DaaaaB's
Registered User
- Apr 24, 2004
- 8,673
- 2,915
my dude, that video is literally from a multi-day league-wide event where some of the best sports scientists in the world and NHL teams are meticulously evaluating the athleticism of prospects.
Kinda like when they traded down and took Mark Stuart and left Zach Parisi, Ryan Getzlaf and Brent Burns on the table? Yeah that worked out really well.Im feeling a trade down and Aitchenson is the guy
I generally avoid doing comparisons but some of these seem way off to me.no one else is thinking theyll go defense at #7? Thats my prediction.
But on the forwards i read about them all. I didnt watch any of their games but i read about all of their playing styles from a lot of sources including here on this site and ive formulated my best case scenario player comp for each of the top 10 prospects (per tankathon)
1. Matthew Schaefer- zach werenski
2. Michael misa- mat barzal
3. Porter martone- patrick hornqvist
4. Caleb desnoyers- ryan johansen
5. James hagens- matt duchene
6. Anton frondell- anze kopitar
7. Jake o brien- bo horvat
8. Jackson smith- tj brodie
9. Victor eklund- joffrey lupul
10. Roger mcqueen- corey perry
Bonus defensemen
1. Radim mrtka- Jamie oleksiak
2. Kashawn aitcheson- matt dumba
3. Logan hensler- jacob slavin
lolI didnt watch any of their games but i read about all of their playing styles from a lot of sources including here on this site and ive formulated my best case scenario player comp for each of the top 10 prospects
Also strange for Donnie to blow Knies when he’s not a center.
How do you evaluate the athleticism of prospects? Brain, speed, size, quickness, agility? My hot take is that Desnoyers is not athletic enough. I’ve been dying to get a response because I want to learn, but so far no one bit. My fear is that the Bruins see French Canadian two-way detailed player = cheat code Patrice Bergeron, while Desnoyers is very smart, but also physically weak, more of a latter year Jean Ratelle. I don’t want them to take Desnoyers. His shoulders are tiny, his bones look weak, his muscles don't look long, so how can he add muscle? Maybe his hips and legs are strong? Pull ups are the funny thing now, but how do you evaluate the athleticism of prospects?
That was a secret signal to the Bruins not to take Brady Martin at #7Asking for a friend:
From 4:00 to 4:30. WTF is that reporter doing with his beard whiskers, eating them?
These are the comparables the players picked for themselves...1. Matthew Schaefer- zach werenski
2. Michael misa- mat barzal
3. Porter martone- patrick hornqvist
4. Caleb desnoyers- ryan johansen
5. James hagens- matt duchene
6. Anton frondell- anze kopitar
7. Jake o brien- bo horvat
8. Jackson smith- tj brodie
9. Victor eklund- joffrey lupul
10. Roger mcqueen- corey perry
Bonus defensemen
1. Radim mrtka- Jamie oleksiak
2. Kashawn aitcheson- matt dumba
3. Logan hensler- jacob slavin
This is what I'm most concerned about. So many weird reaches like your example. I'm bracing myself for a letdown. If I end up not being disappointed, well then, BONUS!Kinda like when they traded down and took Mark Stuart and left Zach Parisi, Ryan Getzlaf and Brent Burns on the table? Yeah that worked out really well.![]()
![]()
2025 NHL Combine results: Top 10 prospects in every drill
The NHL Scouting Combine returned to Buffalo on Saturday, with all 32 teams getting a final opportunity to assess this crop of big-league hopefuls before the 2025 NHL Draft in Los Angeles.www.sportsnet.ca
Joffrey Lupul played at 6’2 210. As odd as it is to pull out Joffrey Lupul as a comparison to literally anyone, having him as a comp for Eklund is pretty hilariousThese are the comparables the players picked for themselves...
1. Matthew Schaefer - Miro Heiskenen
2. Michael Misa - Center version of Kucherov
5. James Hagens - "People see similarities to Jack Hughes"
7. Anton Frondell - Alexander Barkov
8. Jake O'Brien - Wyatt Johnston
9. Victor Eklund - Travis Konecny
I get Marchand vibes from Eklund. The dogged compete level, the ability to beat bigger guys in puck battles with his tenacity combined with high IQ and playmaking ability.Joffrey Lupul played at 6’2 210. As odd as it is to pull out Joffrey Lupul as a comparison to literally anyone, having him as a comp for Eklund is pretty hilarious
It's very impressive in light of his size.Frondell scoring so high on the v02 and the bike tests is very interesting. Didn't know he had that higher than average top 6 C TOI potential.
Didn't Kvartalnov score very high on that v02 test? Just sayin...It's very impressive in light of his size.
If Frondell has anything like the game that Barkov has the team that picks him will be very pleased.These are the comparables the players picked for themselves...
1. Matthew Schaefer - Miro Heiskenen
2. Michael Misa - Center version of Kucherov
5. James Hagens - "People see similarities to Jack Hughes"
7. Anton Frondell - Alexander Barkov
8. Jake O'Brien - Wyatt Johnston
9. Victor Eklund - Travis Konecny
I do as wellI think Frondell is going to be the guy to slide.
Eklund should have said Brad Marchand just to mess with everyoneThese are the comparables the players picked for themselves...
1. Matthew Schaefer - Miro Heiskenen
2. Michael Misa - Center version of Kucherov
5. James Hagens - "People see similarities to Jack Hughes"
7. Anton Frondell - Alexander Barkov
8. Jake O'Brien - Wyatt Johnston
9. Victor Eklund - Travis Konecny
I just saw this after I posted the comment aboveI get Marchand vibes from Eklund. The dogged compete level, the ability to beat bigger guys in puck battles with his tenacity combined with high IQ and playmaking ability.