You seem to contradict yourself in the same paragraph. You say quit pointing out the youth D are weak (3rd pairing), but then cite they're still young and will be great once they mature as well as grow into roles they can handle. Yet, you left out another youth that took his game to another level last year in the same "crap man-to-man chase system" as a part of the Ducks top pairing set. LaCombe set a standard and you're offended that we appropriated identify the rest of our youths are 3rd pairing guys right now?
What's even more egregious with your cringy white knighting is that if we're to be a playoff team next year and no additional changes occur on the blue line, then the determinant will be Zell and Minty. If they don't improve their status from 3rd pairing players, then we might be stuck in neutral. We want them to improve, but neither one showed great improvement to end the season. Last season, I was able to identify that LaCombe did improve his play to where he was our best two-way player. LaCombe breaking out this season didn't happen out of nowhere.
View attachment 1036890
Although, I am hoping Zell or Minty can break through out of nowhere for this coming season... just not too confident in it occurring this coming season. If Samueli didn't put the ultimatum that we'd be a playoff team next year, then I wouldn't focus much on Zell and Minty continuing to develop their skill this season. I think next season is where they start putting things together like LaCombe's rookie season and 2026-27 is when they both can take a huge leap in development. In my eyes, we're still in year 4 of the reset rebuild and it's another development season. That ultimatum says we're done developing even though we're still in a premature stage with most of our youths.