Middle six Martone would still be more valuable than middle six Misa or Hagens, both to the team and via trade. His size and RH shot are rarer traits than anything the other two have going for them so if their NHL production/impact ends up in the same range we're going to want Martone especially given the makeup of our core forwards. Misa is probably the safest pick of the three with the lowest risk of being an outright bust. But should we really be prioritizing downside risk over potential upside with a top 3 pick?