2025 NHL Draft Thread

belfour30

Blackhawks Fangirl
Dec 14, 2019
2,040
1,771
If you watch some of schafers highlights this year. he is 6-2 and his birthday is sept IE 23 months younger then AL (assuming that is his real age) the youngest players in the draft. he looks like a # 1 to me. I wanted demidov last year but I think I want schafer this year. IMO we dont have a # 1 Lots of 2-3 guys. KK, AL, AV, Rinzel, then bottom pairing guys allen, kaiser,phillips del mastro.

assuming at some point Jones moves on.
Schafer AL
Vlasic rinzel
KK allen
kaiser, philips Extra. move Del mastro for a Center

of the top 4-5 forwards. Martone (skating) hagens (size) frondell mcqueen (injuries) I guess Misa does not have any real flaw . It hink Schafer goes #1
Move KK for a similar F, draft Schaefer would probably be ok with me if Misa and Martone are off when the Hawks pick.
 

u2wojo

Registered User
Dec 22, 2011
960
747
Despite how bad the Hawks have been and they currently have the lowest points total in the league, it's not by much. I know it's early but 1 or 2 more wins and they're like 10th worst. And all it might take is Bedard to figure it out for them to trend up as their goal differential isn't all that bad.

My point is that it's very possible that they end up picking between 8 and 12 despite their current record. They're in a weird spot where selling vets might actually make them better because they have the talented kids below to replace them.
Yes it is a real fine margin between terrible and just regular old bad and for sure plugging in some of Nazar, Dach, Savoie, Slaggert, EDM, KK, Lev after the TDL in theory may give you an improvement in talent, but there will still be growing pains with those youngster (even if maybe more talented). Let's see how things playout into the new year with Jones/Brossoit out. Soda is playing great, but is there a regression in his game at some point? After seeing what he was last year, I still have my doubts that he went straight from terrible to really good and his reality is probably something in between those 2 extremes. Still have a lot of guys on the roster with significant injury history in Hall, Murphy, Mrazek where a couple injuries could put us more squarely in the terrible category.

Regardless, I think it is real important to end up in the top 4 in this draft as there is a pretty rapid drop off in prospects after Hagens, Misa, Martone, & Shafer.
 
  • Like
Reactions: belfour30

belfour30

Blackhawks Fangirl
Dec 14, 2019
2,040
1,771
Regardless, I think it is real important to end up in the top 4 in this draft as there is a pretty rapid drop off in prospects after Hagens, Misa, Martone, & Shafer.

If Hagens or Schaefer are the BPA and only guy left out of that group when the Hawks pick, then you gotta take them even if they really don't fit.
 

TheFridge

Registered User
Mar 20, 2022
1,722
1,857
There’s also a real lack of depth after the top 5 that continues as well. So you’re not getting a guaranteed superstar and late firsts are worth a lot less.

Like there’s a huge gap between Celebrini and Hagens. Celebrini tore up college and didn’t have high end wingers flanking him. Hagens hasn’t come close to that playing with some of the best talent college has to offer in Leonard and Perreault.

Martone has skating concerns. McQueen has injury issues. There’s a major drop off in talent after the top 5. So yes, it is in fact a weak draft. 2024 wasn’t super strong, but there was definitely better depth across the board.

A lack of depth? I'm looking at the rankings and the production of some of these players and it looks to be about as good as any draft, including last year.

Celebrini is a better prospect than Hagens generally, but he's also way more physically advanced which helped his transition to college.

If you were doing a ranking of each of the players over the last two years, the 2025 draft would have 3 of the top-4 forwards available, it would have the best D available and probably the best goaltender available too. But it doesn't have a consensus #1 right now. So it's "weak".
 

u2wojo

Registered User
Dec 22, 2011
960
747
Last years draft went 10-12 guys deep where the concensus was they project to top of the lineup prospects. This year you are looking at half that at this point. A couple more forward prospects then last year and maybe just one D total as opposed to a half dozen last class. It is early (haven't even had the WJC data point) and guys will rise and fall and likely a few more of those top of the lineup projected prospects will emerge, but for now the last class was deeper while this classes top 4 or 5 are better (outside of Celebrini being the best option across either class).
 

belfour30

Blackhawks Fangirl
Dec 14, 2019
2,040
1,771
Also if you're not going to pick Schaefer and the 3 forwards are off the board, just trade down.
 

u2wojo

Registered User
Dec 22, 2011
960
747
Also if you're not going to pick Schaefer and the 3 forwards are off the board, just trade down.
Or fire Davidson on the spot. Schaefer would be BPA and in the top 5 of the draft for a rebuilding team with massive holes everywhere (including LHD) we better be taking the best players with a chance to be elite. Taking Schaefer and having him Korch and Vlassic all end up top 3 D would be the most awesome problem ever and a way better position than ending up with a middle 6 forward.

Trading down for a team with a deep prospect pool, but signiifcant question on what exactly they have as elite top of the lineup guys is the exact oposite of what should be happening. Good news is Davidson's track record (of actual trades and rumors of attempted) shows he understands that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Giovi

belfour30

Blackhawks Fangirl
Dec 14, 2019
2,040
1,771
Or fire Davidson on the spot. Schaefer would be BPA and in the top 5 of the draft for a rebuilding team with massive holes everywhere (including LHD) we better be taking the best players with a chance to be elite. Taking Schaefer and having him Korch and Vlassic all end up top 3 D would be the most awesome problem ever and a way better position than ending up with a middle 6 forward.

Trading down for a team with a deep prospect pool, but signiifcant question on what exactly they have as elite top of the lineup guys is the exact oposite of what should be happening. Good news is Davidson's track record (of actual trades and rumors of attempted) shows he understands that.
yeah I'm with you.
I'm at the point where if Hagens or Schaefer are the BPA you just take them and then use Nazar/Korchinski as trade chips.

They don't have to get forwards with size in the draft.

I really wish they could get Brady Tkachuk but....probably not going to happen.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad