Beliveau
It's clobberin time!🥊
Agreed. After the 80s they've basically done nothing with horrible GMs.... Let them bang their chests, they have such an embarrassing franchise the hockey gods just felt bad.
Agreed. After the 80s they've basically done nothing with horrible GMs.... Let them bang their chests, they have such an embarrassing franchise the hockey gods just felt bad.
The draft is always N-1 picks deep, with N = where the Rangers' first pick is.Ive been posting here for about 10 years on and off, and without fail next year's draft is always generational.
Came here to ask this basically...I just took a look at the photos of all 40 potential 1st rounders and I can tell you this year is a massive bust when it comes to alpha personalities that will become a true superstar. You really have a pool of Yakupovs and shane Wrights. This is undoubtedly the ugliest 1st rounders I’ve ever seen and I’ve been in the business longer than Bob McKenzie. Give up this year’s 1st rounder is my choice.
Yes.Came here to ask this basically...
Realistically who could we nab at 12? Are they even worth it?
You have a point about generational.The word generational makes me nauseous. Two players can have a nine year age difference and both be called it. That's not what it means.
Same with superstar. There can't be more than one at a time but it's used to describe any AS. That's not what it means.
even if they get the 1st overall pick lmaoThe draft is always N-1 picks deep, with N = where the Rangers' first pick is.
Yes.
Someone always drops.
I don't know who it will be but McRanger just posted this, you can get a good player at 12.
Yes.
Someone always drops.
I don't know who it will be but McRanger just posted this, you can get a good player at 12.
I’m good with any of Martin, Steve McQueen, or Smith. One of those guys has to be there at 12, right? Right??
AAAAAAAAANNNNNNNNNDDDDDD... BingoScout better and over time it shouldn't matter if we draft 12th or 21st.
Yes.
Someone always drops.
I don't know who it will be but McRanger just posted this, you can get a good player at 12.
Yea, they probably should have started in in 2017One of those players is not like the others.
So which is generational: (drafted in the same year) Crosby OR Ovie? Or McDavid?You have a point about generational.
What about the word "superstar" implies only one at a time?
You could make that argument as well.So which is generational: (drafted in the same year) Crosby OR Ovie? Or McDavid?
I agree sometimes terms get watered down, but "generational" to me doesn't mean "only one in a twenty year span."
Yes.
Someone always drops.
I don't know who it will be but McRanger just posted this, you can get a good player at 12.
Yeah, I definitely agree.You could make that argument as well.
I'm just saying that "geerational" has some sort of limiting implication whereas "superstar" does not.
In terms of player quality or sexual predation?One of those players is not like the others.