he’s also shown no significant improvement in his game in two calendar years. He’s a nearly identical player to the one he was at 16 years oldThere are always some concerns with one dimensional players but this dude scored the most goals ever for the USDP. Over Caufield, Kane, Matthews, Smith, etc...
You don't do that and not make an impact at the show when the rest of the top 5 you beat are NHL stars..kid has solid size still needs strength but skating isn't terrible. Just looked disinterested at times..well so did Hull.
Caufield isn’t only a shooter. He has a very good offensive package outside of his shotCole Caufield??
This is why I’m most disappointed with the 18th pick. Had Hage and Eiserman right there, but went with what I assume the scouts determined as a safer pick.My biggest criticism of the rebuild has been how risk averse they’ve been.
127 goals in 119 games lol...he’s also shown no significant improvement in his game in two calendar years. He’s a nearly identical player to the one he was at 16 years old
None of those guys are shooters only either
Great. That literally doesn’t address anything I said127 goals in 119 games lol...
I liked Vlasic if you remember.Predictable melt downs in this thread. Can I borrow your magic crystal balls, that show 3 years into the future? Lol.
Unless my memory is going, I recall a very similar reaction to the Vlasic pick. I trust the Hawks scouting more than the opinions of HF posters. And more than most other scouting teams in the NHL.
Carry on though. It's so amusing.
Vlasic was a second rounder. Did people really complain? I don’t remember the pick in the moment.Predictable melt downs in this thread. Can I borrow your magic crystal balls, that show 3 years into the future? Lol.
Unless my memory is going, I recall a very similar reaction to the Vlasic pick. I trust the Hawks scouting more than the opinions of HF posters. And more than most other scouting teams in the NHL.
Carry on though. It's so amusing.
My biggest criticism of the rebuild has been how risk averse they’ve been.
because its nonsense...he broke records, lets see what he does in college and then talk about failing to take the next stepGreat. That literally doesn’t address anything I said
This board was doing backflips after the first round a year ago and now apparently the rebuild is dead in the water and Davidson needs to be fired. It’s mind numbingPredictable melt downs in this thread. Can I borrow your magic crystal balls, that show 3 years into the future? Lol.
Unless my memory is going, I recall a very similar reaction to the Vlasic pick. I trust the Hawks scouting more than the opinions of HF posters. And more than most other scouting teams in the NHL.
Carry on though. It's so amusing.
making these safer picks for physically mature players in the first round at the beginning of our rebuild is such small d*** energy
is it risk adverse to trade a 2nd to move up 2 spots for a draft a month away to end up with a player you would've had at 20 anywayMy biggest criticism of the rebuild has been how risk averse they’ve been.
Eiserman also finished 2nd all time in points not just goals. Not sure what you watched but to claim he didn't improve is ridiculous. He isn't a grinder. Isn't a two way player. Most goal scorers aren't. They are polarizing. But when they hit they make every other gm who passed on them look like idiots.he’s also shown no significant improvement in his game in two calendar years. He’s a nearly identical player to the one he was at 16 years old
None of those guys are shooters only either
Like low 20s so not really far off tbhWhere was Boisvert even ranked? Too lazy to look it up.
fire every one of these f***s if eiserman and demidov pan out because that could've been their draft