Kobe Armstrong
Registered User
- Jul 26, 2011
- 15,389
- 8,499
The thought of Nesbitt and Hensler is grossing me out, Nesbitt is another Quartexx guy too
Yeah there is a clear top-13/14 and then we will get the first 2 cracks at the leftovers.Foot soldiers, huh?
From 2 of the scouts polled by Bobby Margherita:
If the air of unpredictability on how the top 10 will unfold is noticeable, it’s nothing compared to how chaotic the draft may look beyond the top 10 or dozen prospects.
“The quality of the player you get between 11 and 20 may not be that different than the player you get between 20 and 30 or even 30 to 40,” said a scout. “I really like the top 10 to maybe 15, but after that it’s a whole lot of average.”
Added another: “When you have no idea who gets selected from about 20 to 60, or in what order, and even the 10 to 30 order looks like it’s all over the place, well, that says to me it’s a below-average group. Lots of support players and foot soldiers, who are important to have, but very few difference-makers and generals who move the needle in a big way.”
I would not like that pick, especially with how many bigger bland Cs there are in this draft I don't think we need to use 16/17 on any.The thought of Nesbitt and Hensler is grossing me out, Nesbitt is another Quartexx guy too
I wouldn’t be a fan either but it seems like NHL scouts see something in his game. I just see a 3C.I would not like that pick, especially with how many bigger bland Cs there are in this draft I don't think we need to use 16/17 on any.
Seven picks in the first three rounds felt like an embarrassment of riches a year ago.The top-13 looks like a lock at this point, I don't see anyone with potential to jump past Aitcheson except Bear.
Our picks are looking like whoever is left between Bear, Hensler, Lakovic, Cootes
Sad.
I'd be going Bear and Kindel thereView attachment 1054104
From Bob's list, I'd be ok with any 2 of Bear, Hensler, Carbonneau and Lakovic. And then Cootes, Reschny and Nesbitt would be the bottom 3.
TBH as long as we get Bear, I'd be very very happy with anyone else at 17.
I wonder if Jackson Smith could fall to 16 like Guhle did, a faller like him or Eklund, even if it isn't an ideal position for us, would make the draft much sweeter. Then we can take whatever project/reach we want with the other 1st and not have too much stake on it.Seven picks in the first three rounds felt like an embarrassment of riches a year ago.
Things shifted. Martin…out of reach.
At the start of this thread, Habs were picking 13 and 16. I thought: That sucks.
Now the 13 looks good.
Ottawa has Sanderson, Chabot and Kleven at LD so I doubt that they will be looking for a LHD. You are definitely correct in saying that it just takes one team to make this decision.I think a team like Ottawa will end up trading up to take Aitcheson actually, some team will overvalue him as "the meanest player in the draft" and see him as a must have if he makes it to 12/13
There’s usually a surprise or two in Rd 1, and this year seems ripe for at least a couple.I wonder if Jackson Smith could fall to 16 like Guhle did, a faller like him or Eklund, even if it isn't an ideal position for us, would make the draft much sweeter. Then we can take whatever project/reach we want with the other 1st and not have too much stake on it.
Smith feels like a Harley pick when he fell to 18. Honestly coming out of any of the top 13 picks + Bear would be an insane haul for us.I wonder if Jackson Smith could fall to 16 like Guhle did, a faller like him or Eklund, even if it isn't an ideal position for us, would make the draft much sweeter. Then we can take whatever project/reach we want with the other 1st and not have too much stake on it.
Interesting to see Nesbitt so high on Bob's list. I'll admit I've only seen a few clips of Nesbitt's play, and it's been hard to be excited about a player who seems to have foot speed issues. Are the foot speed issues being overstated?
It would be pretty cool to add a 6'4" center prospect into our pipeline, but I'm not a fan of picking guys with below average skating ability so high in the draft.
He just became my favorite prospect.The thought of Nesbitt and Hensler is grossing me out, Nesbitt is another Quartexx guy too
In this draft, theres a pretty big drop off after top 3-12. Our target(s) should be RHD first, C second. Ryabkin is a pretty good boom or bust prospect. I have him as a potential 2C with 1C upside or a complete bust.. we dont need a "Beck"/Evans 2.0. Take the chance if the RHD is not available.Ryabkin is not worth the gamble at 16/17. Not a chance in hell we draft him that early. Hugo will be tarred and feathered if that happens.
cootes is smallI have a top 12.. and I don't anticipate any of the top 12 falling to us except Bear because of the injury and being introverted.
Aitcheson probably 3rd/4th D man off the board.
Freidman just mentioned Cootes getting late hype and plays C.
I thought Prokhorov was still on another planet (like 3rd Round). The fact he’s now on the cusp of the 1st Round is not good. It means some teams might like him at 20…Use 17th + prospect to move up, grab McQueen or whoever you think will help the Top 6 the most.
Use 16th to pick best F prospect left that is over 6 feet.
Use 41st and 49th to move up to 22-32 range, draft Prokhorov.
You get 3 F prospects in one draft, all of them adding size. At least one will hit, 2 if we're lucky, 3 if we hit the jackpot.