I think the point being made is that a 19 year old Patric Bergeron is a better deployment than a 26 Year old Galchenyuk when trying to defend a lead.
Experience doesn't automatically make someone better than another. It helps, but there are exceptions.
As there would be when you have a talent like Demidov and you are down a goal. It doesn't matter how much experience Randulic gets, he's never gonna be a better offensive threat than a 18 year old Demidov.
It still doesn't make sense even if that's what he means. Galchenyuk doesn't get used in those situations in the first place. The choices would have to be between a rookie and a veteran who gets used in those situations often. If the choice is between a rookie Beck or Caufield, then yea Beck makes far more sense. If the choice is between Beck or Suzuki/Dvorak/Armia/Evans, then it makes sense to go with the veteran if the goal is to win the game.
I said experience isn't everything, so yes if one of the players is far more talented than the other, then that could be worth more than the difference in experience.
Because THAT was the specific point that I addressed from Vincent's press conference.
And we already went past that by point, so I'm not sure why you are going back to talking only about faceoffs.
For faceoffs, experience matters less, and technique matters more, so you'll see young players be better at faceoffs than experienced veterans, but you can't extrapolate this and apply it to all situations. There's only a few possible scenarios when taking a faceoff, whereas when playing at 5 on 5, there's a million different things that could happen. A veteran who experienced many different scenarios and has done it several times will be better equiped to handle those situations.
You can keep saying it's complete nonsense, but again, this kind of thinking only really is applied this way in hockey. In no other sport do teams prefer to use worse players simply because they're more experienced.
Well usually those veterans that are used are not much worse than that rookie player. A 25 year old Beck will likely be much better than the current Evans, but a 20 year old Beck is probably not.
"Humans get better through experience and practice".
You think rookies have never played hockey before stepping onto the ice in the NHL?
Yawn.
Do you realize there's a vast difference between the NHL and other leagues? There's a reason why many star players from other leagues are unable to become decent nhl players.
The game is a game is a mistakes and they happen all the time, thinking that just because a player is more experienced, it means they're less likely to make mistakes is ridiculous. At some point, you've got to stop believing fairytales man.
Do you make the same mistakes in life as when you were 10-20 years younger?