HF Habs: - 2025 Draft Combine | Page 2 | HFBoards - NHL Message Board and Forum for National Hockey League

HF Habs: 2025 Draft Combine

The answer Habs wants to hear : I couldn't see him, I'm not going to the Casino at such an hour.
They would just rephrase the question if that was the answer because they aren't looking for someone who wriggles their way out. The goal of these things isn't about giving a right/wrong answer it's about the thought process you use to make a decision.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Canadienna
They would just rephrase the question if that was the answer because they aren't looking for someone who wriggles their way out. The goal of these things isn't about giving a right/wrong answer it's about the thought process you use to make a decision.
Wouldn't the right answer be I don't gamble but if I did .....
 
They would just rephrase the question if that was the answer because they aren't looking for someone who wriggles their way out. The goal of these things isn't about giving a right/wrong answer it's about the thought process you use to make a decision.

It's like trying to do the trolly problem with somebody who won't do abstraction. "I would untie the people and set them all free before the train comes!"
 
Wouldn't the right answer be I don't gamble but if I did .....
Then it becomes you are walking down the street and see Suzuki leave the casino, or they overhear Suzuki talking about how he was gambling at 3am, or whatever else.

But like I said there isn't a right/wrong answer, I think what you want to see is the player ask questions like is this in the offseason, regular season, playoffs? Was there a curfew that was being broken? Was this the first time something like this happened or is it a pattern and shows that it's a real problem?

There is no right/wrong answer because there are good and bad no matter what you do. It's about the reasoning you use, if the answer is no because he's the C that's not good reasoning, but if the answer is no because if you rat out Suzuki it would cause internal strife and you think it's a better idea to get some teammates together and handle it amongst the players without management getting involved that's a better reason.
 
But it is an answer, too, so why not try to be that clean?

Lol, nothing wrong with it. But I agree with the other poster that they would rephrase the question to force you to answer for that scenario.

I just find it funny when people try to find any possible way to avoid having to deal with the moral themes of the trolley problem or the Habs draft Q.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Ad

Ad