It's the biggest crapshoot draft in years.
I genuinely don't care about any of these prospects. We are drafting depth players if we stick to 16 and 17. Still important to hit...but meh.
I disagree, there are a LOT of high-upside players in the top-50. The top-10 is not as defined as other years, but the depth is interesting.
A guy like Zharovsky, whom I have at #39, could be a PPG+ winger in the NHL with great development.
Reschny, Kindel, Potter, all have first-line upside if they adapt/develop their game well.
Reid I see as having Josh Morrissey-lite upside if he hits.
Lakovic could be a first-liner too.
Plus, there are also lots of guys with some "elite" aspects to their games that could surprise with further development (West, Nestrasil, Gastrin, etc.).
I know that you're not high on this draft, but there are still some guys that will be useful and important parts of the team that could be available at #16-17.
They should be interested in him. Like the article said, he's so young for the class, he's got a ton of athletic growth left and there's offensive upside to his game.
Fiddler's problem is that his skills are still VERY RAW offensively, inconsistent as hell, and his hockey sense offensively isn't well-developed.
Fiddler has the skating, size, and strength to really make something of himself in the NHL considering his defensive game is already mature.
But it would take a lot more development offensively for Fiddler to "make it" as an offensive top-4D or first-pairing D in comparison to any of the guys I've rated higher in my list for this draft (Schaefer, Smith, Aitcheson, Hensler, and Reid).
I could see a world in which Fiddler ends up a great defenseman overall, but I could also see a world in which his skills/reads/hands remain unpolished even as a pro and Fiddler ends up a third-pairing defenseman or maybe even a journeyman.