most publications have had Frondell ranked higher than RM.
Maybe it's just the games I've seen, but Frondell looks more like a mid 1st guy. Definitely not in top 5 contention.
 

TLEH

Pronounced T-Lay
Feb 28, 2015
21,884
19,109
Bomoseen, Vermont
Understandable. If Ravensbergen falls to the 2nd, then I think he definitely should be in consideration. I’m hoping they consider taking a chance on one of these Russian goalies like Pyotr Andreyanov and Semyon Frolov
Take three goalies past the fifth round. Idc. Used the 35th pick on a guy who might be 4th or 5th best currently in his own class. Next year he could be the best again or have to transfer to get playing time.

Aka.. goalies are random as hell.
 

Crow

Registered User
May 19, 2014
4,694
3,569
Makes me wonder what picks we have this year. I can’t remember. Two firsts ours and Toronto. What about the 2nd round? Could see another goalie there if we have two.
 

Joemoe

Registered User
Aug 3, 2015
437
510
Makes me wonder what picks we have this year. I can’t remember. Two firsts ours and Toronto. What about the 2nd round? Could see another goalie there if we have two.
Hawks have two 2nds this year, 3 the next, and 2 after that. Probably add another one or two after the deadline as these are given out like candy on Halloween.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Crow

Mjul Qvist

Registered User
Nov 28, 2009
139
105
Maybe it's just the games I've seen, but Frondell looks more like a mid 1st guy. Definitely not in top 5 contention.

Only thing that concerns me about Frondell are the injuries he has had. But he still has great potential as skilled two-way center. I would take him before McQueen.
 

Kevin Musto

Hard for Bedard
Feb 16, 2018
22,695
29,381
Kirby Dach like upside? Just kidding..maybe but Frondell is really smart player with high hockey IQ and could become reliable two-way center who can score too.
I mean, Kirby did have a lot of upside. Just injury prone.

Same could be true of McQueen.

I'm just saying that the collection of 6'5", good skating, and silky hands is more unique than Frondell's package which is a bit more "dime a dozen" so to speak.

At their apex, McQueen is a rarer breed.
 

Mjul Qvist

Registered User
Nov 28, 2009
139
105
I mean, Kirby did have a lot of upside. Just injury prone.

Same could be true of McQueen.

I'm just saying that the collection of 6'5", good skating, and silky hands is more unique than Frondell's package which is a bit more "dime a dozen" so to speak.

At their apex, McQueen is a rarer breed.

That is true. McQueen´s ceiling is probably higher but Frondell´s floor might be better.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kevin Musto

HawksDub89

Registered User
Apr 17, 2019
1,776
1,954
Only thing that concerns me about Frondell are the injuries he has had. But he still has great potential as skilled two-way center. I would take him before McQueen.

I will have a Kevin Musto like draft day meltdown if we take Frondell top 5.

I wouldn’t even take him top 10 right now.

I have some questions about how high Frondell's offensive ceiling is.

Bingo
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Kevin Musto

Mjul Qvist

Registered User
Nov 28, 2009
139
105
I have some questions about how high Frondell's offensive ceiling is.

Frondell was third in latest McKenzie´s list (september 19th):

"Swedish centre Frondell is another prospect scouts find easy to like.

At 6-feet and 196 pounds, he already has strength and physical maturity. He has a strong attention to detail slant to his game and a high hockey IQ – both with and without the puck.

He probably projects more as a No. 2 NHL centre rather than a No. 1 because his offensive productivity is not necessarily elite, but his all-around game is excellent. Which is to say he can generate offence both by scoring and making plays, but he also is dedicated to a smart defensive game that includes a healthy amount of physical play.

“He’s just a really good two-way centre with all the tools,” one scout said.

Frondell received votes from No. 2 to No. 6 and six of the 10 scouts had him at either No. 2 or No. 3."
 
  • Like
Reactions: Castle8130

Castle8130

Registered User
May 9, 2017
3,039
2,550
Frondell is more of a two-way guy instead of an offensive generator. He can do both though. After the top 4, I wouldn't mind Frondell at 5, but there really aren't a whole lot of options.

My nightmare scenario is the Hawks go on a heater in the final 5 games of the season and draft like 7th oa and reach for Lynden Lakovic. He is the exact type of player Davidson likes to draft and it scares me to pieces. Like a taller Oliver Moore.

Frondell/Desnoyer/Bear/Mcqueen are all fine picks. We'll see as we get closer. Mcqueen's back injury is a bit scary
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mjul Qvist

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad