HF Habs: - 2025 NHL Draft: Part II | Page 101 | HFBoards - NHL Message Board and Forum for National Hockey League

HF Habs: 2025 NHL Draft: Part II

Spending our assets while NOT addressing our positional needs is a perfect template for a failed rebuild.
Getting Laff in such a trade protects us from the unkown of Laine next year, also allows us to deal (if needed) PL at the TDL for another need. He'll also fit into our age window and team Captain Cap.

Not sure about you guys but I dont want to start next season banking on guys like PL or Dach to step up.
 
I shouldn't have to do this but every year it's the same, if you have to pay to read something, don't post it as that is copyright and HF could be sued. Either way I was contacted by one of the scouting sites that saw their content being pasted on this board.

My bad - I thought we got paste or get some snippets, just not the full article or whatever.
 
I preparing myself already with the fact that we will automatically pick 1 D with one of our 2 picks...either Hensler, Fiddler or even Bruz.
Ds are so hard to judge because of the longer timeline. You can sometimes find gems in the late first round and early second.
 
At 16-17, I'm still aiming at top 6 forward, top 4 D,s....there's no world for me that makes me believe Zonnon is anything but a bottom 6 at best. Cannon of a shot. But feet and overall skillset does not scream top 6.
 
That’s what Beck is…

and Kapanen? But I actually like Cootes and I think the team drafting him will think he can bring more offense and be a 2C. I don't think it's unrealistic. The nice thing with him is that his floor is very high... he should at least be a good 3C who plays some special teams.
Maybe my standards are too high, but I don't think Beck, Kapanen or Evans are a 3C on a contender.

I would certainly never want one filling in for an injured 2C like Eller did for example for Backstrom in 2018.
 
Those bad feet seem to be holding him back in the playoffs, though.

Plus Jason Robertson is the optimal outcome, but an unlikely one.

I like Zonnon but he's not a 16/17th overall pick.
You get tons of players who have problems and don’t fix them. You have a few players who fix major problems and do better than expected.

It’s not a matter of disregarding the problems, it’s finding guys who may fix their problems. If you can hit one out of five after round 1 that would be good. The habs pretty much batted zero hoping big guys would learn to skate for a couple of decades.
 
I get a feeling Spence might keep slipping...

But yeah I wouldn't want to give up too much to get Bear... I think there will be a comparable guy available. Bear is a very fun prospect and extremely likeable... but I do have some doubts with him (even though I love his game!!)

I would want a more sure thing if we have to give up much value
If Bear is there at 16 I would take him. But wouldn't move say...Jackets 2nd to move up to 14 to get him.
 
The chances to hit 2 home runs with the 16 AND 17h are quite low.

So if we keep both I would either pick:

2 forwards

Or

2 defencemen.

So one of those 2 could become either a top 6 forward or a top 4 defenseman


Example if Mtl on their list has

15th : A Defeseman

16th: Forward

17th : Forward

I would go with the 2 forwards even if the D is still available
 
I know all this Crosby talk is straight out of space, but I'd love to see him in a Montreal jersey for a year or two, if it doesn't cost the moon. His leadership and experience would be greatly valuable for our youth.

Crosby-Demidov combo would be fun to watch.
 
Big skilled forwards who don't have a mean bone in their body, refuse to get to the middle of the ice, and check out when it gets physical?
We have a different vision of the player, I saw him get into the middle and use his frame to win pucks quite a few times. He is more Max Pacioretty than Benoit Pouliot, kid is a powerful skater with great hands, easily one of the top transitional players in that draft. Can pass, can shoot, there is alot of upside there. He is my prime traget for a trade up in the 8-12 range, he and Eklund, but I think Ekklund goes higher than the concensus currently have him going.
 
We have a different vision of the player, I saw him get into the middle and use his frame to win pucks quite a few times. He is more Max Pacioretty than Benoit Pouliot, kid is a powerful skater with great hands, easily one of the top transitional players in that draft. Can pass, can shoot, there is alot of upside there. He is my prime traget for a trade up in the 8-12 range, he and Eklund, but I think Ekklund goes higher than the concensus currently have him going.

It's the consensus view on him. Yeah, he's done it at times but his default mechanism is just perimeter flashy offensive stuff.. Benoit Pouliot, Anthony Mantha types. Personally, I don't see Tigers change their stripes and I've been fooled too many times hoping a big guy will learn to play between the dots. If you draft him, you have to be OK with a Mantha type player. I personally can't stand those guys.

“Lakovic is an intriguing prospect. He’s a big body forward who can be elusive on open ice with his effortless stride. He’s difficult to check when he’s handling the puck due to his long reach and stature. He has excellent puck touch for a big man and contributed 27 goals and 31 assists in 47 games for Moose Jaw this year. With the Warriors not qualifying for the playoffs, his season has come to an end. Lakovic is a late birthday (Dec. 12, 2006). He has aged out of being eligible for the U18 World Championship, and his style of play will be debated in scouting meetings leading up to the draft. For his stature, he isn’t physically overpowering, he’s more of a finesse forward.”Jason Bukala, Sportsnet

“When we first highlighted Lynden Lakovic in early October, emphasis was on his growth as a playmaker. He had the flashes the previous season, but he was starting to control games with his willingness to draw pressure before dishing, deception, and a diverse passing skill set. And that was coupled with dynamic rushes and an NHL shot. Nearing the halfway point of the season, it’s safe to say that Lakovic’s growth as a playmaker is for real. But we did have some questions about his physical game. Yes, he’s tall and electrifying with the puck, but he always ended up on the outside of battles and didn’t use his body much. He challenged that perception at the CHL-USA Prospects Challenge…Not sure anyone did more for their stock in that game than Lakovic. This was a different version than the Moose Jaw version, showcasing a lot more willingness to use his body, engage opponents along the wall, and control contact on retrievals. Given that, it should be no surprise that he, along with Ben Kindel, were the CHL’s best chance creators at 5-on-5 in this game.” – Mitch Brown, Elite Prospects

January 2025 – Lakovic is an intriguing player due to his combination of skating, size, playmaking, and raw skill. Lakovic cannot really be considered a power forward at this time. His game doesn’t centre around driving inside or using his body and physicality to gain the net front. Instead, Lakovic creates most of his value through playmaking, puck carrying, and rush offence.

At the CHL/USA Prospect Challenge, Lakovic showed more of the things that NHL teams look for, displaying energy on the forecheck, dropping the shoulder on the rush, and finding quality looks for his teammates. The question with Lakovic is whether he’ll be able to develop a more physical, consistent game, and—with the trade deadline departure of Brayden Yager —whether he’ll have the support to do so. Luke Sweeney
Lakovic was the best player on a poor Moose Jaw team, but his body of work plus his athleticism is impressive. He's a 6-foot-4 winger who skates quite well for his size. He has a powerful and fluid stride and can easily avoid checkers. He's a creative offensive player with the hands to make defenders miss often. Lakovic sees the ice well enough but scouts aren't fully convinced on that aspect of his game. He's more of a scorer than a passer with a legit mid-range shot. His compete level is mediocre. It won't hold him back at the top level, but I wouldn't call him a hard-to-play-against type who makes full use of his big frame and he plays too much on the outside. He projects as a top-six winger. - Pronman
 
  • Like
Reactions: le_sean

Users who are viewing this thread

Ad

Ad