As someone who loves the draft more than most, I will be super content if we have a boring draft because we gave up assets to get MG.
I wouldn’t be and I’m not advocating a return to the Snyder days of signing Prime, Fat Albert, Archuletta, Landon Collins, etc just because they’re the big names available that year and we want to sell jerseys. Trading for a monster edge rusher fills the team’s biggest need and will improve other players on the defense. The defense is instantly transformed with Garrett. Garrett is the kind of guy you accelerate timelines and sacrifice premium assets for.
Think about it this way — if we trade for Garrett, we arguably have the best offensive and defensive player in the Conference. Jayden might already be the best offensive player in the NFC and MG would be the best defensive player. You win games with elite, game-breaking talent at the most important positions and we’d have two of the best at the two most important spots on the field. It’s a no brainer.
I understand all this, but Garrett, at 29 (will be 30 before the next playoffs begin) has put up these enormous numbers already, and its not guaranteed he will continue this pace as he enters his 30s. We might just be trading for past performance instead of future results. I might be more excited about trying to land Micah Parsons over here in free agency.
In the end, if AP decides to trade for MG or Hendrickson, I'll be fine with it. I just think we're in a longer game than "win now" mode, selling the future for instant returns.