As a third party who's read your comments (and
@MS ) I'm reasonably confident one of two things is going on:
1) You in fact do
not understand what MS is telling you - in that, Nabokov's sample size of games played at his age is impressive. That's it. This was not an opinion and if I understood correctly, it's based entirely on historic numbers/performance. As in, if I said: "
Wayne Gretzky has recorded the most points in an NHL season, with 215 points in 1985-86." this is not an opinion,.. additionally, MS does not seem to be suggesting that Nabokov's large sample size of games played (relatively speaking) will mean he's drafted and will find success at the NHL level.
2) You do understand what MS is saying, but you don't care and/or your communication skills are failing you. For instance:
"I understand what you're trying to tell me...I just disagree. That's not a good enough sample size for a 21yo who wouldn't even be draft eligible anymore if he was North American. The guy is small on top of all of this which makes it even more of an unlikely scenario. And if most other 03 born goalies suck as well then that still doesn't mean a thing."
Purple: opinion...
Orange: not relevant to the sample size discussion
Red: not relevant to the sample size discussion
Green: not relevant to the sample size discussion