2025-26 NHL salary cap. Estimated $92.5m, but could be $95-97m?

eojsmada

Registered User
Oct 23, 2022
933
1,120
I'll be curious to see what they come up with. I'm sure having Utah and not Arizona is a huge boon to the bottom line of the league.
 

gstommylee

Registered User
Jan 31, 2012
14,799
2,993
What? They can go over 5% if they negotiate….

And the CBA doesn't expire until after 25-26 season... Unless the new CBA gets done by the end of this season. I don't see why the owners would give NHLPA leverage to demand a EVEN HIGHER cap just after one happened prior to the new CBA agreement going into effect.
 

StreetHawk

Registered User
Sep 30, 2017
29,063
11,257
I don't think the PA would risk going to the high end of $97 mill.
Based on last year's numbers, I believe escrow was at 6% and the PA ended up with about half of that back, thus a net of about 3% for escrow. That's kind of the range the PA prefers it being.

So, they'd sacrifice a couple of million of the cap to keep the net escrow in this 3% range, vs risk having it go up to 5-6% net after the numbers are all in.

Could see them push it up to $93-$94 mill if the escrow numbers are projected to remain close to the prior season.
 

rojac

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Apr 5, 2007
13,308
3,144
Waterloo, ON
I don't think the PA would risk going to the high end of $97 mill.
Based on last year's numbers, I believe escrow was at 6% and the PA ended up with about half of that back, thus a net of about 3% for escrow. That's kind of the range the PA prefers it being.

So, they'd sacrifice a couple of million of the cap to keep the net escrow in this 3% range, vs risk having it go up to 5-6% net after the numbers are all in.

Could see them push it up to $93-$94 mill if the escrow numbers are projected to remain close to the prior season.
Based on Friedman's report, the PA has been floating the 95-97M cap to players as they talk to them in preparation for upcoming CBA talks. So, I think the PA wants it. And I think they wanted a bigger increase last yeat but they couldn't reach a deal with the owners. Paul Bissonnette was wondering if the league might want a 84 game shedule (with reduced preseason games in exchange.
 

Tawnos

A guy with a bass
Sep 10, 2004
29,335
11,128
Charlotte, NC
And the CBA doesn't expire until after 25-26 season... Unless the new CBA gets done by the end of this season. I don't see why the owners would give NHLPA leverage to demand a EVEN HIGHER cap just after one happened prior to the new CBA agreement going into effect.

The current CBA explicitly allows them to exceed the 5% if both sides agree to it. This situation was anticipated. And I wouldn’t be surprised if the owners don’t really care much where the cap actually is, since they’re getting the same cut in the end anyway.
 

rojac

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Apr 5, 2007
13,308
3,144
Waterloo, ON
The current CBA explicitly allows them to exceed the 5% if both sides agree to it. This situation was anticipated. And I wouldn’t be surprised if the owners don’t really care much where the cap actually is, since they’re getting the same cut in the end anyway.
No but the players do seem to want, so from owners' point of view, it's a chance to get something from the players.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

  • HV 71 @ Lulea Hockey
    HV 71 @ Lulea Hockey
    Wagers: 2
    Staked: $85.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:
  • Croatia vs Portugal
    Croatia vs Portugal
    Wagers: 1
    Staked: $25.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:
  • Luxembourg vs Northern Ireland
    Luxembourg vs Northern Ireland
    Wagers: 2
    Staked: $50,050.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:
  • Poland vs Scotland
    Poland vs Scotland
    Wagers: 1
    Staked: $25.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:
  • Serbia vs Denmark
    Serbia vs Denmark
    Wagers: 1
    Staked: $25.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:

Ad

Ad