GDT: - 2025 NHL Draft Lottery 5/5/25 at 4:00pm PT (UPD: Sharks will pick 2nd. Isles get 1st) | Page 16 | HFBoards - NHL Message Board and Forum for National Hockey League

GDT: 2025 NHL Draft Lottery 5/5/25 at 4:00pm PT (UPD: Sharks will pick 2nd. Isles get 1st)

Status
Not open for further replies.
You're essentially arguing that buying lottery tickets is a good financial plan because hey, someone's gotta win.

Counting on longshot odds to come through and buttress the future of a team that's otherwise kinda in the middle is not a strategy. It's dumb luck. Yes, having just a 25% chance to win the lottery from #1 is luck too, but at least it's doing it from the best possible odds of success and from the point of being a team that is not in position to compete as they are constructed at the time.
I’m not sure what else you expected the islanders to do. I doubt the plan to win the draft lotto was in the back of the heads.
 
FWIW, Martone was compared to Perry and Matty T by others.
Oh I know… it’s why I mentioned them. But again you have to believe Martone is that.

I have heard Tavares for Misa. Again these are just comps. You have to believe that they will become “like” these players.
 
We had a 25% chance to pick #1 overall and a less than 45% chance to pick 1 or 2 overall. Two years in a row.
We ended up with one #1 and one #2. I'm not going to try to math that out, but I'm pretty sure the odds will say that we have been fortunate rather than unfortunate the last 2 years.

In three consecutive drafts, the Sharks got a #4 pick in a draft with a significant drop off after #5, a #1 pick in a draft where there was a significant gap between #1 and #2, and a #2 in a draft with a significant gap between #2 and #3. I don't know how much fortunate they could have gotten!
 
In three consecutive drafts, the Sharks got a #4 pick in a draft with a significant drop off after #5, a #1 pick in a draft where there was a significant gap between #1 and #2, and a #2 in a draft with a significant gap between #2 and #3. I don't know how much fortunate they could have gotten!

Not to mention the #1 pick was in a year with a franchise-changing superstar. Unlike, say, this year.
 
In three consecutive drafts, the Sharks got a #4 pick in a draft with a significant drop off after #5, a #1 pick in a draft where there was a significant gap between #1 and #2, and a #2 in a draft with a significant gap between #2 and #3. I don't know how much fortunate they could have gotten!
There is also interesting analytics out there that basically says unless if you “know”/think you are getting Quinn Hughes or Makar… it’s better to just leave defense to the late first or second round and draft centers/forwards at the top of drafts.

More so because they are easier to project.
 
Islanders have goal scoring problems worse than the sharks you’d think they’d go after Misa. Their D is serviceable and doesn’t lose them the games as much as their inability to score goals does. But who knows sharks win regardless
They also have Calum Ritchie now and elite level sniper in Eiserman. Schaefer makes the most sense.
 
The draft just got exciting. We either have our forward core set for over a decade or get a key piece to our defence.

I really don't mind the Isles winning. Good for them, I suppose. So much for my dream of them picking third. :laugh: Kind of makes me wonder what they do with Dobson if they pick Schaefer. Probably just sign him. :dunno:
 
If the Sharks draft Misa, they could very well throw out these 3 lines this upcoming season: (yes I know Misa is considering going to NCAA, but IMHO he's good enough for the NHL now)

Eklund-Celebrini-Toffoli
Cherny-Misa-Graf
Musty-Smith-Halttunen/Cardwell/UFA

And this right there would make Sharks hockey in 25-26 very fun to watch as a fan.
I would have no problems starting next season with this sort of top nine:

Eklund-Celebrini-Toffoli
Wennberg-Smith-Graf
Chernyshov-Misa-a vet like Reilly Smith
 
There is also interesting analytics out there that basically says unless if you “know”/think you are getting Quinn Hughes or Makar… it’s better to just leave defense to the late first or second round and draft centers/forwards at the top of drafts.

More so because they are easier to project.

If you stick by the old adage that defensemen take longer to develop, then spending later picks on defensive projects isn't a bad decision.

I actually don't think the Sharks defense prospects are that poor. There's no definite #1 or #2 guy but between Dickinson, LSW & Pohlkamp (both of which seem to have a decent chance to be NHLers per some of the stat modeling floating around), Muhk, and Cagnoni, the depth may be there.

Grab a #1 in the next couple of years (we're still gonna be in the lottery) when you have to draft for need and gather more chances to get a hit on a Vlasic or Faber in the top 50 this year.
 
In three consecutive drafts, the Sharks got a #4 pick in a draft with a significant drop off after #5, a #1 pick in a draft where there was a significant gap between #1 and #2, and a #2 in a draft with a significant gap between #2 and #3. I don't know how much fortunate they could have gotten!
The Sharks have been dodging the line of demarcation like f***ing Neo

Today is a good day, not Celebrini-good, but very good
 
Need to watch Eiserman more
He's your garden variety early bloomer, great finisher. Probably has several years as a legit second liner and regular goal-scorer, but I would be absolutely shocked if he were ever a serious top line forward. You can't be that on finishing alone unless you are literally Alex Ovechkin.

I bet my Cal Ritchie take is a bit hotter, since a lot of people don't believe in Eiserman, but I also do not remotely see first line skill there. 60 point soft-minutes 2C in his prime would be a great outcome for him IMO.
 
Mike Grier seeing the world in Matrix code.gif
1746511862172.gif
 
We had a 25% chance to pick #1 overall and a less than 45% chance to pick 1 or 2 overall. Two years in a row.
We ended up with one #1 and one #2. I'm not going to try to math that out, but I'm pretty sure the odds will say that we have been fortunate rather than unfortunate the last 2 years.
Aren’t the odds always 3.25%? Same as a coin flip.
 
Can you imagine how the draft show would have been if this format was last year and they had to redraw the numbers multiple times for the #2 pick. That would have been entertaining especially after already securing the #1 pick.
 
If the Sharks draft Misa, they could very well throw out these 3 lines this upcoming season: (yes I know Misa is considering going to NCAA, but IMHO he's good enough for the NHL now)
Misa needs another year in a tougher league before NHL IMO. CHL competition is not as stiff as it once was. Celebrini dominated NCAA hockey in his draft year. I'd like to see Misa do the same.
 
On the other hand, there is a non-zero chance James Hagens goes first.
The draft lottery results have officially started my super curmudgeon mode, which I will be in starting today until June 27. So here's curmudgeon post #1.

There is no f***ing way that James Hagens is going first. Teams don't draft players because of who they rooted for as youngsters or having grown up near the team.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Some things i'm thinking about w/r/t the Isles' decision:
  • Who (as in the management team) is making their pick now that Lou is gone?
  • What's your window here? is taking Misa a repeat of Tavares and Barzal?
  • Does Dallas shutting down Colorado without a #1D make them think they have enough in Dobson, who is a righty (premium handedness)?
  • Do they think Ritchie is better than Misa? or if not better, will be faster to develop to meet their window?
  • If they take Misa, do you sell Barzal and fully rebuild, with Misa being the lucky first piece?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Ad

Ad