2024 Sportico NHL franchise valuations

LadyStanley

Registered User
Sep 22, 2004
111,807
24,227
Sin City


Toronto top at $3.66b. Columbus bottom at $1.06b.

To derive the fair market value of the 32 NHL franchises, Sportico calculated each team’s revenue, relying on publicly available information and financial records—as well as interviews with those knowledgeable of team finances, including eight sports bankers and lawyers who actively work on NHL transactions. In the interest of accuracy, we traded candor for anonymity. This information was vetted with multiple team owners, team financial and operating officers, media relations personnel and former team executives, as well as industry experts and sports-focused economists.
 

No Fun Shogun

34-38-61-10-13-15
May 1, 2011
57,634
15,518
Illinois
Always have to take these valuations with a few million grains of sand, but pumping the tires of franchise values this past decade is a big reason why Bettman is untouchable.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TheLegend

S E P H

Cloud IX
Mar 5, 2010
32,748
18,197
Toruń, PL
I still think most of the top 10 teams are at least half of the value they would truly go for IMHO. If Toronto is sold, I would reckon it would go for 6-7 billion.
 

Bixby Snyder

IBTFAD
May 11, 2005
3,630
1,779
Albuquerque
www.comc.com
Second least profitable =/= Not profitable
Would you be saying that if it was a sunbelt team at #31? A while back I said that every team was profitable or at least in a position to be profitable and all I got was ROFL emojis, good to see you've come over my side on this issue. :cool:

BTW I did not make the claim the Jets weren't profitable just pointed out what was clearly factual. Also Winnipeg along with Ottawa, 2 teams in the country that eats, breaths, sleeps, jerks it to hockey is behind every single sunbelt franchise, do with that what you will.
 
Last edited:

blueandgoldguy

Registered User
Oct 8, 2010
5,457
2,793
Greg's River Heights
Would you be saying that if it was a sunbelt team at #31? A while back I said that every team was profitable or at least in a position to be profitable and all I got was ROFL emojis, good to see you've come over my side on this issue. :cool:

BTW I did not make the claim the Jets weren't profitable just pointed out what was clearly factual. Also Winnipeg along with Ottawa, 2 teams in the country that eats, breaths, sleeps, jerks it to hockey is behind every single sunbelt franchise, do with that what you will.
The value of teams isn't based on profit alone. It's also based on market size among other factors. Hope that helps.!
 

blueandgoldguy

Registered User
Oct 8, 2010
5,457
2,793
Greg's River Heights

MLB isn't in an envious spot. We have the fallout of recent regional TV deals, most of the outside interest in the sport exists in poor third world countries which lessens potential out-of-country revenue sources, and the 2 first world countries (Japan and South Korea) where interest in the sport is high are demographic time bombs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kirk Van Houten

Takuto Maruki

Ideal and the real
Dec 13, 2016
447
328
Brandon, Manitoba
MLB isn't in an envious spot. We have the fallout of recent regional TV deals, most of the outside interest in the sport exists in poor third world countries which lessens potential out-of-country revenue sources, and the 2 first world countries (Japan and South Korea) where interest in the sport is high are demographic time bombs.
lol at that last line. What realistically is going to replace baseball in South Korea or Japan as the top sport, even with demographics shifting rapidly? Soccer in SK is a joke that will continue being a joke as long as the chaebol infested factions of the KFA hold the cards, and will play second fiddle to J.League as a feeder system for the second class of European clubs...and J.League isn't ever going to rise above that moniker of being a cheap feeder system as long as they hold the position of the best soccer league in Asia.

The fact of the matter is that in SK and Japan, baseball is king, and probably always will be.
 

blueandgoldguy

Registered User
Oct 8, 2010
5,457
2,793
Greg's River Heights
lol at that last line. What realistically is going to replace baseball in South Korea or Japan as the top sport, even with demographics shifting rapidly? Soccer in SK is a joke that will continue being a joke as long as the chaebol infested factions of the KFA hold the cards, and will play second fiddle to J.League as a feeder system for the second class of European clubs...and J.League isn't ever going to rise above that moniker of being a cheap feeder system as long as they hold the position of the best soccer league in Asia.

The fact of the matter is that in SK and Japan, baseball is king, and probably always will be.
lol at yourself. I never said baseball will be replaced in those countries. Fewer people in the future means fewer people watching baseball, meaning less opportunities for international revenue (merch, international sponsorships, international tv deals, overseas games). South Korea has a birthrate of 0.63. The population of the country will likely decline by 50% within 4 decades unless there are substantial changes to the immigration policies and workplace culture.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad