BigBadBruins7708
Registered User
they were 3rd in the AL in runs scored.
the sabermetrics version of "more days in 1st place"
they were 3rd in the AL in runs scored.
If I thought like the A's -- I'd be homeless, penniless and a laughingstock.He’s on the A’s what do you think
I think the problem is ownership will use whatever angle they need to explain not spending.I think he's saying if they have a bunch of good, cost-controlled players on the roster that's more of a reason for them to go nuts spending, not an excuse to be cheap. I think everyone here actually agrees!
well you got one coveredIf I thought like the A's -- I'd be homeless, penniless and a laughingstock.
well you got one covered
(Kidding to good to pass up)
I think the problem is ownership will use whatever angle they need to explain not spending.
"We're waiting on our good young players to blossom first"
"Oh our good young players are blossoming and we're winning so why spend? We need that money for them down the line anyway"
Rinse and repeat
The reality is though not all the young guys we are talking about are going to blossom. It doesn't work that way. Some won't make it. Which is why you need to supplement with proven talent. Waiting and waiting and waiting has NOT worked and it's not the answer.
For me, its not so much that the Yankees lost, its HOW they lost. I just pulled the series stats from Baseball Reference: 2024 World Series - Los Angeles Dodgers over New York Yankees (4-1) | Baseball-Reference.comI am so glad the Yankees lost. Like Montreal losing it never gets old.
I would actually be OK with giving Corbin Burnes or Max Fried the kind of deal that Aaron Nola (7 yrs, $172m) or Carlos Rodon (6 yrs, $162m) got. Maybe even slightly more. They're both close to 30 and fairly durable. I would also be OK with giving Blake Snell a shorter term deal, even if the AAV were slightly higher. I would not be OK with giving any of them a Gerrit Cole (9 yrs, $325m) deal.I really don't want to go at you but yay for being 3rd in runs scored. Then fine, there are still no starting pitching prospects that are close. So go out and spend on the best starting pitcher out there. And I am almost certain you will say they should not do that because it will be a bad contract. I am done with "hope" that next year will be the year the young prospects carry the Boston Red Sox. Act like a big market team. Act with some urgency and stop screwing your fans every chance you get.
The Boston Red Sox should not be excited about the number of cost controlled position players. Nobody is forcing them to do that. Sign Juan Soto and maybe you are 1st in runs scored and an actual contender. But we can't do that because it will be a bad contract. We can only give out medium length bad contracts like Trevor Story and Yoshida.
The team stinks. It has stunk for too long.
You don't exactly need a degree in advanced statistical analysis to figure out that finishing 3rd in the American League in runs scored is pretty good.the sabermetrics version of "more days in 1st place"
The Yanks have to feel devastated. Probably their best shot at a title for a long time (Soto may leave, little payroll flexibility). Easy road (KC and CLE) and then faced an injury-plagued Dodgers. Could and should have won games 1 and 5.
On the other hand, Dave Roberts has got to be the biggest winner after this WS. Always criticized as Dodgers-manager, not getting credit for 20, but now winning a legit title with a Dodgers-team missing more than half their rotation.
So? 190 is middle of the pack in todays game.
Of course you can be successful with a lesser or average payroll, but you have a much higher shot if you are in the top 5 perennially. And all things considered, the Red Sox have no reason not to be right behind the Yankees, Dodgers and Mets. Especially after what has transpired over the past years finishing in the basement. 2018 was already 6 years ago.
And judging from recent past and seeing how many prospects they have, it's much more likely that they are using that currency (prospects) instead of real money. Meaning Crochet rather than Burnes / Fried.
Thank god they low-balled Teoscar.
It's a repeat of the same thing every year, same warnings not to spend, same mediocre team. Next comes the highlights of some single A player hitting a HR and the future is brightI think the problem is ownership will use whatever angle they need to explain not spending.
"We're waiting on our good young players to blossom first"
"Oh our good young players are blossoming and we're winning so why spend? We need that money for them down the line anyway"
Rinse and repeat
The reality is though not all the young guys we are talking about are going to blossom. It doesn't work that way. Some won't make it. Which is why you need to supplement with proven talent. Waiting and waiting and waiting has NOT worked and it's not the answer.
I feel like Yoshida was signed just so they could get a Japanese pipeline going and attract Yamamoto and Ohtani the next year, but Henry changed gears and fired Bloom and then didn't give Breslow enough budget to be serious on Yamamoto (and they had no shot at Ohtani whatsoever). Then they're left with a guy who hits well but not for power and can't play defense.
It kind of reminds me of the first time the Celtics signed Al Horford. The idea was to build a big three with Durant, then Durant screwed over Ainge and went to Golden State and he was left with Horford who was good but kind of lost in the fold without support.
You get those numbers at maybe 2 mill a yearRed Sox currently 17th in money committed to 2025. That's just crazy to me. No more waiting for the kids. Sign proven talent and take some of the pressure off these kids when they're ready. Act now.
Old pal Chaim Bloom left us with two turd contracts in Story and Yoshida. Breslow should try to dump one or both if at all possible. Be creative. Banking on Story being healthy is laughable at this point. Yoshida at 18m a year is disgraceful.
how about having some balls and offering Soto $500m? for $100m you get an average pitcher and slightly above average position player.A little context on the $100 million comment from Alex Speier.
He's not wrong.