Taze em
Registered User
- Apr 20, 2012
- 8,673
- 992
Sennecke is Seneca… like the philosopher?!
Zeev Buy ‘em
Locking it in for posterity tonight.
Levshunov Hage/Cherny/Jet
Dream: Levshunov and a Forward faller in the 10 range.
GDT: 2024 NHL Draft Talk - Picked 2nd, 18th, 27th, 67th, 72nd, 92nd, 138th, & 163rd Overall
- Thread starter No Fun Shogun
- Start date
-
HF Sportsbook has been reset for the new season - Click here to play.
- Status
Zeev Buy ‘em
Locking it in for posterity tonight.
Levshunov Hage/Cherny/Jet
Dream: Levshunov and a Forward faller in the 10 range.
deytookerjaabs
Johnny Paycheck's Tank Advisor
Blackhawkswincup
RIP Fugu
One of these 4 (If there is no major dropper in draft who falls to #18)
C Michael Hage
LW Igor Chernyshov
RW Michael Brandsegg-Nygard
RD Adam Jiricek
I was hopeful to find a way to trade back into 1st and grab another one of them at Kings/Leafs spots but that appears unlikely with Kings already trading down
DisgruntledHawkFan
Blackhawk Down
That's just a difference of opinion. I don't think you understand what gas lighting is.
TheFridge
Registered User
- Mar 20, 2022
- 1,669
- 1,779
Bro I quoted for you the original point you made that I contended. What are you even talking about?
How are any of them notably better than Luchanko? I actually think he and Hage are pretty similar players. Hage is probably a bit more naturally skilled but Luchanko is more consistent/competitive.
DisgruntledHawkFan
Blackhawk Down
Luchanko would be a very good pick at 18 imo. He gets compared a lot to Moore (a very good prospect by the way) but he is more cerebral and a much better playmaker.
DisgruntledHawkFan
Blackhawk Down
clydesdale line
Connor BeJesus
- Jan 10, 2012
- 25,426
- 24,100
Moore wishes he had MBN's grit.
Both the Norwegian players coming out (he and Solberg) have some loose screws in their heads.
LavalPhantom
Registered User
- Sep 12, 2014
- 486
- 550
Blackhawkswincup
RIP Fugu
Absurdity from Preds to then try and push "Well we couldn't find trade"
If I am Askarov I simply refuse to play at this point. Telling young goalie you're going to intentionally stall his career development as plan is BS
If they want Saros for long-term then move the kid
I’d be very happy with one of Luchanko, MBN, or Hage at 18.
Luchanko gets the Moore comparisons (which aren’t awful) but i think he’s quite a bit more cerebral and the playmaking is much more refined
MBN isn’t that great of a creator, but you’d be taking him to be a “dirty work” guy. Very good shot too. Pair him with Bedard or Nazar and I think you’re looking at a high end forechecker scoring 25 goals a year.
Hage just has the highest offensive upside in that range. Absolutely love him. I think he’d be in conversations to go quite a bit higher had he not lost nearly all of last year due to injury and then struggled out of the gate this year after losing his dad
Luchanko gets the Moore comparisons (which aren’t awful) but i think he’s quite a bit more cerebral and the playmaking is much more refined
MBN isn’t that great of a creator, but you’d be taking him to be a “dirty work” guy. Very good shot too. Pair him with Bedard or Nazar and I think you’re looking at a high end forechecker scoring 25 goals a year.
Hage just has the highest offensive upside in that range. Absolutely love him. I think he’d be in conversations to go quite a bit higher had he not lost nearly all of last year due to injury and then struggled out of the gate this year after losing his dad
Geoist
Registered User
- May 1, 2015
- 4,323
- 2,682
That he's not a serious #2? There were like 4 out of 18 from that list that had him at 2. The rest had him as low as #11. The list supports my point.
Everyone who talks about Lev at #2 makes arguments about Hawks needing an RD or that the Hawks scouts like him. They rarely actually argue he's the BPA. That was my point.
belfour30
Blackhawks Fangirl
- Dec 14, 2019
- 1,908
- 1,660
Again, I like Lev and think he has a chance to be a #1. I just don't think that it's the right move for this group.
They couldn't score last year. Where is the scoring coming from?
They couldn't score last year. Where is the scoring coming from?
TheFridge
Registered User
- Mar 20, 2022
- 1,669
- 1,779
Bob's List, Pronman, Central Scouting, Wheeler and Peters all have Levshunov as the top D in the draft. Your original post, which was this:
"People are only talking about Levshunov being the 2nd pick because he's an RD and rumors swirled about Hawks scouts loving him."
Was my contention. There is no shortage of outlets that have Levshunov as the best D in the draft and your argument that they're not going with BPA if they go Lev is stupid because the only list that matters is there own.
Make yourself into a gaslit victim by all means though, if it makes you feel better.
DisgruntledHawkFan
Blackhawk Down
If they take Demi it won't come from him next year. Who cares?
TheFridge
Registered User
- Mar 20, 2022
- 1,669
- 1,779
The question you should be asking is who's going to score for them in 2027. And that's going to be answered over the next couple years and drafts.
DisgruntledHawkFan
Blackhawk Down
Nobody knows who the BPA is...example...Kucherov...later 2nd rounder....you never know for sure.
belfour30
Blackhawks Fangirl
- Dec 14, 2019
- 1,908
- 1,660
I don't think that they will have another opportunity to get a forward like Demidov. I think they will have another opportunity to get a RHD like Lev
Styles
No Light, No Signal
- Apr 6, 2017
- 8,376
- 13,589
Waiting all this time and my f***ing power goes out and won’t be restored until 8:30EST. FML
ChiHawks10
Registered User
If they're drafting top 3 next year, and top 5 the year after(which are both pretty damn likely) then how not?
Hawkaholic
Registered User
I would, but I highly doubt the Hawks will, unfortunately.
TheFridge
Registered User
- Mar 20, 2022
- 1,669
- 1,779
Why not? Because they're not going to have a high enough pick again or because Demidov is a once-in-a-generation answer to the "who will play with Bedard" question?
- Status
