LJReborn
Registered User
- Mar 24, 2025
- 419
- 775
I guess there is always one.I have seen at least one pundit say Eklund's hockey sense was a weakness. It seems ok to me from the clips I saw.
I guess there is always one.I have seen at least one pundit say Eklund's hockey sense was a weakness. It seems ok to me from the clips I saw.
Too bad Scott Stevens who went 5th overall wasn't hyped up more. Bruins having him in '88 and '90 finals would've been huge plus when St. Louis offer sheeted him we would've got 3 or 4 first round picks back like Washington did.Bellows was tabbed "The Next One" (Gretzky) before the draft. No one expected Kluzak to be picked.
As one would expect, Kluzak's career was over early due to a bad knee.
And Bellows turned out to be way over-hyped. A very good player, but hardly the Next One.
He was not well developed when he came into the league. I remember his rookie year. I was surprised he was picked as high as he was, but he certainly developed into an elite defensive dman.Too bad Scott Stevens who went 5th overall wasn't hyped up more. Bruins having him in '88 and '90 finals would've been huge plus when St. Louis offer sheeted him we would've got 3 or 4 first round picks back like Washington did.
no sure who it was but that comparsion to me is terrible. Holtz had an elite shot, questionable skating / hockey sense and effort. Eklund has those last three in spades plus he led his men's team in goals. Holtz was a great goal scorer in the SHL and I would love the Bruins to grab him this summer, but Eklund to me will flourish as an all around guy who could play 2nd line wing for fifteen years.
agree. eklund reminds me of travis konecny, seth jarvis type guys.no sure who it was but that comparsion to me is terrible. Holtz had an elite shot, questionable skating / hockey sense and effort. Eklund has those last three in spades plus he led his men's team in goals. Holtz was a great goal scorer in the SHL and I would love the Bruins to grab him this summer, but Eklund to me will flourish as an all around guy who could play 2nd line wing for fifteen years.
Nice comp, I will gladly take a 25-30 goal scoring winger at 7.agree. eklund reminds me of travis konecny, seth jarvis type guys.
He was not well developed when he came into the league. I remember his rookie year. I was surprised he was picked as high as he was, but he certainly developed into an elite defensive dman.
Not sure what his ranking would be for McQueen, but an 18 year old with a bad back is not a road I would travel.Avoid McQueen, not sure of Martin either, O'Brien is growing on me.
Not sure what his ranking would be for McQueen, but an 18 year old with a bad back is not a road I would travel.
I believe the "Next One" was Brian LawtonBellows was tabbed "The Next One" (Gretzky) before the draft. No one expected Kluzak to be picked.
As one would expect, Kluzak's career was over early due to a bad knee.
And Bellows turned out to be way over-hyped. A very good player, but hardly the Next One.
I certainly am not an 18 year oldagain tho, no surgery, way less of a concern
teens can grow fast and have back problems but that can be alleviated once the body normalizes and you've done strength training and PT
if he has a condition that's specific tho, that's a different concern all together
Lot of assumptions here - three major ones
How much time have you put into watching the videos and reading scouting services
I certainly am not an 18 year oldbut back injuries at any age can be concerning, I know, and I would hope at 18 that there is no rush to surgery. I do hope no matter who takes him that strength training and PT is the answer.
Idk about assumptions but saying McQueen will be the only homerun pick left at 7 is certainly a take. I wouldn't take him in the top 20 and people here vastly overrate his offensive ability. He might have great hands but he doesn't put up the numbers and seems to have about as much drive as a snail does.what assumptions have been made?
I had been reading about Brian Bellows all year in The Hockey News. Still SMH we took a D with a bad knee. Needed to replace Brad McCrimmon. UghThe draft was on WBZ and IIRC, I broke things when Harry called his name. After all the issues with Orr's and Park's knees, I wanted no part of Kluzak. Nothing personal, just didn't want a d-man with bad knees, and for once I was right. Well, there was that other time when I said that Ryan Leaf would be a better NFL QB than Peyton Manning. Sure got that one right. ;-)
When Stevens was a rookie in Kitchener back in the day they use to haze the new guys. No one would touch hum out of fear. Tough as nails.Too bad Scott Stevens who went 5th overall wasn't hyped up more. Bruins having him in '88 and '90 finals would've been huge plus when St. Louis offer sheeted him we would've got 3 or 4 first round picks back like Washington did.
What a bust Lawton was!I believe the "Next One" was Brian Lawton
Victor Eklund and Anton Frondell are highly touted Swedish hockey prospects, and both have been praised for their playmaking abilities and goal-scoring potential. While Frondell is known for his dynamic offensive style and high-end scoring tools, Eklund is considered a well-rounded player with a high compete level and strong fundamental skills. Many scouts see Eklund as the more polished and complete player, while Frondell's potential is still being unlocked.
Here's a more detailed comparison:
Victor Eklund:
Anton Frondell:
- Strengths:
Strong skater, particularly on his edges and along the boards; high compete level; good stick work; puck protection; offensive awareness; playmaking abilities; good hands; excellent vision.- Weaknesses:
Not a "purely fast" skater, but his skating deficiencies are compensated for by his high compete level and other skills.
Comparison:
- Strengths:
Excellent goal-scoring ability; can dangle opponents; high-end shot and physical ability; .- Weaknesses:
Transition play remains a big weakness; hasn't fully unlocked his potential yet.
In conclusion, both Eklund and Frondell are exciting prospects with the potential to become NHL stars, but Eklund is arguably a more polished and versatile player at this stage.
- Draft Positioning:
Eklund is generally considered a slightly higher-ranked prospect, according to some draft boards, but both are highly regarded and likely to be drafted in the first round.- Line Dynamics:
The two players have often been seen as linemates, and their play together has showcased their complementary skill sets.- Overall:
Eklund is a more complete player with stronger fundamentals, while Frondell's raw talent and scoring ability are undeniable.
This video provides a comparison between Victor Eklund and Anton Frondell:
Have you actually seen them play enough to make this evaluation of them or is just from watching you-tube clips, because i haven't seen this at all.IMO, Frondell's success was largely attributed to playing with Eklund, not the other way around.
I have not watched them in person, have watched games that I streamed.Have you actually seen them play enough to make this evaluation of them or is just from watching you-tube clips, because i haven't seen this at all.
The mother of a good buddy of mine actually used to babysit Stevens when she was a teenager. Apparently he was a handful as a kid too.When Stevens was a rookie in Kitchener back in the day they use to haze the new guys. No one would touch hum out of fear. Tough as nails.
Ive only watched a few games of both players,so im not really one to ask.lolI have not watched them in person, have watched games that I streamed.
What is your opinion?