With the end of the tourney for team Latvia, wanted to share my insights on the key players:
- I liked the top line, and I stand by my point that Dzierkals was a good fit there. He was a good motor / disruption player, who stole pucks, forechecked and entered zones with speed. Too bad that when Daugavins and Abols, being the high IQ players they are, found him with passes, he only could hit goalie in the belly. Since we dont have enough scoring forwards to fill the top 6, putting Dzierkals to open ice for Abols and Daugavins was a good idea. Once Dzierkals was out, this line struggled.
- The only alternative to Dzierkals on the top line was Tralmaks, who was critically misused. And once he got out of the fourth line, the only idea the coaches came up for him was putting him in front of the goalie. Despite him scoring like 20 goals with one timers over the season. Great idea, Vitolins.
- Indrasis and Ri. Bukarts decided to take a year off. They are both well known to be rather lazy and invisible at times. Too bad that with all the talent, none of them showed up. Could really use some offence.
- Batna doing Batna things, but without the scoring he is just a fourth line shutdown center, who is lucky to be just one of two centers on this roster who are actually capable of something.
- NCAA guys all did good, but Locmelis was a slight disappointment after his performance last year. Thanks for the second point against Slovakia, but during the games he was just meh, which reflects his overall season. Hope they dont Girgenson him there in the US and he bounces back offensively next year.
- Before the tournament, I was concerned by the lack of puck movers and shooters among defensemen. It turned out, the main problem with our defense is, well, defense. I swear like, two thirds of goals against were scored when the opponent was just left completely alone in the middle of our zone. Every single defenseman was a liability on defense and every single defenseman apart from Jaks contributed nothing on the offense.
- Goalies are what they are. They are not to blame for most of the goals due to defensive collapses but from a EU league MVP and an NHL starter you would expect that they make some saves they werent supposed to. They just stopped what they were supposed to stop and let in what they were expected to let in. No more, no less. The only thing I would have done differently is put Merzlikins against the US. Gudlevskis looked like he needed to go to rehab until the next season. Probably wouldnt have changed a lot, though. Congrats to Vitols on a solid debut.
- Vitolins was Vitolins. I never particularly liked him, but it is clear that after last year, his credit is almost unlimited, and there are very few alternatives. He did misuse some players, his bias towards certain players and leagues is well known, as well as his conservatism. The biggest mistake was letting Abols go prior to the tournament. He is a capable coach who knows Latvian hockey and players and is a good motivator, something Vitolins clearly lacks. Afterwards, nothing Vitolins did was particularly bad or unexpected of him.