2024 Team Board Mock Draft
- Thread starter Hasbro
- Start date
Gnashville
HFBoards Hall of Famer
Blackhawkswincup
RIP Fugu
Hawks have been stocking cupboards for several drafts now on blueline and its starting to bear fruit
2019
Alex Vlasic (2nd round)
2020
Wyatt Kaiser (3rd round)
Michael Krutil (4th round) -- Will become FA as Hawks are not offering him contract this summer
Isaak Phillips (5th round)
Louis Crevier (7th round)
2021
Nolan Allan (1st round)
Taige Harding (3rd round)
Ethan Del Mastro (4th round)
Connor Kelley (7th round) -- Hawks have to decide if they want to offer him contract this summer
2022
Kevin Korchinski (1st round)
Sam Rinzel (1st round)
2023
Janne Peltonen (7th round)
Vlasic has established himself as top 4 NHL defender, Korchinski finished his rookie year in NHL while Kaiser, Phillips, Crevier and now Del Mastro have all gotten feet wet in NHL
Hawks have to decide if Levshunov adds something our D pool is missing which is top pairing potential RD. Rinzel development since his draft looks promising but one can never have enough RD prospects especially potentially a blue chip prospect
You'd think a fanbase that freaked out when they selected Carey Price over Gilbert Brule (infamously much to the chagrin of Pierre McGuire), despite having two good young goalies at the time in Jose Theodore and Mathieu Garon, would understand by now that passing up the BPA to draft for need/fit is a bad idea.
Not to mention the colossal mistake that was reaching for Kotkaniemi over Tkachuk because they needed a center.
Starting was probably the wrong word but I meant defensemen that have 1st and 2nd pairing upside. Korchinski and Rinzel are good prospects and are definitely in that category. I was a fan of Del Mastro in his draft so I know he'll be great whatever he turns out to be. The Blackhawks definitely more high end defense prospects but not to the degree my post stated.
I guess my original theory of them leaning towards a forward in this draft might be correct.
Normally I find I'm pretty in sync with your prospect thoughts but we differ greatly on Silayev. I'd be willing to bet a lot of money I don't have that the Ducks take him at 3OA. He's the perfect fit to complement the many offensive D they have who can't play defense and aren't physical. He's Pat Verbeek wet dream.
I think Carter Yakemchuk is going to be Pat Verbeek's wet dream, just not sure I'd take him at #3. I would however take him ahead of Silayev every time.
The Ducks need to shell out for Dillon DeMelo. Not every problem should be solved through the draft.
Yakemchuk at 3OA would be a major gaffe. 13OA? sure thing. The Silayev detractors seem to believe that what he is today is all he'll ever be. The guy was 17 and played the entire year against grown men. Even Victor Hedman only had 4 points in 39 games as a 17 year-old rookie in the SHL.
Beyond Celebrini, this is a draft full of flawed players. Assuming Demidov goes 2OA, I'll take Silayev all day over all the others. There will be players that score more points but I don't believe there will be many players in this draft that will be able to impact a game (especially playoffs) like Silayev will be able to do...even with minimal growth in his game he will still be a 3/4 monster in the D zone. That's valuable.
Dillon DeMelo would be great...but he has to want to come to California. Barring overpayments, most UFA's want nothing to do with the state for a lot of good reasons.
- Hedman was a proven scorer in Swedish junior before moving up to the SHL. Silayev has never been an offensive player.
- You're comparing Hedman's D-1 to Silayev's draft year, I suppose that's fine but I'm taking note of the 8 month age difference. When Hedman was as old as Silayev is now, he was in the SHL scoring a lot.
- Silayev actually played the MHL playoffs this year. I watched it. He was okay. Didn't try a single thing offensively. I can understand a player being extra cautious in the KHL. And I can understand a player trying things and experimenting, but not being able to score yet. But in the MHL, and not even trying to do anything suggests to me that this is a player who doesn't have the wiring for offense. That and his handling and small area skills are very limited so it really isn't easy for him to score.
rt
Clean Hits on Substack
Not going to contradict anything you said but it amazes me that CSB and McKenzie's scouts (among others) could be watching the same player! One side is going to be very wrong...
rt
Clean Hits on Substack
It’s just the degree to which you have to project development into these players. And I’d say any criticism I have of Silayev comes with a disclaimer: “for a top ten pick”. I’ve got him comfortably in my top ten. I think he’s an A+ prospect. There are elements of his game that I’m not seeing enough of right now and I have to use my crystal ball too much on. Real scouts are better at that and are apparently willing to bet on their abilities. Which is why he’s so highly rated within the top ten.
Regarding Bob’s list, it came out a week ago. I have to imagine he asked for lists a week or two or three weeks before that? And the lists he received may have been a week or two or three old? At least some of them. So I’m not totally confident that every scout McKenzie surveyed turned in a list the reflected the 2nd or 3rd rounds of the CHL playoffs or the Frozen Four, or the U18s. That would obviously have a huge influence on the results. I may be wrong. We’ll find out when the final poll gets released.
Yes, I'm looking forward (as usual) to McKenzie's final list. For the Ducks specifically I think that Silayev will be a very enticing option. All their top D prospects (Mintyukov, Luneau, Zell, and LaCombe) are offensive in nature with only average defensive abilities. Adding Levshunov just adds to that mix and how many offensive defensemen does a team need? Silayev can play the right side and slot in next to Mintyukov or Zellweger and be very effective IMO...similar to the Simashev pick last year.
Anyway, I appreciate the discussion...I'm hoping that the Ducks walk away with either Demidov or Silayev at 3OA. That said, they like to pull surprises at the draft table so who knows!
So far for the Devils
23 votes Nygard
8 votes Helenius
6 votes Eiserman
Would be happy with Nygard or Helenius but Eiserman would be my nightmare scenario.
23 votes Nygard
8 votes Helenius
6 votes Eiserman
Would be happy with Nygard or Helenius but Eiserman would be my nightmare scenario.
Aaaarrgghh
Registered User
- Jul 17, 2022
- 631
- 667
Given that New Jersey has an abundance of good and fantastic young players, I could see them take a chance on Eiserman's upside.
I would take Eiserman but consider trading down in this spot to fill the pool up more
Forge
Blissfully Mediocre
I've mentioned it before, but out of the guys who will realistically be available at 10, eiserman is probably the guy I'd have as the least likely. Think there's going to be some PTSD from holtz and I think they will want guys with a more well rounded game
Aaaarrgghh
Registered User
- Jul 17, 2022
- 631
- 667
I'll take your word for it. New Jersey and Buffalo are examples of teams that afford a riskier pick with higher upside though (assuming that both teams keep them).
