- Sep 9, 2009
- 26,087
- 6,111
It would be as dumb as some of the things Dorion did. Simply cannot happen.There is no chance they forfeit a 7th overall in the first of a 3 year window.
That’s unbelievably stupid.
It would be as dumb as some of the things Dorion did. Simply cannot happen.There is no chance they forfeit a 7th overall in the first of a 3 year window.
That’s unbelievably stupid.
x.com
x.com
Iginla would be great. So would Catton.
I wouldn't be looking his way at 7, wouldn't be a guy I'd personally consider.Draft best player available, not best name available.
Staois's nightmares should have nothing to do with it. Tij is obviously good and someone to consider, but he's not the same player as his father.
I wouldn't be looking his way at 7, wouldn't be a guy I'd personally consider.
Eye of the beholder and all, I'm sure he'd be a guy, or the guy for many
I wouldn't be looking his way at 7, wouldn't be a guy I'd personally consider.
The guys who would be available would be in a higher tier for me, I'd be fine if we choose Iginla, but there are 8ish guys who I'd have solidly ahead of him if I were running the draft.Why not Iginla? He's one of the youngest players in the draft and has put up really solid numbers.
It'd be funny to pick mini Iggy and to see CGY offer a solid package like the 9th overall, Vancouver's 1st, and maybe even Vegas's pick in 2026 lol for a chance to draft Iggy.Tij would be a fine pick at 7.
However if Calgary were to offer Vancouver's 1st or their 2nd to move up from 9 to pick him, I think I'd take it.
So much parity in the 6-12 range. Lots of prospects that are in the same tier where I have trouble placing one above another.
Just with the state of Russia not sure a team takes a top 5 pick for a dude to wait 3 years to see a dude skate on Canadian ice who may end up being blown up by a Ukrainian drone
I’ll say he falls maybe even to Ottawa.
Why not Iginla? He's one of the youngest players in the draft and has put up really solid numbers.
Those are just two factors among so, so many.
Does his production matter? Sure, but most guys in the top 12 have put up really good numbers. Yakemchuk scored 30 goals and isn't in Bob's top 10. Cole Eiserman broke the USNTDP goal scoring record and isn't in Bob's top 10.
Does relative age matter? Sure, it can definitely indicate more runway in some cases. But personally, I think people around here put too much of an emphasis on it because - like stats - it takes no effort to point to.
But with Iginla there doesn't seem to be any concerns about his game. I admit I say this not having watched any of these players but just reading off what others have said. But Eiserman seems to be a one dimensional player and Yakemchuk, like most defencemen, there are always questions at how well he'll defend at the next level. Yakemchuk is also a year older than Iginla.
As for age, I'd say you're correct there is more runway for a younger player but I'd also note the year they were born is important as well. I'd expect more production from a player born late in the year (Oct-Dec) because they should be a year ahead of the other draft eligibles.
My thoughts on Iginla, based upon secondhand info, is that he's a player who probably fits with the identity the team would like moving forward. To go along with his skill, he wins battles for pucks, he's strong, and he's a good two way player. Those aren't attributes I'm hearing a lot for the other potential picks for the Sens.
I only point to Yakemchuk and Eiserman to show that having good numbers isn't what's going to separate players at the top of this draft. I'm not saying I necessarily would have either above Iginla (I'd go Iginla over Eiserman, for example).
There are obviously going to be a lot of good things to point to with a prospect like Iginla. It's how he stacks up against the other really good prospects that matters.
He's actually a better prospect than his father going into his draft.Draft best player available, not best name available.
Staois's nightmares should have nothing to do with it. Tij is obviously good and someone to consider, but he's not the same player as his father.
I'm just trying to learn from @BondraTime about why Iginla wouldn't be on his list at #7 since he seems to have a more informed opinion about prospects than the vast majority on here.
There is absolutely no chance Buium drops that far. I guarantee it, he's going to be a top 6 pick. 50 points in 42 games as a freshman d. Didnt get scored on his last 8 games of the season which were all playoff and elmination games. He was better than Hutton at the WJC isnt tiny and is a year younger.Draft Ranking:
Celebrini C / Demidov RW
Lindstrom C/LW / Levshunov RD
Buium LD / Parekh RD
Dickinson LD / Silayev LD
Catton C/LW / Helenius C/RW
Yakemchuk RD /Eiserman LW
Iginila C/LW / Sennecke RW
Greentree RW / Brandsegg- Nygard RW
Mock Draft:
SJ - Celebrini C - should take the 1st OA player
Chi - Lindstrom C/LW - Chicago need a big centre or winger to play with Bedard
Ann - Demidov RW - next most skilled player in this draft
Colum - Eiserman LW - really good goal scorer
Mon - Catton C - very skilled C
Utah - Levshunov RD - falls to Utah formerly known as Phoenix
Ott - Parekh RD - highly skilled RD
Sea - Dickinson LD - big, good all around D
Cal - Iginla C/LW - not sure they can pass him up
NJ - Buium LD - highly skilled LD
Buff - Yakemchuk RD - big, physical point producer
Phi - Helenius C/RW - good all around forward
Minn - Sennecke RW - big, good scoring winger
SJ - Silayev LD - huge D with some skill
Det - Branndsegg- Nygard RW - good all around winger
STL - Greentree RW - big scoring winger