theguardianII
Registered User
- Jan 30, 2020
- 3,299
- 2,112
Trade Pettersson to the Islanders for 1rst overall and select Misa. Make it work for both teams
Not a fan of Ben Kindell?With the release of Elite Prospect's draft guide, I've been able to continue work on my list of interesting players from this draft.
Link to the spreadsheet if anyone is interested.
if he drops to 12 would you trade to move up? what would you be willing to give up?McQueen is the dream, but cannot imagine he gets to 15, maybe 12 or lower but 12th,13th,14th all likely to take him.
Unlikely the Canucks make this selection but they should based on the names that'll still be available, lots of impact players that'll be on an ELC if you're patient.
Not a fan of Ben Kindell?
Pronman had Carter Bear in his latest mock draft going 15th
it depends how high we regard him as. willing to add a 3rd, and a prospect not named Myinio, Willander or Lekkermaki.if he drops to 12 would you trade to move up? what would you be willing to give up?
thank you for taking your time and putting this list together. I know something like this is not easy to do and takes time.With the release of Elite Prospect's draft guide, I've been able to continue work on my list of interesting players from this draft.
Link to the spreadsheet if anyone is interested.
Bear barely missed the 2007 cutoff (48 days) – hardly a red flag. Scouts rate his offensive skill higher than Martin, Reschney, Cootes, or Kindel. He generates 4.5+ high-danger chances nightly. Yes, Dupont's influence is a factor, but right now, Bear is an offensive machine. Plus, he's a physical checker who finishes hits. Drafting him at 15th would be awesome.I'm a bit concerned about his achilles injury. I was really high on Krebs in his draft year and he didn't pan out. Bear is also an older prospect.
thank you for taking your time and putting this list together. I know something like this is not easy to do and takes time.
from what I read about Jackson smith, hes actually not an offensive dman, and more of a 2way guy as far as I know.
For what it’s worth his Achilles injury was not a full tear but a partial tear and apparently he’s back on the ice and expected to be ready for whatever development camp his team may have.Ethan's nephew.
I'm a bit concerned about his achilles injury. I was really high on Krebs in his draft year and he didn't pan out. Bear is also an older prospect.
Bear is a great prospect who most likely will do very well in the NHL, if he is there and even if other centers are there that I like the Canucks need to take a good hard look.Bear barely missed the 2007 cutoff (48 days) – hardly a red flag. Scouts rate his offensive skill higher than Martin, Reschney, Cootes, or Kindel. He generates 4.5+ high-danger chances nightly. Yes, Dupont's influence is a factor, but right now, Bear is an offensive machine. Plus, he's a physical checker who finishes hits. Drafting him at 15th would be awesome.
Bear is a great prospect who most likely will do very well in the NHL, if he is there and even if other centers are there that I like the Canucks need to take a good hard look.
Frankly I doubt he drops to 15h though.
Good writeup on him here.
![]()
2025 NHL Draft Prospect Profile: Carter Bear
Upside Hockey's NHL Draft profile series: Aces Edition, Vol. 9upsidehockey.substack.com
AI summaries of other articles are not acceptable to post here as they do not fully link back to the source articles. As per Rule 6;
6) Streams/Copyrighted Material/Illegal Topics:
Do not post any of the following:
• Links to or requests for links to illegal streams
• Discussions of illegal streaming services or proxies
• Large portions of ANY article. The reader must have incentive to visit the source.
• Excerpts from any publication without providing editorial commentary
• Discussions of piracy techniques
I'm most intrigued with Lakovic for guys plausibly in the 15 range. And I don't think anyone would ever mistake me for the guy hollering to just take the big guy. Almost always I've been advocating drafting smaller players with better scoring profiles.
But, am I missing something here? Production is solid. He is huge. And not just for a guy his size, relative to anyone in the class, he has plus hands, shot, and skating. I've read different reports that like his passing and transition game. Very interesting package.
If he hits his ceiling, he could be the "unicorn" type of playoff player.
I know he had an issue and suspension for an undisclosed "off-ice" incident. Some kind of unsaid character concerns?
I'm not saying it is a red flag but it is something to consider. Like Tij Iginla is about 3 months older and had a much more impressive 23-24 season. And I note that if memory serves Iginla ranked ~#9/10. I think Bear is a good prospect but if we're relying on his offensive production we should consider the fact that he's an older prospect.Bear barely missed the 2007 cutoff (48 days) – hardly a red flag.
That’s why he went six in a stronger draft and bear is a good pick up at 15.I'm not saying it is a red flag but it is something to consider. Like Tij Iginla is about 3 months older and had a much more impressive 23-24 season. And I note that if memory serves Iginla ranked ~#9/10. I think Bear is a good prospect but if we're relying on his offensive production we should consider the fact that he's an older prospect.
This my concern as well but frankly I've been concentrating more on centers as its a huge need for our system and frankly Lakovic just doesn't inspire me with his size not being utilized.Main downside, according to Elite Prospects, is that he doesn’t effectively use his size and is rather soft.
Physical skills are the biggest question with Lakovic. He has the size and skating to play a power forward game, but he’s moreof an open-ice skill player. He ends up on the outside of too many battles, struggles to control contact along the walls, and is largely ineffective on the forecheck. Becoming a mean player isn’t necessary, but he will have to learn to use his frame better to win and protect pucks to create cycle offence in the NHL.
He had pretty good production the year before in Everett where older players got bigger roles and the skillset is more important than anything else.I'm not saying it is a red flag but it is something to consider. Like Tij Iginla is about 3 months older and had a much more impressive 23-24 season. And I note that if memory serves Iginla ranked ~#9/10. I think Bear is a good prospect but if we're relying on his offensive production we should consider the fact that he's an older prospect.
I've got the EP Guide too. They rate his other skills very highly, so combined with the size I am surprised he is not a top-10 pick.Main downside, according to Elite Prospects, is that he doesn’t effectively use his size and is rather soft.
Physical skills are the biggest question with Lakovic. He has the size and skating to play a power forward game, but he’s moreof an open-ice skill player. He ends up on the outside of too many battles, struggles to control contact along the walls, and is largely ineffective on the forecheck. Becoming a mean player isn’t necessary, but he will have to learn to use his frame better to win and protect pucks to create cycle offence in the NHL.
I hope so too, if anything just to make draft day more exciting and seeing if anyone falls to the Canucks.I hope the Canucks make a pick at 15 this year.
Especially after the year the Protas' just had.I've got the EP Guide too. They rate his other skills very highly, so combined with the size I am surprised he is not a top-10 pick.
Seems like part of his issue with physical play is that he's kinda tall/gangly and hasn't filled in. 6'4 190 is very thin. That seems like something that can pretty easily be corrected, and he already has all the other tools.