Dead Meat
Registered User
- Apr 27, 2004
- 756
- 1,020
Is anyone concerned with Martone's feet?
Is anyone concerned with Martone's feet?
I get your point. I think the overarching thing is that guys who DON'T score in junior don't magically just score in the pros. The guys that do score in junior aren't guaranteed to do that in the pros, but they have a way better shot.Guys, some of these drafts were ~<2 years ago. How has Andrew Cristall's stock skyrocketed? Or Perreault's? Or Musty's? These are players who we knew could score as juniors in their draft years who are still playing junior (or college). No one is going to care that Cristall put up 130 points in his final WHL season if he can't score in the NHL. He might as well be Ty Rattie right now.
People can proclaim the Hawks made the wrong pick(s) when these players get to the NHL and start producing -- if they ever do.
Perreault is an especially annoying name to come out because people somehow believe their view of him is vindicated because he's scored in college. No one ever doubted he would be a good college player -- especially while being glued to elite college talents like Smith, Hagens, Gauthier and Leonard.
We'll get a much better sense of what Perreault can be when he's not playing with those guys in pro hockey.
Haven´t read anything about them that makes me concerned. Blackhawks could use some Matthew Tkachuk type of player in future?
I get your point. I think the overarching thing is that guys who DON'T score in junior don't magically just score in the pros. The guys that do score in junior aren't guaranteed to do that in the pros, but they have a way better shot.
Exactly. I’m kind of over the whole “needs to be an unbelievable skater to be a hawk” narrative.
There’s a massive difference between “can’t skate” and average skater.
Boisvert is proof they’ll draft an average skater if they like the other traits.
Thats my entire point. Guys that play up your lineup in the pros score at a high rate, and almost all of those guys scored at a high rate in junior. If your argument is that if Perreault doesn't score then he's in Switzerland then I'll probably agree with you but I think the risk isn't that dissimilar to a guy with a higher floor just becoming a 4th line checker. I'd rather take the bet on the scoring translating. Its not like Cristall even went that high, I'd rather have him scoring at the rate he is in the WHL than whatever a lot of the other guys in the 2nd are doing.To me it's not a matter of a guy scoring or not scoring. Obviously players that don't score in Junior likely aren't going to score in the NHL. But it's how they score that will translate. Cristall for instance is simply more talented than 99% of WHL players. But is he going to score when the talent distribution equalizes, his perimeter play is more isolating and suddenly his athletic traits (or lack thereof) hold him back? Same thing applies to Perreault.
Perreault has 18 points in 11 games.Perreault (along with Leonard) are off to much slower starts now that the team they’re on isn’t nearly as stacked as last year.
So let’s hold off on declaring victories and losses. And I’m no fan of the Moore pick.
Yeah Perreault still looks great.Perreault has 18 points in 11 games.
Perreault has more points through the 11 games BC has played this year than he did through 11 games BC played last year, he's doing that against a tougher schedule this year than last, and BC has as many first round picks now as they did last year and more second round picks. So, not sure what you're talking about.Perreault (along with Leonard) are off to much slower starts now that the team they’re on isn’t nearly as stacked as last year.
So let’s hold off on declaring victories and losses. And I’m no fan of the Moore pick.
I made this point before. Points isn't everything. McGroarty significantly outproduced Nazar last season on the same team and Nazar right now is tearing up the AHL with 16 points in 13 games and McGroarty has been quiet with 3 points in 12 games. The one tool that Nazar has on McGroarty is skating and that clearly makes a difference at higher levels.Yeah Perreault still looks great.
I agree. Its not everything. I watched that Michigan team a lot and was constantly reporting that Nazar was not receiving favorable deployment.I made this point before. Points isn't everything. McGroarty significantly outproduced Nazar last season on the same team and Nazar right now is tearing up the AHL with 16 points in 13 games and McGroarty has been quiet with 3 points in 12 games. The one tool that Nazar has on McGroarty is skating and that clearly makes a difference at higher levels.
Will Perreault end up being a better NHL player than Moore? Maybe. But the knock on Perreault at the time was skating and Moore was the best skater in the draft. So let's wait a year or 2 before declaring anything.
It's how people treat Nick Lardis... a guy scoring scoring and scoring when you know he can score at those levels is kinda boring.No one is saying its done and dusted, but waiting until it is to form an opinion is kinda boring.
I agree. Its not everything. I watched that Michigan team a lot and was constantly reporting that Nazar was not receiving favorable deployment.
Perreault's scoring was just that much better than anyone available at that range and I think the skating thing is a bit overblown for him anyway. Of course comparing him to Moore's skating, anyone will look bad.
No one is saying its done and dusted, but waiting until it is to form an opinion is kinda boring.
The 2025 NHL Draft currently appears to be a weaker class than usual, and this assessment aligns with feedback we’re receiving from NHL team scouts so far. Specifically within Europe, in the USHL and the NTDP. The QMJHL, WHL & NCAA have decent talent pools comparing to their usual draft classes, while the OHL has a good class of eligible players. However, there is a noticeable shortage of high-end talents in this draft class and it starts early in our list.