Fwiw I mainly watched some of the quarters and all of the semis and finals and on:
Moore I actually thought probably showed the best, despite limited minutes. His tools project very well to the next level and he knows how to use his speed, was quite disruptive. Felt like he made an impact every shift. Good off puck game, knows how to get open. With the puck is a bit more questionable but I expect it to get better as he gains experience. Could be a great third wheel in the top 6 one day (Zach Hyman). Something I found interesting was that his shifts seemed REALLY short, maybe he needs to work on conditioning long term to be able to play at that pace consistently. Should have a bigger role next year as well. Overall I came away higher on Moore than I expected to be. Obviously there's a massive skill gap here but he almost reminds of Mackinnon the way his speed, agility and intensity pops off the screen at you and seems to gallop on the ice.
Man, I know people won't agree here but I’m not convinced that Nazar's healthy. I was a huge fan of this pick at the time and so so excited to watch after his summer camp but I'm also honest based on my viewings. He lacked a jump to his step like you saw with a guy like Brindley on his line and I know that Nazar can move at that pace based off his summer performance. I've seen the 4 primary assists, but man they were against the Swiss who don't think I even recognize a single player off the roster. Very few controlled zone entries, turnover prone when challenged and pretty much created nothing unless time and space was given to him. Rather telling about his game was that despite being tied for the team lead in points after the round robin he still didn't get any PP time as an older 19 year old. Sort of like how even when Gauthier lead the tournament in scoring he still seems rather unimpressive, Nazar was similar to me with his 8 assists. I'd challenge you to go find a good scoring chance that he had in the 2 medal round games against good opposition. Might've had 1, I just remember a late snapper today with the game out of reach. He was leaned on in defensive roles which projects well for an NHL future for him, but even there his decision making was suspect (weird icing with 10 secs left in the semis, forcing a late period o zone cross seam pass on a PK to nobody today and Sweden came back and scored). Players aren't themselves when injured and are prone to making worse decisions (Kaner with his hip) so if he is injured hopefully things get back in order. Side note, the way Seamus Casey moves and handles the puck is very reminiscent to summer camp Nazar, when he had what, 4 goals in 3 games?
Rinzel was up and down, with the down's being pretty damn low. Upside is obviously there with size and skating and being a right shot and he has a nice knack for controlled exits. I just don't see any sort of exceptional skillset to carry him developmentally. Del Mastro was a bit ahead in this tournament last year at the same point of their development though, IMO. He's still a project but I think a top pair RHD to compliment KK is a pipe dream, could very well carve out a Brendan Dillion type of career which I think is still a win where he was picked.
Hayes is tall, I guess? If he makes the show it'll be in a depth role.
The BC line was all phenomenal, Ryan Leonard seems like a future Conn Smythe winner. Hutson was pretty bad, worse than I had originally realized, skating in circles around the ozone with a mohawk stride isn't enough at the NHL level. Gauthier was meh as well, despite all the accolades. I want Buium as a Blackhawk, he's better than Korchinski.
Overall, 1 goal from all of our prospects combined is quite disappointing no matter how you draw it up. We don't have a sure fire core top 6 forward prospect as of right now, in my opinion. Moore will probably be complimentary, albeit an effective one. Nazar could get there, but the path is definitely more convulted than I had hoped.