Kevin Musto
Hard for Bedard
- Feb 16, 2018
- 22,616
- 29,284
Weak birth year. Doesn’t help that the top late birthday US players aren’t available (Hagens, Hensler) while the CHL ones are (Martone, Spence)An unfortunate showing for the Americans
Very one sided game
I think the draft is similar enough 1-4, that if there were a significant sweetener attached to the #3 or 4 pick to move down a spot or 2, I would do it. If someone loves Schaefer at #2 and offered 3 or 4 with a future 1st or an equivalent prospect, I would do that. Until/Unless the draft board changes, I have Hagens, Misa, Martone, and Schaefer relatively equal or in the ball park of each other enough that a 2nd premium asset to pass on one to be left with another would be a win.
I wanted Lev last year and would have no issue doubling down on D. Kid is a stud.
if there was a sure fire toews/malkin in this draft would this be a discussion? seems we'll likely end uo in a position of convincing ourselves there is one to justify passing on a dman because of the log jamThis is a dilemma for me.
On one hand you gotta get bedard his Malkin/Toews but on the other you gotta make sure you have a 1D.
Schaefer Levshunov
Vlasic rinzel
Korchinski Allan/Kaiser/EDM
You win cups with a D core that deep. But somebody besides Bedard will need to score.
I guess you can’t really go wrong with either direction as long as you get one of those four prospects.
Second this. Trade Korchinski as part of a package for a forward and be in on either Marner or Rantanen if one of them hits the market.Hopefully Korchinski plays well to build his value, draft Scheaffer and trade Korchinski at the draft for a young forward.
Also pay through the nose for another forward in UFA. But this time one that is actually good.
if there was a sure fire toews/malkin in this draft would this be a discussion? seems we'll likely end uo in a position of convincing ourselves there is one to justify passing on a dman because of the log jam