Prospect Info: 2024 New Jersey Devils Draft Review

StevenToddIves

Registered User
May 18, 2013
11,077
27,989
Brooklyn, NY
2024 NEW JERSEY DEVILS DRAFT REVIEW
The most important way to start this is to say the Devils finest move was not trading the #10 overall pick. The Devils are still building and need more pieces for the core. In LD Anton Silayev and G Mikhail Yegorov, they have potentially found two. No one expected Silayev to be available at #10, and his trade value already far exceeds the rumored returns for the pick prior to the draft. And he fits a player type the Devils sorely need.

1st Round (10): LD ANTON SILAYEV, Nizhny Novgorod KHL
I don’t think there’s any way the Devils felt Silayev would be available at #10. With two potential all-world young offensively gifted defensemen already on the roster in LD Luke Hughes and RD Simon Nemec and potentially another one on the way in RD Seamus Casey, NJ hit a home run in taking the defenseman with the greatest shut-down potential in the draft in Silayev.

Silayev is 6’7-205 and is a gifted, effortless skater. We often hear the term “skates well for a big man”, but Silayev skates beautiful for an any-sized man. With his sheer athleticism, graceful mechanics and long, powerful stride Silayev can cover huge swaths of ice in the blink of an eye. His 4-way mobility and agility are almost freakishly good. If he can improve his acceleration — the one simply “okay” point of his skating — Silayev can become one of the handful of best skating defenders in the NHL.

Silayev’s combination of size, wingspan and speed make him an absolute defensive weapon. You can’t beat him to the outside or inside no matter how fast or good with the puck you are, because he covers so much ice that the outside and inside are simply too far away. He seemingly clogs up half the ice at once singlehandedly. Silayev adds to this by being a very smart positional and anticipatory defender with excellent gaps and great decision making off the puck. He’s also very strong and willing to mix it up physically. He’s easily projectable as an elite NHL defender who is virtually impossible to beat one-on-one in any singular aspect.

Offensively, Silayev is not to be confused with Cale Makar or Quinn Hughes, but that does not mean he has no potential in this respect. He’s very good with the outlet passing game and has the speed and puck-protection ability to rush the puck himself. In the offensive zone he shows a good shot and the ability to activate off the point to create scoring opportunities. He has the upside of a 2PP player who can top the 40+ point threshold at the highest levels. If he has a weakness, it’s that strong forechecking can force him into questionable puck decisions, but it would also be a mistake to label him error-prone, because his play with the puck is already quite sound at the KHL level. Experience should iron this out.

Silayev was an outstanding pick who offers the perfect defensive compliment to the Devils almost unbelievably talented stable of young blueliners. It is incredibly enticing to envision the quartet of RDs Nemec + Casey and LDs Luke Hughes and Silayev as, one day, the best defensive core in the entirety of the NHL.


2nd Round (49) G MIKHAIL YEGOROV, Omaha USHL

Without pretending to be an expert on goaltending, several experts have stated that Yegorov is the most talented netminder with the highest upside of any goalie in the 2024 class. Like Silayev, Yegorov combines great size (6’5-187) with an almost freakish level of athleticism. Like all amateur goaltenders, he has some fundamentals to improve upon, but he will return to the USHL next year before going to a top-notch Boston University program for the 2025-26 campaign.

Drafting goaltenders is playing the long game, for sure. This is not a player we can expect to see with the big club any time soon. But it is crucial to note that the payoff is potentially huge. Judging by the mix of size and athleticism and the sterling reports on his character, this is a young man with the potential to be a high-end NHL starting goaltender. And therefore, the pick is worth the risk.

It’s also important to note that the Devils did not start the draft with this pick — they received it (as well as a 2nd rounder in 2025) in exchange for RD John Marino in a trade with Utah. So due credit must be given to Tom Fitzgerald for making a strong draft-day deal which allowed them to make this pick.


The Two 3rd Round Picks
The Devils turned their attention to filling the future bottom 6 with power wingers, and grabbed two huge, mobile and physical kids out of Scandinavia with RW Kasper Pikkarainen (TPS, Finland Jr.) and RW Herman Traff (HV71, Sweden Jr.).

The son of former Devil Ilkka Pikkarainen, Kasper is listed at 6’3-190 and, with an August birthday, was one of the youngest players in the 2024 draft class. He’s a strong shooter who plays a physical, interior north/south style game. He has a lot of work to do in his reads and play off the puck and, though I would call him mobile for his size, his skating could use some refinement. But he’s very young and has upside and is worth monitoring closely in the years to come, though it’s important to realize that he’s several years from competing for a professional roster.

Herman Traff is 6’3-215 and one of the most proactively physical forwards in the draft. He lives to hit and mix it up. He is also a strong shooter who plays an interior, north/south style. Like Pikkarainen, his strongest offensive feature is his shooting and he has some refinement ahead of him in his skating and off-puck game.

These are both players I had ranked in my top 75 and liked heading into the draft. I must add a disclaimer that, as they are similar-type players at the same RW position, I would have preferred the Devils take one of them and also drafted LD Matvei Shuravin — a 1st round caliber talent who fell to Florida later in the round. But in a vacuum, these are both intriguing players who potentially fill an organizational need for interior, physical forwards and as such must be considered solid selections.


The Other Goalie
With pick #146 in the 5th round, the Devils went back to the pipes and selected G Veeti Louhivaara, a huge 6’4-207 specimen from JVP (Finland Jr.). Although not as freakishly athletic as Yegorov, Louhivaara’s athleticism is very good for the position and he was quite highly regarded coming into the draft year.

Unfortunately, Louhivaara was involved in a serious car accident in which he sustained major injuries. Louhivaara was never fully healthy in the 2023-24 campaign and it showed in his play. But in the 5th round, the Devils decided to roll the dice on the idea that a fully recovered Louhivaara will take off in his development going forward. As this is clearly a talented kid at a crucial position, I’d have to say this is a very intelligent chance to take as late as Round 5.


The Two Over-Aged Centers
If there’s a criticism I have for the Devils 2024 draft, it’s taking double over-aged centers Max Graham (#139) and Matyas Melovsky (#171) in the 5th and 6th rounds. It’s a small criticism relative to an excellent draft day, because these are very late picks, after all.

But it absolutely bears noting that either of these players could have been signed to a tryout contract an hour after the draft ended. What are the odds that Graham, with 42 points in 67 games for Kelowna as a 20 year old and known best for hitting and fighting, would have been taken later in the draft? Or that Melovsky — a defensive specialist who skates well — would not have lasted another 30 picks?

Melovsky at least fills an immediate organizational need, as he should be a depth center in the AHL as early as next season. Graham is a greater question, as he is more difficult to project in anything greater than a minor league enforcer role.

It’s a minor criticism, but the smart money may have been to hold out hope these two made it through the final handful of picks, and instead sign them both to tryout deals after drafting two players with more discernible upside.


In Conclusion
The day must be considered a success for Devils fans, plain and simple.

Anton Silayev is an absolute victory for the New Jersey organization — a rare and talented player and surefire future key piece of a winning core. Yegorov gives the Devils their best hope in years for a future star goaltender. And a few later picks brimming with NHL possibility.

No team is perfect and no draft is perfect, but it is my strong conviction that the 2024 NHL Draft will long be remembered as a banner day for the New Jersey Devils.
 

evnted

Registered User
Apr 14, 2016
815
2,022
great review, and totally agreed. silayev alone probably makes the class, but there was still a strong trio of picks made after him. ill probably need a week or two to really deep dive the remainder of the selections (im at least somewhat familiar with melovsky), though i dont anticipate raving about any of them

still a bit unsure of our overall draft philosophy even as a fan of a number of individual picks being made. i like the value, i just dont always love how they all pair together. would prefer going back to making a couple high upside swings in the later rounds, too. begging tom for any sort of legitimate C prospect at this point lol
 

MasterofGrond

No, I'm not serious.
Feb 13, 2009
17,436
12,401
Rochester, NY
Should have taken Shuravin instead of Traff. Should have drafted anybody else in the 5th and 6th rounds.

But they have one pick I love, another I'm pretty happy with, and two I think are reasonable bets. I also appreciate that Fitz knew he could wait in the third and got more picks before selecting his guy. More picks are more ammo for depth pieces as the team looks to compete next year.

Overall, it's an above average draft only brought down by by some fringe choices. Couple different decisions and NJ would have been in a draft grade tier right below SJ.
 

StevenToddIves

Registered User
May 18, 2013
11,077
27,989
Brooklyn, NY
If Silayev hits the way they hope and they add one goalie and one other third line player it will have been a very successful draft.
If Silayev hits, it's a great draft. And I'd say this is very likely. If Yegorov also hits? Than it's an absolute franchise-altering draft. It would be foolish of me to diminish it because of a couple questionable decisions in rounds 5 and 6.

My one true regret is not getting Shuravin -- a 6'4 (and still growing) strong defensive presence who is one of the best skating defensemen in the class and also has some offensive upside. I really, really like this kid. LW Kevin He was another player I would've very much liked in Round 3.

But overall, the 2024 draft must be considered a win for the Devils.
 

Clam Jensen

Registered User
Apr 8, 2008
4,944
8,770
NJ
If Silayev hits, it's a great draft. And I'd say this is very likely. If Yegorov also hits? Than it's an absolute franchise-altering draft. It would be foolish of me to diminish it because of a couple questionable decisions in rounds 5 and 6.

My one true regret is not getting Shuravin -- a 6'4 (and still growing) strong defensive presence who is one of the best skating defensemen in the class and also has some offensive upside. I really, really like this kid. LW Kevin He was another player I would've very much liked in Round 3.

But overall, the 2024 draft must be considered a win for the Devils.
I know you have no insider information with the org, but I’ve been following you for long enough to know that the guys you usually recommend the devils take in the later rounds who they pass on go on to have success elsewhere. Why do you think the devils don’t pull the trigger on those guys?
 

StevenToddIves

Registered User
May 18, 2013
11,077
27,989
Brooklyn, NY
I know you have no insider information with the org, but I’ve been following you for long enough to know that the guys you usually recommend the devils take in the later rounds who they pass on go on to have success elsewhere. Why do you think the devils don’t pull the trigger on those guys?
Well, the Devils have successfully drafted my sleepers before, from Jesper Bratt to Arseni Gritsyuk. Some of them have not worked out as well, like Aarne Talvitie and Case McCarthy.

Last year, they drafted a big-time sleeper of mine in Daniil Karpovich and two more the year before in Artem Barabosha and Daniil Orlov.

Personally, I have to say while I see eye-to-eye with the Devils' Russian scouting, I am a bit on a different page than the rest of the scouting team. I will say that I had both Pikkarainen and Traff in the range of my top 75 and like both players.

The only Devils pick this year I thought was truly godawful was Max Graham in the 5th round. But a bad pick in the 5th when you hit potential grand slams at #10 and #49 still must be considered a terrific draft.
 

Clam Jensen

Registered User
Apr 8, 2008
4,944
8,770
NJ
Well, the Devils have successfully drafted my sleepers before, from Jesper Bratt to Arseni Gritsyuk. Some of them have not worked out as well, like Aarne Talvitie and Case McCarthy.

Last year, they drafted a big-time sleeper of mine in Daniil Karpovich and two more the year before in Artem Barabosha and Daniil Orlov.

Personally, I have to say while I see eye-to-eye with the Devils' Russian scouting, I am a bit on a different page than the rest of the scouting team. I will say that I had both Pikkarainen and Traff in the range of my top 75 and like both players.

The only Devils pick this year I thought was truly godawful was Max Graham in the 5th round. But a bad pick in the 5th when you hit potential grand slams at #10 and #49 still must be considered a terrific draft.
all good context, thank you! I know you and @Guadana have been singing the praises of Karpovich, Orlov, and Barabosha so I do feel like the scouts have done their due diligence there.
 

Jason MacIsaac

Registered User
Jan 13, 2004
22,512
6,706
Halifax, NS
The draft is over so “should have could haves” will only drive you insane. It’s all about development at this point. I believe, based on videos, that NJ targeted players live breath eat hockey so you hope they all have the work ethic and natural ability to improve substantially. If so, NJ might end up with some nice power forward depth. If not they will resemble the graveyard of bigs from previous drafts.
 

StevenToddIves

Registered User
May 18, 2013
11,077
27,989
Brooklyn, NY
The draft is over so “should have could haves” will only drive you insane. It’s all about development at this point. I believe, based on videos, that NJ targeted players live breath eat hockey so you hope they all have the work ethic and natural ability to improve substantially. If so, NJ might end up with some nice power forward depth. If not they will resemble the graveyard of bigs from previous drafts.
I mean, my sanity is probably to be considered tenuous to begin with, but overall it's great advice.
 

Jason MacIsaac

Registered User
Jan 13, 2004
22,512
6,706
Halifax, NS
I mean, my sanity is probably to be considered tenuous to begin with, but overall it's great advice.
Sorry, I didn’t mean to put that in this thread and in no way am I saying you are the type I insinuate does this. I still hear about Point and Chatham weekly on some medium. In general I try to divide drafting and development into two different categories.
 

glenwo2

JESPER BRATWURST
Oct 18, 2008
52,495
24,981
New Jersey(No Fanz!)
2024 NEW JERSEY DEVILS DRAFT REVIEW
The most important way to start this is to say the Devils finest move was not trading the #10 overall pick. The Devils are still building and need more pieces for the core. In LD Anton Silayev and G Mikhail Yegorov, they have potentially found two. No one expected Silayev to be available at #10, and his trade value already far exceeds the rumored returns for the pick prior to the draft. And he fits a player type the Devils sorely need.

1st Round (10): LD ANTON SILAYEV, Nizhny Novgorod KHL
I don’t think there’s any way the Devils felt Silayev would be available at #10. With two potential all-world young offensively gifted defensemen already on the roster in LD Luke Hughes and RD Simon Nemec and potentially another one on the way in RD Seamus Casey, NJ hit a home run in taking the defenseman with the greatest shut-down potential in the draft in Silayev.

Silayev is 6’7-205 and is a gifted, effortless skater. We often hear the term “skates well for a big man”, but Silayev skates beautiful for an any-sized man. With his sheer athleticism, graceful mechanics and long, powerful stride Silayev can cover huge swaths of ice in the blink of an eye. His 4-way mobility and agility are almost freakishly good. If he can improve his acceleration — the one simply “okay” point of his skating — Silayev can become one of the handful of best skating defenders in the NHL.

Silayev’s combination of size, wingspan and speed make him an absolute defensive weapon. You can’t beat him to the outside or inside no matter how fast or good with the puck you are, because he covers so much ice that the outside and inside are simply too far away. He seemingly clogs up half the ice at once singlehandedly. Silayev adds to this by being a very smart positional and anticipatory defender with excellent gaps and great decision making off the puck. He’s also very strong and willing to mix it up physically. He’s easily projectable as an elite NHL defender who is virtually impossible to beat one-on-one in any singular aspect.

Offensively, Silayev is not to be confused with Cale Makar or Quinn Hughes, but that does not mean he has no potential in this respect. He’s very good with the outlet passing game and has the speed and puck-protection ability to rush the puck himself. In the offensive zone he shows a good shot and the ability to activate off the point to create scoring opportunities. He has the upside of a 2PP player who can top the 40+ point threshold at the highest levels. If he has a weakness, it’s that strong forechecking can force him into questionable puck decisions, but it would also be a mistake to label him error-prone, because his play with the puck is already quite sound at the KHL level. Experience should iron this out.

Silayev was an outstanding pick who offers the perfect defensive compliment to the Devils almost unbelievably talented stable of young blueliners. It is incredibly enticing to envision the quartet of RDs Nemec + Casey and LDs Luke Hughes and Silayev as, one day, the best defensive core in the entirety of the NHL.


2nd Round (49) G MIKHAIL YEGOROV, Omaha USHL

Without pretending to be an expert on goaltending, several experts have stated that Yegorov is the most talented netminder with the highest upside of any goalie in the 2024 class. Like Silayev, Yegorov combines great size (6’5-187) with an almost freakish level of athleticism. Like all amateur goaltenders, he has some fundamentals to improve upon, but he will return to the USHL next year before going to a top-notch Boston University program for the 2025-26 campaign.

Drafting goaltenders is playing the long game, for sure. This is not a player we can expect to see with the big club any time soon. But it is crucial to note that the payoff is potentially huge. Judging by the mix of size and athleticism and the sterling reports on his character, this is a young man with the potential to be a high-end NHL starting goaltender. And therefore, the pick is worth the risk.

It’s also important to note that the Devils did not start the draft with this pick — they received it (as well as a 2nd rounder in 2025) in exchange for RD John Marino in a trade with Utah. So due credit must be given to Tom Fitzgerald for making a strong draft-day deal which allowed them to make this pick.


The Two 3rd Round Picks
The Devils turned their attention to filling the future bottom 6 with power wingers, and grabbed two huge, mobile and physical kids out of Scandinavia with RW Kasper Pikkarainen (TPS, Finland Jr.) and RW Herman Traff (HV71, Sweden Jr.).

The son of former Devil Ilkka Pikkarainen, Kasper is listed at 6’3-190 and, with an August birthday, was one of the youngest players in the 2024 draft class. He’s a strong shooter who plays a physical, interior north/south style game. He has a lot of work to do in his reads and play off the puck and, though I would call him mobile for his size, his skating could use some refinement. But he’s very young and has upside and is worth monitoring closely in the years to come, though it’s important to realize that he’s several years from competing for a professional roster.

Herman Traff is 6’3-215 and one of the most proactively physical forwards in the draft. He lives to hit and mix it up. He is also a strong shooter who plays an interior, north/south style. Like Pikkarainen, his strongest offensive feature is his shooting and he has some refinement ahead of him in his skating and off-puck game.

These are both players I had ranked in my top 75 and liked heading into the draft. I must add a disclaimer that, as they are similar-type players at the same RW position, I would have preferred the Devils take one of them and also drafted LD Matvei Shuravin — a 1st round caliber talent who fell to Florida later in the round. But in a vacuum, these are both intriguing players who potentially fill an organizational need for interior, physical forwards and as such must be considered solid selections.


The Other Goalie
With pick #146 in the 5th round, the Devils went back to the pipes and selected G Veeti Louhivaara, a huge 6’4-207 specimen from JVP (Finland Jr.). Although not as freakishly athletic as Yegorov, Louhivaara’s athleticism is very good for the position and he was quite highly regarded coming into the draft year.

Unfortunately, Louhivaara was involved in a serious car accident in which he sustained major injuries. Louhivaara was never fully healthy in the 2023-24 campaign and it showed in his play. But in the 5th round, the Devils decided to roll the dice on the idea that a fully recovered Louhivaara will take off in his development going forward. As this is clearly a talented kid at a crucial position, I’d have to say this is a very intelligent chance to take as late as Round 5.


The Two Over-Aged Centers
If there’s a criticism I have for the Devils 2024 draft, it’s taking double over-aged centers Max Graham (#139) and Matyas Melovsky (#171) in the 5th and 6th rounds. It’s a small criticism relative to an excellent draft day, because these are very late picks, after all.

But it absolutely bears noting that either of these players could have been signed to a tryout contract an hour after the draft ended. What are the odds that Graham, with 42 points in 67 games for Kelowna as a 20 year old and known best for hitting and fighting, would have been taken later in the draft? Or that Melovsky — a defensive specialist who skates well — would not have lasted another 30 picks?

Melovsky at least fills an immediate organizational need, as he should be a depth center in the AHL as early as next season. Graham is a greater question, as he is more difficult to project in anything greater than a minor league enforcer role.

It’s a minor criticism, but the smart money may have been to hold out hope these two made it through the final handful of picks, and instead sign them both to tryout deals after drafting two players with more discernible upside.


In Conclusion
The day must be considered a success for Devils fans, plain and simple.

Anton Silayev is an absolute victory for the New Jersey organization — a rare and talented player and surefire future key piece of a winning core. Yegorov gives the Devils their best hope in years for a future star goaltender. And a few later picks brimming with NHL possibility.

No team is perfect and no draft is perfect, but it is my strong conviction that the 2024 NHL Draft will long be remembered as a banner day for the New Jersey Devils.
So what is your overall grade?

A?

B?

C?
 
  • Like
Reactions: StevenToddIves

evnted

Registered User
Apr 14, 2016
815
2,022
Well, I guess it's time for @evnted to round up @Guadana and myself for some sort of draft review.

The rule should be: "funniest take on the Max Graham pick wins".

I'll start: "sure he's likely to be the guy taking out Nancy Kerrigan's remaining good knee in four years, but the pick sends a message."
give me a little bit more time for some viewings. i want to make sure my max graham complaints are as accurate as possible :sarcasm:
 

Guadana

Registered User
Mar 7, 2012
8,581
22,947
St Petersburg
Well, I guess it's time for @evnted to round up @Guadana and myself for some sort of draft review.

The rule should be: "funniest take on the Max Graham pick wins".

I'll start: "sure he's likely to be the guy taking out Nancy Kerrigan's remaining good knee in four years, but the pick sends a message."
Im studying players. Need more time.


Overall Im happy with Silayev. Im joying to have so greatly talented player, im happy to have so greatly talented defensive defenseman with size, skating, defensive instincts and defensive vision, im happy to have so greatly talented Russian player.

I can say nothing about Yegorov. Like I said - okay development programm, not on the level with Russian development programm at all, but still he had base from CSKA programm and it was a very good place to learn. He didnt have as much opportunity there, there are huge competition for spots so I understand why he decided to go in the much more friendly organisation where he will be much better goalie.

I would prefer Mustard. I dont like how Devils tried to solve the problem with center depth.
Or Artamonov. I think he is NHLer. Or Muggli. Or Stiga.

For now Im not a fan of Pikkarainen pick. I would prefer Traff if we wanted big guy with some offensive potential. And Shuravin by the next pick. Guy has real NHL potential - big, mobile defenseman with good gap control and enough good skills with the puck. Even if both Traff and Pikka are both good to be drafted there - I dont like management. With Mercer, Lenny, Bratt and some other players from previous drafts I dont see why we should spend two more picks for two more right wingers with "depth" potential. Devils can find NHL wingers for this role for reasonable price on the market.
I like Traff in vacuum. He has some kind of "Zetterlund" potential.
I would be okay if he was the only one. But he wasnt. Shuravin and He were available. But we wanted only big only forwards only righties.

We made a pick for another goalie. From Finland. Fitz started to draft Russians, but not from MHL-KHL. We could draft Porier. Not a big fan but he could be better center pick than what we taked. Veeti is interesting prospect, wish him well, should be a good story if he will recover. But he was a second goalie. I would like his pick much more, if we would draft Mustard. Or Artamonov(Carolina did it).
We drafted second goalie, after Carolina drafted Porier and Kol. Kol was a great pick.

I cant buy Grahame and Melovsky. Devils could swing for potential. Krutov was there. At least for one pick. We could draft for big potential.
We didnt on this draft. At all. All of this type of players could be available for free on free agent NCAA market or on waivers or in trades for the same picks, but with more proven history.

For me its a waste a lot of picks. We will not find good NHL producers in this players. Our forward depth isnt better after this draft even with 4 picks for forwards. I dont like strategy at all. Im watching at Carolina and they are drafting for potential draft after draft after draft after draft. Most of this players will not be great, but some of them will develop well. Ponomaryov was a part of the trade for Guentzel.
Guys like Brown, or Hauser, or Hurtig, or Cheslock will not be a part of the trade for important players. Nikishin will be huge part of defensive core of Carolina. Im not telling that we should draft Russians only 0 we could draft Mustard, Stiga, He, Poirier, Walton, Muggli in different rounds. And Krutov could be a huge pick in the end for higher upside.

_______

Im very happy with Silayevs pick, Im good with Yegorov even if I would prefer other players, Im good with Traff, hope guy will develop his positional game.
I dont like other picks from strategy and potential points of view. I hope Melovsky will help as defensive center, he was productive on WJC, may be he will find his touch and may be we will see him for a couple of games.

Overall it looks like "Yo, head scout, give me best defensive defenseman in this group of defenseman. Goalie scout, give me best goalie. Scout from finland, i need big rw, give your finn. Okay, sweden scout, give your swede, he needs to be big, better if he is rw. Goalie scout, dont sleep, give me more big goalie for insurance - this year was disaster and its time to through Akira away. CHL scout, my lovely, give me canadien vsshole without any potential, as always like you do. So... the last pick. Yo, Russian, give me mh... no, you already had your boy, go away, we dont need second best player on the draft. Hey, Czech scout, give me your czech, I need center. Everybody crying about centers, especially AHL fans. I need to shut them up."

_______

Yes, its not optimistic. I like smart strategy and management. I dont like to waste picks without any opportunity to find big talent deep in the draft. I dont like it at all.

So Silayev, Yegorov and Traff. For me its enough to name this draft as a good draft. But I want to have 1-2 players in the middle or in the end of the draft even with little but hope for "may be he will develop into solid top-6 player or top-4 defenseman if everything will go in the right direction".

A for Silayev. B for Yegorov and Traff. B for trading back - this players were right candidates to make trade back. F for not drafting players with higher ceiling in the middle and in the end of the draft.
 

Billdo

Registered User
Oct 28, 2008
19,900
17,204
Ocean County
Well, the Devils have successfully drafted my sleepers before, from Jesper Bratt to Arseni Gritsyuk. Some of them have not worked out as well, like Aarne Talvitie and Case McCarthy.

Last year, they drafted a big-time sleeper of mine in Daniil Karpovich and two more the year before in Artem Barabosha and Daniil Orlov.

Personally, I have to say while I see eye-to-eye with the Devils' Russian scouting, I am a bit on a different page than the rest of the scouting team. I will say that I had both Pikkarainen and Traff in the range of my top 75 and like both players.

The only Devils pick this year I thought was truly godawful was Max Graham in the 5th round. But a bad pick in the 5th when you hit potential grand slams at #10 and #49 still must be considered a terrific draft.
Man I LOVED the McCarthy pick at the time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: StevenToddIves

StevenToddIves

Registered User
May 18, 2013
11,077
27,989
Brooklyn, NY
Man I LOVED the McCarthy pick at the time.
I was a huge fan of McCarthy, too.

Picking sleepers is very difficult, which is why many draft writers avoid trying to do it or call a guy ranked around 30-40 a top 20 pick their big "sleeper".

And when you pick out 5-15 potential sleepers per year like I do, you're going to be wrong a lot. But when you hit on one, I have to say it's the best feeling as a draft writer. It's the ultimate pay off for hope and optimism, as well as for both the hard work of the player in question and the draftniks who believe in them.

I mean, I don't too much pride in guaranteeing that Auston Matthews would be a superstar, but Brock Faber and Jesper Bratt fill me with pride every time I watch them on the ice. I'm still hoping McCarthy rounds out into a 6/7 NHL roster guy, but his development arc just didn't go as high as I foresaw.
 

Guadana

Registered User
Mar 7, 2012
8,581
22,947
St Petersburg
I was a huge fan of McCarthy, too.

Picking sleepers is very difficult, which is why many draft writers avoid trying to do it or call a guy ranked around 30-40 a top 20 pick their big "sleeper".

And when you pick out 5-15 potential sleepers per year like I do, you're going to be wrong a lot. But when you hit on one, I have to say it's the best feeling as a draft writer. It's the ultimate pay off for hope and optimism, as well as for both the hard work of the player in question and the draftniks who believe in them.

I mean, I don't too much pride in guaranteeing that Auston Matthews would be a superstar, but Brock Faber and Jesper Bratt fill me with pride every time I watch them on the ice. I'm still hoping McCarthy rounds out into a 6/7 NHL roster guy, but his development arc just didn't go as high as I foresaw.
Its okay. Some players just can't do next steps. You never know who will stop and who will continue, in which directions.
 

BurntToast

Registered User
May 27, 2007
3,506
2,916
Saratoga, New York
Rumor going around was Zeev fell because of Cutter. A lot team were worried how Cutter and his agent handled that situation.

Zeev shares the same agent. Sounds crazy, but plausible.

Overall draft grades have been a B. Some feel the goalie in round two has the tools to be awesome but got a 2nd round grade because of his numbers on a bad team.
 

StevenToddIves

Registered User
May 18, 2013
11,077
27,989
Brooklyn, NY
@StevenToddIves You mentioned Shuravin already, but would it be possible to get your take on who you would have picked for each of these picks? Like 1-3 players and if any of these selections are among yours. Would be interesting to know and follow as these prospects progress.
I kind of hate doing this for the simple reason that, were I in a room full of scouts, I would not have argued against Silayev as the pick because it also made sense even though my personal preference may have been Zeev Buium. It was close between players at the top of the draft, and NJ selected an outstanding prospect who fits the team best as constructed by the current GM and scouting teams.

In the 2nd round, I would've probably cast a vote for John Mustard or Ondrej Kos, but again, if the goalie scouting was especially high in Yegorov I would have been fine with that pick, as well.

I can say with confidence that my 3rd round picks would have been LD Matvei Shuravin and LW Kevin He. I also like Pikkarainen and Traff (both in my top 75 range), but I feel Shuravin is a 1st round talent and would've argued heavily for him.

In the 5th Round I would've argued heavily against the Graham pick in favor of a high upside forward like Poirier, or at least Krutov. The Louhivaara pick again I would have been ok with if the goalie scouting loved him.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad