TheFridge
Registered User
- Mar 20, 2022
- 1,585
- 2,749
and yet, even before donato's individually anomalous 24-25 season, he was on average a more efficient scorer than either at 5v5. considering that the relative all strengths gulf between him and turbo last season was only ~-0.5p/60 while the 5v5 was ~+0.3, that tells me that the difference between the two wasn't really that great, and that your evaluations are oriented towards aesthetics rather than outcome or results.
his season was a statistical anomaly. i fully well expect him to score less than 2.85p/60 next season. rather, if he resigned i would expect him to score somewhere between 1.9 and 2.5, about like i expect from bert and turbo. my point is that even taking away the career year, donato is comparable to bert and turbo in terms of points production efficiency. again: if donato is clearly worse than either of these two players, it has to be for some reason other than point production, and no one has offered me any other satisfying reason so far.
the point i was making is that neither of bert or turbo are known to be exceptional defensive forwards, and that donato is not known to be an exceptionally bad defensive forward. they are all pretty middling. i'd say turbo is probably considered the best, followed by donato and bert. the exact breakdown is neither here nor there, because what's important is i don't think there's anything to indicate that either bert or turbo's defensive contributions are so overaweing as to place them clearly head-and-shoulder above donato when considering their respective all around games.
to me, donato is a hard working middle-six forward who you can be confident will give you somewhere between 15-25 goals 40-60 points in 14 minutes a night. well worth the ~6.25% of the cap bert got, which would place him around a $5.96 mil cap hit this offseason. i do that for 3-5 years no problem. certainly far easier for me to offer him that than offer anyone else on the market $8+mil for 6+ years.
The problem with your analysis is that it doesn't take into account QoC. Teravainen and Bertuzzi have often played top-6 minutes for their teams throughout their careers. Donato has almost exclusively played botom-6 minutes. Teravainen and Bertuzzi would have faced significantly better players in those roles throughout their careers than Donato has in his.
I can see an argument where some might prefer Donato to Bertuzzi but Bertuzzi has a much better track record of scoring. Teravainen I don't think is comparable to either. He's clearly more talented. A legitimate PP weapon and he's not a slouch defensively.