Dont think eklund has a chance or being there but we'll see
I Like Nesbitt's upside.... bear his injury would scare me off. Aitcheson is already a year older than most guys
Not counting anyone out at 12 and I'd have to look more into everyone but right now I think my preference is to trade the pick or move back. Course I'd wait till the pick comes to us and see what's on the board first
Dont think eklund has a chance or being there but we'll see
I Like Nesbitt's upside.... bear his injury would scare me off. Aitcheson is already a year older than most guys
Not counting anyone out at 12 and I'd have to look more into everyone but right now I think my preference is to trade the pick or move back. Course I'd wait till the pick comes to us and see what's on the board first
Nesbitt is less skill and physical Conor Geekie.i don't believe Eklund and Smith will be available, but Lakovic possible, he is third on my least
There are also guys that show up good at current U18, so expect big rating swings . Bear injury could effect his skating, but he still could be as good as Bert.
My hope is that Detroit goes away from Draper's love of high floor low ceiling good character players and goes for high ceiling higher risk player. Detroit is still in desperate need of elite offensive talent.
My hope is that Detroit goes away from Draper's love of high floor low ceiling good character players and goes for high ceiling higher risk player. Detroit is still in desperate need of elite offensive talent.
He is only doing it in the first round and trying to get your type in the later rounds, Lombardi, Plante, Finnie , Becher. Last draft I was hoping for Hage, but MBN also not a bad choice , especially at playoffs
My hope is that Detroit goes away from Draper's love of high floor low ceiling good character players and goes for high ceiling higher risk player. Detroit is still in desperate need of elite offensive talent.
Jack Nesbitt is a guy that goes late 1st or even later in an average draft year. I think he maxes out as a 3rd liner. There isn’t a single above average tool in his game except size.
Was looking at the draft and noticed Pittsburgh have picks 9 and then 63 ... ducks 8th and then 64
Any chance we move the 44th pick for #8 or 9?? Knowing yzerman he probably sticks but depending who's there and seeing our prospect pool I'd have 0 problem trading that pick to move up
Was looking at the draft and noticed Pittsburgh have picks 9 and then 63 ... ducks 8th and then 64
Any chance we move the 44th pick for #8 or 9?? Knowing yzerman he probably sticks but depending who's there and seeing our prospect pool I'd have 0 problem trading that pick to move up
Jack Nesbitt is a guy that goes late 1st or even later in an average draft year. I think he maxes out as a 3rd liner. There isn’t a single above average tool in his game except size.
IQ is getting praised by all and he's not complete package yet. Nesbitt is rising the rankings, who cares where he would go in some other year. This year he'll be mid 1st round pick.
IQ is getting praised by all and he's not complete package yet. Nesbitt is rising the rankings, who cares where he would go in some other year. This year he'll be mid 1st round pick.
He’s ranked #15 North American prospect and most rankings have him in the 30s overall.
Nesbitt is a worse version of Matthew Wood or Conor Geekie at the draft. Or a less mean version of Nathan Gaucher. Hes just very vanilla to me, and I’d rather trade the pick than spend it on a Rasmussen equivalent.
IQ is getting praised by all and he's not complete package yet. Nesbitt is rising the rankings, who cares where he would go in some other year. This year he'll be mid 1st round pick.
Jack Nesbitt is a guy that goes late 1st or even later in an average draft year. I think he maxes out as a 3rd liner. There isn’t a single above average tool in his game except size.
I don't see how average draft years are relevant given that this isn't an average draft year. I personally think he is smarter than your average bear, especially without the puck. I think I like others more, but I am not sure the others I like more project to be more than NHL 3rd liners either. This part of the draft is just really forgettable.
From a few days ago ... Wozniak looks to have a good shot ... gastrin got a goal, looked bigger to me than when I checked his stats, wouldn’t be against trading back this yr
im super high on center depth wth good size n big bodied d . the centers dont need to be highly talented if theyre two way strong because yzerman will dig up the rat wingers later rounds to do the scoring
He’s ranked #15 North American prospect and most rankings have him in the 30s overall.
Nesbitt is a worse version of Matthew Wood or Conor Geekie at the draft. Or a less mean version of Nathan Gaucher. Hes just very vanilla to me, and I’d rather trade the pick than spend it on a Rasmussen equivalent.
Bobby Margarita has him at 23, at the moment and Button has him at 24th, Sportsnet guys 15th and 17th.
Based on what?
Gaucher was 207 lbs when he was drafted and he is 207 now as well, Gaucher was physically mature kid with no room to grow. Gaucher peaked early and used that fully grown male physique to dominate in the junior league. Nesbitt 183, lots of room to grow and i didn't any scouting report that say anything about Gaucher's IQ, where in Nesbitt that is always mentioned and often praised.
Geekie is better comparison but what makes Nesbitt worse version? Geekie was described as poor skater and bad defensively, Nesbitt needs to improve his skating but he's never described as "poor skater". And defensively Nesbitt is better and clearly more physical. As it was said to describe Geekie defensively:
He’s frequently the last forward back and can get caught chasing the puck in the zone, or he takes long wide turns up ice and can get caught out of position. He also lacks consistency in his defensive game, often looking to cheat up ice in search of offensive chances, or he gets caught sleeping, gliding around the defensive zone, losing his man.
Wood was also physically more mature than Nesbitt but Nesbitt is more physical, and Wood is more offensive oriented than Nesbitt. And by the looks of it Wood is more of a winger than pure center. Not very good comparison.
Rasmussen comparison is absolutely ridiculous. Nesbitt has high hockey IQ, which Ras has none. Nesbitt is physical, which Ras is not. Nesbitt can win FOs, which Ras cannot. Ras was physically mature, he peaked at 18. Nesbitt still has room to grow and develop.
-----------------------------------------------
So was Brayden Point, skating can be improved. And should be improved but he is not described as bad skater anywhere, but in the need of improvement. But that's natural, he's 18-years old whom had growth spurt recently.
Adam Kimelman - NHL.com - February 21st: "Nesbitt, who is a good skater and a strong presence at the net on the power play. Nesbitt skates well and has a frame that looks capable of holding more muscle. If he can fill out without losing the elusiveness and speed he has playing with the puck, he projects to be a top-six option.
“Jack Nesbitt is a prototypical power forward center with an impressive combination of size, skating ability, and a developing offensive skillset. At 6’4″, his frame and reach make him a challenging matchup for opponents, especially when he uses his body to protect the puck rather than exposing the puck trying to make high risk plays.” – Neutral Zone
“Jack Nesbitt is a promising young talent with the potential to make an impact in the NHL. His combination of size, skating ability, hockey IQ, and playmaking skills make him an attractive prospect for teams looking to bolster their center depth.” – Dominic Tiano, OHL Writers
Nesbitt is a smooth, powerful skater with long strides that allow him to cover the ice quickly. While his first-step explosiveness could improve, his top-end speed and balance are strengths.
His agility and edge work are solid for a player his size, allowing him to adjust well in transition and contribute offensively. - neutralzone.com
While Nesbitt’s skating is strong overall, improving his first three steps would allow him to capitalize on loose pucks, accelerate out of traffic, and better separate from defenders on the rush. - neutralzone.com
Skating: Despite his size, Nesbitt is an agile skater with good speed, acceleration and impressive edge work. His ability to move quickly and change directions makes him a versatile player in both offensive and defensive situations. - OHL Writers
Just finished watching Canada - Finland game, Draper and 1 other scout was present. No sight of Stevie.
I put Nesbitt under microscope and this is what i saw.
- Likes to hit, i counted 8 hits in the game.
- I counted 2 takeaways, neutralzone.com has counted 4.8 per game average in OHL.
- Mauls bodies in puck battles, slashes, crosschecks to lower back, really making the opponent pay the price.
- Active on forecheck.
- 1st steps needs improvement, skating is not bad once he gets it going. But that engine needs to start faster.
- More muscle, once that and those 1st steps been improved. Absolute freight train.
- Strong puck protector, wide shoulders and long arms. Looks taller than 6'3".
- Directs traffic in the D-zone. Every time there is chance points spots for the linemates to cover.
Just finished watching Canada - Finland game, Draper and 1 other scout was present. No sight of Stevie.
I put Nesbitt under microscope and this is what i saw.
- Likes to hit, i counted 8 hits in the game.
- I counted 2 takeaways, neutralzone.com has counted 4.8 per game average in OHL.
- Mauls bodies in puck battles, slashes, crosschecks to lower back, really making the opponent pay the price.
- Active on forecheck.
- 1st steps needs improvement, skating is not bad once he gets it going. But that engine needs to start faster.
- More muscle, once that and those 1st steps been improved. Absolute freight train.
- Strong puck protector, wide shoulders and long arms. Looks taller than 6'3".
- Directs traffic in the D-zone. Every time there is chance points spots for the linemates to cover.
Nice write up. Thanks for sharing. I like hearing that he’s “mauling bodies.” We need more of that up front. Also like hearing that he’s adept at takeaways. Not always, but that skill is often a harbinger of production at the next level as long as the kid has enough skill to take advantage of the opportunities takeaways yield. Still have some reservations at 12 though.
Also, FWIW, he’s listed on some sites as 6’4” so he likely is actually bigger than 6’3”.
Just finished watching Canada - Finland game, Draper and 1 other scout was present. No sight of Stevie.
I put Nesbitt under microscope and this is what i saw.
- Likes to hit, i counted 8 hits in the game.
- I counted 2 takeaways, neutralzone.com has counted 4.8 per game average in OHL.
- Mauls bodies in puck battles, slashes, crosschecks to lower back, really making the opponent pay the price.
- Active on forecheck.
- 1st steps needs improvement, skating is not bad once he gets it going. But that engine needs to start faster.
- More muscle, once that and those 1st steps been improved. Absolute freight train.
- Strong puck protector, wide shoulders and long arms. Looks taller than 6'3".
- Directs traffic in the D-zone. Every time there is chance points spots for the linemates to cover.
Thanks for the write up, it is appreciated. One question: do you feel confident he's a center in the NHL, or is he more likely to play on the wing? Not necessarily an issue for me, just curious.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
2,3,4
