hohosaregood
Banned
- Sep 1, 2011
- 32,371
- 14,833
boston probably goes with a forward too
The injury threw everything off. If Schaefer had stayed healthy and dominated then I don't know if there's much debate at all over who goes #1.I can’t imagine any team choosing 1st overall considers positional need or debates forward or defence. Not selecting Schaeffer would be insane. He’s the best available player and it would be foolish for Chicago or Buffalo or whoever to pass on him.
I don’t think the injury matters unless there’s concern it could be a chronic problem, similar to Cayden Lindstrom last year and Roger McQueen. A broken collarbone doesn’t seem as serious as back issues. When Schaeffer did play he was consistently the best player. Assuming the medical reports check out he should be the pick all day.The injury threw everything off. If Schaefer had stayed healthy and dominated then I don't know if there's much debate at all over who goes #1.
I think teams not being able to watch him, they get infatuated with the guys they can watch. I'm curious to see Bob Mckenzie's final rankings, because he'll talk to executives and get some kind of consensus. I don't expect Schaefer to be anywhere close to unanimously the top pick.I don’t think the injury matters unless there’s concern it could be a chronic problem, similar to Cayden Lindstrom last year and Roger McQueen. A broken collarbone doesn’t seem as serious as back issues. When Schaeffer did play he was consistently the best player. Assuming the medical reports check out he should be the pick all day.
I think Schaefer will be #1 unanymous in large part because Misa stumbled in the POs, Martone has fallen out of #1 contention and hagens seems to as well. Seems to me that Misa was the only real #1 contender but his PO performance hurts that alot.I think teams not being able to watch him, they get infatuated with the guys they can watch. I'm curious to see Bob Mckenzie's final rankings, because he'll talk to executives and get some kind of consensus. I don't expect Schaefer to be anywhere close to unanimously the top pick.
He didn't start as the consensus #1. It matters because almost everyone else played their way out of the #1 spot.I don’t think the injury matters unless there’s concern it could be a chronic problem, similar to Cayden Lindstrom last year and Roger McQueen. A broken collarbone doesn’t seem as serious as back issues. When Schaeffer did play he was consistently the best player. Assuming the medical reports check out he should be the pick all day.
No Dickinson on your list?I think Schaefer will be #1 unanymous in large part because Misa stumbled in the POs, Martone has fallen out of #1 contention and hagens seems to as well. Seems to me that Misa was the only real #1 contender but his PO performance hurts that alot.
Who knows! I just hope the sharks get schaefer as they could really use one more top end D prospect alongside dick. Pohlcamp, Cagnoni, Thompson, and Mukh are intriguing but im not sure any of them are future top pairing guys. Be nice to get another one of those in the system.
Literally right before your bold started.No Dickinson on your list?![]()
You have to capitalize names or you will be infracted.Literally right before your bold started.
There should be a few big RDs available there. We just need some bodies who might become bottom or middle pair. Amico, Fiddler, Limatov (LD). Admittedly I haven't been as on top of the mid to late round this year vs last.Besides the #1 pick, the Sharks also hold the #28 selection. If it's not traded, who should the Sharks target, given their organizational needs—particularly on defense and in goal?
search for Defense and Forwards rd 1-4 and goalies for round 5-7There should be a few big RDs available there. We just need some bodies who might become bottom or middle pair. Amico, Fiddler, Limatov (LD). Admittedly I haven't been as on top of the mid to late round this year vs last.
I also think it's a toss up whether we use the pick or package it in a trade.
Rank | Name | Readiness | Notes |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | Pyotr Andreyanov | ★★★★☆ (2–3 yrs) | Best numbers, mature play |
![]() | Alexei Medvedev | ★★★☆☆ (3–4 yrs) | Strong OHL season |
![]() | Semyon Frolov | ★★★☆☆ (3–4 yrs) | Great tools, small sample |
![]() | Jack Ivankovic | ★★☆☆☆ (3–5 yrs) | Smaller, quick goalie |
![]() | Joshua Ravensbergen | ★★☆☆☆ (4–5 yrs) | Huge frame, needs polish, 6'5 frame |
![]() | Love Härenstam | ★☆☆☆☆ (5+ yrs) | Developmental project |
I think if we missed out on Schaefer, we'll have picked a forward so as previously discussed, you'd want to look at trade up options if Hensler is still around in the 20 range.A list of dudes I want at 28th and 33rd:
Unlikely:
Malcolm Spence
Blake Fiddler
Kashawn Aitcheson
Braeden Cootes
Realistic:
Cole McKinney
Henry Brzustewicz
Carter Amico
Bill Zonnon
Shane Vansaghi
Ben Kindel
Jack Murtagh
Cameron Schmidt
There are a bunch of RHD candidates that seem appropriate for the Sens' 2nd down in the early 50's too, I kinda like having a pick there:
Charlie Trethewey
Sean Barnhill
Quinn Beauchesne
David Bedkowski
Peyton Kettles
Carlos Handal
Alex Huang
And of course Luca Radivojevic and Anthony Cristoforo would be good mid-round shots.
In the end, I wonder how high these guys will go. The RHD premium seems more intense these days, as I genuinely can't find more than 50 actually decent RHD in the NHL right now.
I think I'd try to use the OTT 2nd to trade up for a chance at Aitcheson personally.A list of dudes I want at 28th and 33rd:
Unlikely:
Malcolm Spence
Blake Fiddler
Kashawn Aitcheson
Braeden Cootes
Realistic:
Cole McKinney
Henry Brzustewicz
Carter Amico
Bill Zonnon
Shane Vansaghi
Ben Kindel
Jack Murtagh
Cameron Schmidt
There are a bunch of RHD candidates that seem appropriate for the Sens' 2nd down in the early 50's too, I kinda like having a pick there:
Charlie Trethewey
Sean Barnhill
Quinn Beauchesne
David Bedkowski
Peyton Kettles
Carlos Handal
Alex Huang
And of course Luca Radivojevic and Anthony Cristoforo would be good mid-round shots.
In the end, I wonder how high these guys will go. The RHD premium seems more intense these days, as I genuinely can't find more than 50 actually decent RHD in the NHL right now.
I like Aitcheson but not enough to move up for him.I think I'd try to use the OTT 2nd to trade up for a chance at Aitcheson personally.
A list of dudes I want at 28th and 33rd:
Unlikely:
Malcolm Spence
Blake Fiddler
Kashawn Aitcheson
Braeden Cootes
Realistic:
Cole McKinney
Henry Brzustewicz
Carter Amico
Bill Zonnon
Shane Vansaghi
Ben Kindel
Jack Murtagh
Cameron Schmidt
There are a bunch of RHD candidates that seem appropriate for the Sens' 2nd down in the early 50's too, I kinda like having a pick there:
Charlie Trethewey
Sean Barnhill
Quinn Beauchesne
David Bedkowski
Peyton Kettles
Carlos Handal
Alex Huang
And of course Luca Radivojevic and Anthony Cristoforo would be good mid-round shots.
In the end, I wonder how high these guys will go. The RHD premium seems more intense these days, as I genuinely can't find more than 50 actually decent RHD in the NHL right now.
What do you like about Nesbitt?Nesbitt with the Dallas pick
Bedkowski is someone I mentioned before with the Sens pick
I'm undecided with what do do or whom to pick, with our own 2nd
If Hensler is available in the late teens, I would try and move up for him.I haven’t followed this prospect class nearly as closely as I have others in the past and I know you definitely do your homework. Curious of your opinion on Hensler? It seems like his stock dropped way off over the course of a year. Is he just not as good as scouts once thought? Is he worth trading up for since he’s a RD?
What do you like about Nesbitt?
If Hensler is available in the late teens, I would try and move up for him.
He's actually played pretty well in the second half, but I think his perceived upside looks pretty capped at middle-pairing. He'll still go in the teens because he's a RHD with good size and skating and those types always go early. If he was a lefty, he probably doesn't go in the first round, because decent middle-pairing LHD are a dime a dozen.
Yes, he would hopefully fill a real needWhat do you like about Nesbitt?
If Hensler is available in the late teens, I would try and move up for him.
He's actually played pretty well in the second half, but I think his perceived upside looks pretty capped at middle-pairing. He'll still go in the teens because he's a RHD with good size and skating and those types always go early. If he was a lefty, he probably doesn't go in the first round, because decent middle-pairing LHD are a dime a dozen.
Huge deal. Magic number now at 9, with 6 games to go for the sharks and 5 for the Hawks. Actually at 8 because of the tiebreaker situation, I think. So four Sharks losses OR Hawks wins and we've clinched worst.Hawks with a win just now. Nice cushion