Toggle sidebar

2024 NHL Draft Thread Part 2 - Picks 2 & 18 in the 1st Round

  • Work is still on-going to rebuild the site styling and features. Please report any issues you may experience so we can look into it. Click Here for Updates

Who do we take?

  • Total voters
    142
Status
Not open for further replies.
ndgt10 said:
9-12
www.nhlmockdraftdatabase.com

2023 NHL Trade Value Chart | NHL Mock Draft Database

The 2023 NHL trade value chart represents values for every pick in the NHL Draft. This model was developed by Jimmy Johnson during his time as head coach of the Dallas Cowboys.
www.nhlmockdraftdatabase.com www.nhlmockdraftdatabase.com
Click to expand...
If this was possible, I would do this without a doubt. I do wish this happened but really doubt it would. I'd even take 13-15th overall.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hawksrule and plank
u2wojo said:
Besides the handedness, for me Buium has a better chance to develop more defensive chops while Parekh has more of a danger of being just offense. I don't think either are ever a lock down shut it down guy in their own end, but I suspect Buium has a chance to be serviceable at least and fear Parekh may not.
Click to expand...
I don't disagree with that.

I think Parekh has a higher offensive ceiling than Buium though. Parekh is a better skater too.

Those factors give him an edge for me.

EddieTheEagle said:
If this was possible, I would do this without a doubt. I do wish this happened but really doubt it would. I'd even take 13-15th overall.
Click to expand...
Tack on that bum Lukas Reichel and we can easily move into that range
 
  • Like
Reactions: EddieTheEagle
Castle8130 said:
Like most drafts there's a sweet spot to draft players. It feels like there is a pretty steep drop-off from 17-25 range for me. Then there is a flat tier where you can put 30-40 names up from picks 25-65. Last year there was a significant dip from picks 9-22 and then it flattened heavily from pick 22-62 for me. I like the depth and the top 5 of last years draft a bit more, but players in the 9-22 range are of much higher quality this year. It feels like there is a lot more blue chip prospects with a lesser quality top 5 comparative to last year. A slightly above average class for me

[TABLE=collapse]
[TR]
[TD]1[/TD]
[TD]Macklin Celebrini[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]2[/TD]
[TD]Ivan Demidov[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]3[/TD]
[TD]Zeev Buium[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]4[/TD]
[TD]Cayden Lindstrom[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]5[/TD]
[TD]Artyom Levshunov[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]6[/TD]
[TD]Zayne Parekh[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]7[/TD]
[TD]Anton Silayev[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]8[/TD]
[TD]Tij Iginla[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]9[/TD]
[TD]Konsta Helenius[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]10[/TD]
[TD]Sam Dickinson[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]11[/TD]
[TD]Berkly Catton[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]12[/TD]
[TD]Carter Yakemchuk[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]13[/TD]
[TD]Beckett Sennecke[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]14[/TD]
[TD]Michael Brandsegg Nygard[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]15[/TD]
[TD]Michael Hage[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]16[/TD]
[TD]Yegor Surin[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]17[/TD]
[TD]Trevor Connelly[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]18[/TD]
[TD]Adam Jiricek[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]19[/TD]
[TD]Cole Eiserman[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]20[/TD]
[TD]Liam Greentree[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]21[/TD]
[TD]Igor Chernyshov[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]22[/TD]
[TD]Cole Hutson[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]23[/TD]
[TD]Andrew Basha[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]24[/TD]
[TD]Emil Hemming[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]25[/TD]
[TD]Dominik Badinka[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]26[/TD]
[TD]Nikita Artamonov[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]27[/TD]
[TD]Terik Paracsak[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]28[/TD]
[TD]Marek Vanacker[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]29[/TD]
[TD]Matvei Gridin[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]30[/TD]
[TD]EJ Emery[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]31[/TD]
[TD]Raoul Boilard[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]32[/TD]
[TD]Alfons Freij[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]33[/TD]
[TD]Sam O'Reilly[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]34[/TD]
[TD]Jesse Pulkinnen[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]35[/TD]
[TD]Sacha Boisvert[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]36[/TD]
[TD]Stian Solberg[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]37[/TD]
[TD]Jett Luchanko[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]38[/TD]
[TD]Adam Jecho[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]39[/TD]
[TD]Teddy Stiga[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]40[/TD]
[TD]Cole Beadoin[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
Click to expand...
Looking at the NHL CS final rankings, imagine if they got Demidov at 2, Hage at 20, Surin at 34, and Hutson in the late 2nd. Whew
 
  • Love
Reactions: Castle8130
I think Jett Luchanko could easily be the Hawks target at 20.....seems to fit the KD mode completely....of course, it depends on what happens and who's still on the table, but just sayin'
 
dreadpirateroberts said:
Looking at the NHL CS final rankings, imagine if they got Demidov at 2, Hage at 20, Surin at 34, and Hutson in the late 2nd. Whew
Click to expand...
The picks at #20 and #34 barring we don't move up are probably going to be structural picks. So I'm betting the Hawks are looking at bigger forwards and offensive minded defensemen. Usually in those ranges you are looking at a few guys that are all the same level of prospects. It's not like a top 10 pick where you pick BPA no matter what
 
Cant shake the gut feeling that the Hawks pick Lindstrom.

Not that I agree, but if he hits his "ceiling" he is exactly what our prospect pool is missing
 
  • Like
Reactions: crazyhawk
ndgt10 said:
9-12
www.nhlmockdraftdatabase.com

2023 NHL Trade Value Chart | NHL Mock Draft Database

The 2023 NHL trade value chart represents values for every pick in the NHL Draft. This model was developed by Jimmy Johnson during his time as head coach of the Dallas Cowboys.
www.nhlmockdraftdatabase.com www.nhlmockdraftdatabase.com
Click to expand...
I don't value 2nd round picks that much but doesn't this chart disprove its own estimations by saying the proper return value would be in the 9-12 range?

If we pick 10th in the draft next year and KD trades that for #20 + #34 I'd be pissed. The value of these draft picks going down very quickly outside of the top 15 or so. You're WAY more likely to get a good to great player in the 9-12 range than you'd be to get two good players at 20 and 34 no?
 
  • Like
Reactions: hawksrule and hockeydoug
x Tame Impala said:
I don't value 2nd round picks that much but doesn't this chart disprove its own estimations by saying the proper return value would be in the 9-12 range?

If we pick 10th in the draft next year and KD trades that for #20 + #34 I'd be pissed. The value of these draft picks going down very quickly outside of the top 15 or so. You're WAY more likely to get a good to great player in the 9-12 range than you'd be to get two good players at 20 and 34 no?
Click to expand...
20 -> 10 is only ten spots at the end of the day. A 2nd doesn't have to be that valued since you're not making up so many spots. It's not infeasible at all that 10th ends up nothing because 10th is already well within the "yeah they can definitely bust" range, and 20th ends up really good, or they both end up nothing and 34th ends up good.

It's really the extra bite of the apple with another pick, only 14 slots later. The actual picks matter less than expected value, but you can look through.

2008: Cody Hodgson vs. Michael Del Zotto and Jake Allen
2009: Magnus Paajarvi vs. Jacob Josefson and Carl Klingberg
2010: Dylan McIlrath vs. Beau Bennett and Dalton Smith
2011: Jonas Brodin vs. Connor Murphy and Scott Mayfield
2012: Slater Koekkeok vs. Scott Laughton and Ville Pokka
2013: Valeri Nichushkin vs. Anthony Mantha and Jacob De La Rose
2014: Nick Ritchie vs. Nick Schmaltz and Mason McDonald
2015: Mikko Rantanen vs. Joel Eriksson Ek and Travis Dermott
2016: Tyson Jost vs. Dennis Cholowski and Andrew Peeke
2017: Owen Tippett vs. Robert Thomas and Nicolas Hague
2018: Evan Bouchard vs. Rasmus Kupari and Serron Noel
2019: Vasili Podkolzin vs. Ville Heinola and Bobby Brink
2020: Cole Perfetti vs. Shakir Mukhamadullin and John Peterka
2021: Tyler Boucher vs. Jesper Wallstedt and Olen Zellwegger
2022: Pavel Mintyukov vs. Ivan Miroshnichenko and Cam Lund
2023: Dalibor Dvorsky vs. Eduard Sale and Gavin Brindley

Some years give a clear winner one way, some years give a clear winner the other way. Some years it's just crap all around. However, I can look at that and think "yeah it's probably a fairly even trade". I think people maybe are a bit caught off by a 10th overall pick busting or a 20th finding success as "big surprises" but you're already passed the so-called 'sure things' by that point anyways.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Callidusblackhawk, plank and Castle8130
x Tame Impala said:
I don't value 2nd round picks that much but doesn't this chart disprove its own estimations by saying the proper return value would be in the 9-12 range?

If we pick 10th in the draft next year and KD trades that for #20 + #34 I'd be pissed. The value of these draft picks going down very quickly outside of the top 15 or so. You're WAY more likely to get a good to great player in the 9-12 range than you'd be to get two good players at 20 and 34 no?
Click to expand...
Completely agree. Do not trade down unless it's one of those extra late firsts or 2nds.

It's extremely rare more than 5 players from 16 through the end of the 2nd are first line/pair/g core type picks. Many of those are only really good for 4-6 years as well. Hawks need a core, not a bunch of 2nd pair/mid 6 types.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hawksrule
giza said:
I think Jett Luchanko could easily be the Hawks target at 20.....seems to fit the KD mode completely....of course, it depends on what happens and who's still on the table, but just sayin'
Click to expand...
The speed is there for sure.

But he's a smaller player that defers that puck.

20 is a bit too high for me. But good value in the 2nd round.
 
Draft Demidov #2 and use some assets to move up with our second pick to get a Yakemchuk or Iginila, if they start falling. Praying this happens.
 
  • Like
Reactions: scorehawks
Hypothetically speaking say if Davidson can move up to the 13-16 range, would you guys draft Demidov then see if you can grab a Yakemchuk/Jiricek or draft Levshunov and see if you can grab Eiserman/Helenius?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mrfenn92
Pick 20 should be another forward.Solberg a really mean defenseman with our first second rounder would be a nice add.Nygaard and Solberg two Norwegians.Size and both good skaters.
 
Castle8130 said:
Like most drafts there's a sweet spot to draft players. It feels like there is a pretty steep drop-off from 17-25 range for me. Then there is a flat tier where you can put 30-40 names up from picks 25-65. Last year there was a significant dip from picks 9-22 and then it flattened heavily from pick 22-62 for me. I like the depth and the top 5 of last years draft a bit more, but players in the 9-22 range are of much higher quality this year. It feels like there is a lot more blue chip prospects with a lesser quality top 5 comparative to last year. A slightly above average class for me

[TABLE=collapse]
[TR]
[TD]1[/TD]
[TD]Macklin Celebrini[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]2[/TD]
[TD]Ivan Demidov[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]3[/TD]
[TD]Zeev Buium[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]4[/TD]
[TD]Cayden Lindstrom[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]5[/TD]
[TD]Artyom Levshunov[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]6[/TD]
[TD]Zayne Parekh[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]7[/TD]
[TD]Anton Silayev[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]8[/TD]
[TD]Tij Iginla[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]9[/TD]
[TD]Konsta Helenius[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]10[/TD]
[TD]Sam Dickinson[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]11[/TD]
[TD]Berkly Catton[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]12[/TD]
[TD]Carter Yakemchuk[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]13[/TD]
[TD]Beckett Sennecke[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]14[/TD]
[TD]Michael Brandsegg Nygard[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]15[/TD]
[TD]Michael Hage[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]16[/TD]
[TD]Yegor Surin[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]17[/TD]
[TD]Trevor Connelly[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]18[/TD]
[TD]Adam Jiricek[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]19[/TD]
[TD]Cole Eiserman[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]20[/TD]
[TD]Liam Greentree[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]21[/TD]
[TD]Igor Chernyshov[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]22[/TD]
[TD]Cole Hutson[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]23[/TD]
[TD]Andrew Basha[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]24[/TD]
[TD]Emil Hemming[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]25[/TD]
[TD]Dominik Badinka[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]26[/TD]
[TD]Nikita Artamonov[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]27[/TD]
[TD]Terik Paracsak[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]28[/TD]
[TD]Marek Vanacker[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]29[/TD]
[TD]Matvei Gridin[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]30[/TD]
[TD]EJ Emery[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]31[/TD]
[TD]Raoul Boilard[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]32[/TD]
[TD]Alfons Freij[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]33[/TD]
[TD]Sam O'Reilly[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]34[/TD]
[TD]Jesse Pulkinnen[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]35[/TD]
[TD]Sacha Boisvert[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]36[/TD]
[TD]Stian Solberg[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]37[/TD]
[TD]Jett Luchanko[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]38[/TD]
[TD]Adam Jecho[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]39[/TD]
[TD]Teddy Stiga[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]40[/TD]
[TD]Cole Beadoin[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
Click to expand...
Way too low on Dickinson.
 
Beckett Sennicke surely is a riser on many NHL teans boards ...Hawks should take hom at 20 if he lasts that long now..

The question therefore is should we tradevup a few spotsxto gwtvhom?

We can package a 2 picks for one deal involving our #20 and one of our 2nds.. but other teams with multiple picks could also do that to movevup.

So hard to know if KD can pull it off.
 
NJ does not have ax2nd roubd pick...

So IF Hawks decide to try to move up from#20 maybe NJ would move down from 10 to 20 + get #34 and our first 3rd rounder?

Or amotger team tgat might drop down for a good haul is Detroit at #15 ...In that case they only move down 5 spots...but would get #34 .. as the sweetener.

We have the draft capital to try to move up..

Anotger possible sweetener is to give up one of our plethora of LD ..eg .Nolan Allen and make a larger deal..

Kd has lots of strategies he could try to movevup.

If we dod move to #10we might consider Carter Yakemchuk instead of securing Sennicke ..
 
Cold Steel on Ice said:
Pick 20 should be another forward.Solberg a really mean defenseman with our first second rounder would be a nice add.Nygaard and Solberg two Norwegians.Size and both good skaters.
Click to expand...
Unless Jiricek falls to 20, I don’t think there is a RHD worth taking at that spot. You could take Emery but is he really a top 20 player? I don’t think so. It seems like an overreach
 
hawksfan50 said:
NJ does not have ax2nd roubd pick...

So IF Hawks decide to try to move up from#20 maybe NJ would move down from 10 to 20 + get #34 and our first 3rd rounder?

Or amotger team tgat might drop down for a good haul is Detroit at #15 ...In that case they only move down 5 spots...but would get #34 .. as the sweetener.

We have the draft capital to try to move up..

Anotger possible sweetener is to give up one of our plethora of LD ..eg .Nolan Allen and make a larger deal..

Kd has lots of strategies he could try to movevup.

If we dod move to #10we might consider Carter Yakemchuk instead of securing Sennicke ..
Click to expand...
If NJ moves off of 10, I doubt they would be looking for picks in return.
 
dreadpirateroberts said:
Unless Jiricek falls to 20, I don’t think there is a RHD worth taking at that spot. You could take Emery but is he really a top 20 player? I don’t think so. It seems like an overreach
Click to expand...
It’s an overreach I suppose but he fills a spot of need and if you like the prospect, you can’t count on him being around 14 picks later so you shouldn’t try and get fancy. The 20th pick doesn’t need to be a swing for the fences if you’ve already taken Bedard and Demidov the last couple years.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dreadpirateroberts
Cold Steel on Ice said:
Pick 20 should be another forward.Solberg a really mean defenseman with our first second rounder would be a nice add.Nygaard and Solberg two Norwegians.Size and both good skaters.
Click to expand...
Yes Agreed , hopefully both Norwegians are still on the board when we make our picks !! Skol
 
What do people think of Yakemchuk and is there a possibility he lasts to 20?
 
hawksrule said:
What do people think of Yakemchuk and is there a possibility he lasts to 20?
Click to expand...
Higher likelihood he goes top 10 than him making it to 20.

I could see a team like Ottawa taking him at 7.

We're going to see a run of D taken off the board.

Lev, Buium, Silayev, Parekh, Dickinson, Yakemchuk. They're all gonna fly off the board.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hawksrule
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Top Bottom