Fingers crossed it’s Byram!My bet is 17th + CMM as a framework for Chychrun or a similar defenseman.
They’ll wait until a few names they want to drop start to fall
Fingers crossed it’s Byram!My bet is 17th + CMM as a framework for Chychrun or a similar defenseman.
They’ll wait until a few names they want to drop start to fall
Chat GPT thinks Bob got the top 10 correct the last four years? Yeah, it definitely doesn't fully understand the question. I just checked last year and the only ones he had spot on were 1 and 4.Another fun fact courtesy of ChatGTP:
Bob McKenzie's draft rankings for the top 10 picks over the past five years have shown an average difference of just 0.18 from the actual draft positions. This indicates a very high level of accuracy in predicting the top picks in the NHL draft. The detailed statistics for each year and player are available in the displayed table.
McKenzie_Rank vs. Actual Position
1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12, # 2019
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, # 2020
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, # 2021
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, # 2022
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 # 2023
View attachment 888768
Edit: not sure about this at all though.. didn’t Arizona pick someone way out of left field really high a year ago or so?
Congratulations you have raised Earth's temperature 0.1° C by asking ChatGPT this question and getting this nonsensical answer!Another fun fact courtesy of ChatGTP:
Bob McKenzie's draft rankings for the top 10 picks over the past five years have shown an average difference of just 0.18 from the actual draft positions. This indicates a very high level of accuracy in predicting the top picks in the NHL draft. The detailed statistics for each year and player are available in the displayed table.
McKenzie_Rank vs. Actual Position
1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12, # 2019
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, # 2020
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, # 2021
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, # 2022
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 # 2023
View attachment 888768
Edit: not sure about this at all though..
It’s ok. None of us watched it, so unless the spread sheets show it? It didn’t happen.Congratulations you have raised Earth's temperature 0.1° C by asking ChatGPT this question and getting this nonsensical answer!
In the overall big picture getting a true offensive Dman in this draft would be great but playing 4 extra games took that out of reach.I would give up considerable assets to come away from this draft with Buium or Parekh. They desperately need a dynamic offensive facilitator from the back-end. Very unlikely they're able to position themselves to do it but...when thinking about how best to upgrade the blueline that idea beats the vast majority IMO.
Um that is weird. And I'm a sci-fi guy.
Likely so. Unless they pick Sti-Fence Solberg and he layers up.In the overall big picture getting a true offensive Dman in this draft would be great but playing 4 extra games took that out of reach.
You are welcome!Congratulations you have raised Earth's temperature 0.1° C by asking ChatGPT this question and getting this nonsensical answer!
Levshunov! Maybe Yakemchuk if he gets into top 10Biggest bust potential in the top 10 imho: Lindstrom.
Definitely the evil selfish one.Macklin is one Medieval Prince looking motherf***er.