WeThreeKings
Habs cup - its in the BAG
Would seem like a good pick with of our 3rds.
Frolov, Hood, Neueunschwander.
Would seem like a good pick with of our 3rds.
My answer is the hockey part with Lakovic is the easy part. You like him or you don't... Then comes the hard part. Is Montreal ready to go through another Logan Mailloux fiasco? Bergevin's stock cratered and it sullied the organization.Wow great job Simon St-Laurent, couldnt have done a better job than that at breaking down the player, spot on all points.
Waiting for @WeThreeKings @le_sean @Kennerback reactions or counter arguments. .![]()
Wow great job Simon St-Laurent, couldnt have done a better job than that at breaking down the player, spot on all points.
Waiting for @WeThreeKings @le_sean @Kennerback reactions or counter arguments. .![]()
I really like Simon St-Laurent but he's being generous here. He criticized Prokhorov for passing on a pulverizing check a single time out of 10. For Lakovic zilch for not taking the body 10 times out of 10.I've got nothing more to say on the matter. Never said he was lazy. Said he is a perimeter skill guy in a big body and I'm not interested in teaching him how to play inside or use his size to his advantage. It rarely works out that you can turn a sheep into a lion.
I'm high on Lakovic and in agreement with most of what he said in this particular video, but I'm generally not a huge fan of his videos.I really like Simon St-Laurent but he's being generous here. He criticized Prokhorov for passing on a pulverizing check a single time out of 10. For Lakovic zilch for not taking the body 10 times out of 10.
Seems like Habs really like Mrtka, if they don't move up to draft him, I think they'll take a RHD in the first 2 rounds.
What did they say about Mrtka?
Habs said nothing.What did they say about Mrtka?
he watches the prospects throughout the year so when he makes the video at the end of course he already has a preformed opinion of the player. What do you mean by narrative? Like an opinion of a player? You're watching his video for his opinion on the player, if you want a shift by shift breakdown you can pay for them through instat i believe or some other service.I'm high on Lakovic and in agreement with most of what he said in this particular video, but I'm generally not a huge fan of his videos.
He tends to already have a narrative in mind, then finds clips to suit that narrative rather than let it be organic.
I could easily find you 20 clips of Cole Caufield whiffing shots to paint the picture he's a bad shooter, which is basically what he did in his McQueen video.
I still find value in consuming as much information as possible, even from Grant, but I much prefer Simon Servant's style of videos.
Just let 2-3 games of shift-by-shift video roll while you talk about the prospect and what you've seen over the year. Even if I disagree with the takes, at least I can watch the unedited tape for myself and make my own judgment.
If the Habs want either of those guys, they'll at minimum have to get ahead of Pittsburgh
He doesn't show the good and the bad, or the inconsistencies. He only shows the good OR the bad depending on his bias for a particular player trait.he watches the prospects throughout the year so when he makes the video at the end of course he already has a preformed opinion of the player. What do you mean by narrative? Like an opinion of a player? You're watching his video for his opinion on the player, if you want a shift by shift breakdown you can pay for them through instat i believe or some other service.
12 has been traded to the Pens.Turns out the Canucks, Jackets, Preds and Flames are in win now mode (???) And are shopping their picks. Habs probably keep their picks now that there's too much supply.
Sharks 2 30
Hawks 3 25
Preds 5 23 26
Flyers 6 22 32
Canucks 12* 15
Jackets 14 20
Habs 16 17
Flames 18 31
Who would be your targets if Preds/Flyers?
Something tells me that discussions mostly happen when we were picking from 5 to 10......I f***ing knew it man
Get him
It’s still conditionally owned by the Rangers, they can decide to keep it and forfeit their unprotected 2026 1st which would be dumb IMO. Hopefully they let it go to the Pens as that’s one of our best chances to trade up12 has been traded to the Pens.
Yes, it's either the Rangers or the Pens, but it can't be the Canucks.It’s still conditionally owned by the Rangers, they can decide to keep it and forfeit their unprotected 2026 1st which would be dumb IMO. Hopefully they let it go to the Pens as that’s one of our best chances to trade up
We have ammo.Something tells me that discussions mostly happen when we were picking from 5 to 10......
We don't need to invest that much in a partner for Hutson, he'll elevate whoeve we put him with and that pair won't have significant defensive responsibility anyway.We have ammo.