Habs
It's going to be a long year
- Feb 28, 2002
- 22,801
- 17,591
in a recent Chelios interview, he really likes Cayden Lindstrom at 2 over the Russian.
It will be impossible not to see one of Demidov/Lindstrom/Iginla available at #5 OA with Celebrini the #1 OA pick.Not mocks, Twitter pundits and Hab fans.
We’re in a good place this draft compared to last year where Hughes was unable to land a top 4 pick. We’ll likely come out with one of Demidov/ Lindstrom/ Iginla this time around.
Well, if Chelios said as much...in a recent Chelios interview, he really likes Cayden Lindstrom at 2 over the Russian.
Listening to Processus, the weekly podcast on prospects involving Snake Boisvert and Matthias Brunet, his knock against Helenius is how he shows up one game and disappears the next. I don’t know if the criticism is warranted, maybe someone who has watched him closely can confirm.Helenius, at 5'11", 181lbs, plays with an edge and initiates contact in pay zones. He's a gamer. Don't let numbers on paper fool you.
No, I’m positive I’m not missing the point. I like Nick but to assume that every skilled sub 6 foot forward will be as successful as him in the NHL is foolish. The odds of a bigger player being an effective playoff performer are higher than a Nick body clone being an effective top 6 forward in the playoffs. And all things being equal, I’ll go with the bigger player usually.I think you might be missing the point. Suzuki is 5'11 212 and has already had playoff success, leading a team in scoring that made it to the Finals at 21 years old and tying for the lead in scoring on a team that made the 2nd round at 20 years old.
It seems to be a little nonsensical to put someone with his physical stature and playoff history in a category of "you don't win in the playoffs with too many guys like that" because he's an inch shorter (or half an inch shorter with rounding) than an arbitrary cutoff point.
It will be impossible not to see one of Demidov/Lindstrom/Iginla available at #5 OA with Celebrini the #1 OA pick.
There just needs ONE D to go as the #2, #3, or #4 OA pick. The quality of Ds at this year's draft practically ensures that.
Well, if Chelios said as much...
Demidov just not Chelios' big boy type of player.
I think Lidstrom makes more sense there if they went with a forward. They need some protection for Bedard.I just found it interesting, I think Chelios likes a certain type of player to go along with Bedard, a bigger guy. It makes sense
I think Lidstrom makes more sense there if they went with a forward. They need some protection for Bedard.
But I’d go D if I were Chicago.
Listening to Processus, the weekly podcast on prospects involving Snake Boisvert and Matthias Brunet, his knock against Helenius is how he shows up one game and disappears the next. I don’t know if the criticism is warranted, maybe someone who has watched him closely can confirm.
Anyone watching the intensity of battle that is the Boston/Florida series wants a larger, heavier player.I just found it interesting, I think Chelios likes a certain type of player to go along with Bedard, a bigger guy. It makes sense
Chicago has the 20 oa too, they can get both a top D at #2 and a 6' plus size winger in the 15-20 range (one of MBN, Hemming, Hage, etc).honestly I probably would as well, the D is pretty sus. Goals are nice, but losing 6-5 all the time isn't going to last long in Chicago. But Chelios is probably thinking of covering Bedard with some size/skill
Noise from where/who?There’s certainly more and more noise that Demidov + Bedard is a team construction problem. Curious to see what Chicago ends up doing. If they see this as an issue the answer imho is to draft Levshunov not drafting Lindstrom.
No, I’m positive I’m not missing the point. I like Nick but to assume that every skilled sub 6 foot forward will be as successful as him in the NHL is foolish. The odds of a bigger player being an effective playoff performer are higher than a Nick body clone being an effective top 6 forward in the playoffs. And all things being equal, I’ll go with the bigger player usually.
it always comes down to having that size/grit to get you through these series, never changes. Our team in 93 had a wicked mix of size, grit, toughness, skill.. could play any way you wanted to. We abandoned that for 30 years, it showed.Anyone watching the intensity of battle that is the Boston/Florida series wants a larger player, heavier player.
We also had the good fortune of both having the Islanders upsetting the defending Cup Champions and prohibitive Cup favorite, Pittsburg Penguins and winning 10 overtime games in that unexpected playoff run.it always comes down to having that size/grit to get you through these series, never changes. Our team in 93 had a wicked mix of size, grit, toughness, skill.. could play any way you wanted to. We abandoned that for 30 years, it showed.
It was a run of destiny! Magical run to be honest. You hear the what ifs all the time but that doesn't matter. You play who you play just like the Habs run a couple years ago.We also had the good fortune of both having the Islanders upsetting the defending Cup Champions and prohibitive Cup favorite, Pittsburg Penguins and winning 10 overtime games in that unexpected playoff run.
Ok. You’re crazy. I’ll take Leonard and Leshunov / Yakemchuk seven days a week and twice on Sunday.Call me crazy but I'd rather have Reinbacher + Demidov//Lindstrom//Iginla than Michkov//Leonard + Leshunov//Parekh//Yakemchuk (the only RD's).
We also had the good fortune of both having the Islanders upsetting the defending Cup Champions and prohibitive Cup favorite, Pittsburg Penguins and winning 10 overtime games in that unexpected playoff run.
Catton>Iginla and Lindstrom. They want BPA and a forward so......
Scott Wheeler on Sennecke:
"Everyone saw the skill and the potential, but as one OHL coach told me, he had a lot of bad habits he needed to break, a tendency to play one-on-one too much, and wavering competitiveness. There were also benchings and off-ice questions."
"We’re just a month and a half out from that and there’s no way Sennecke is available outside the top 20 anymore. Some teams are having top-10 conversations about him.
A lot of that has just been about the consistency of his effort level, his competitiveness beginning to shine through, and the skill showing up more often because he’s more involved in games and make better choices in terms of play selection."
Sennecke and Yakemchuk are probably the only two players that I would aggressively move up for if they fall out of the top ten ( assuming they aren't our choice at 5OA). Both are the only two of the usual suspects in this draft who one could realistically see dropping out of the top ten. Lets see if Hughes shares my enthusiasm.There's still time for him to poop in a teammate's hockey bag and subsequently drop to our winnipeg pick
Yeah he is pretty strong all over the ice, plays with an edge and has the skating to go along.Helenius, at 5'11", 181lbs, plays with an edge and initiates contact in pay zones. He's a gamer. Don't let numbers on paper fool you.