DANOZ28
Registered User
not that theres anything wrong with helenius (very good skater) however if im mn gm im picking buium.
I suspect Yakemchuk will have a better NHL career than some of the other more highly touted defensive prospects. That kid is built for the NHL. Nevertheless, this is a strong draft. Everyone picking in the top 10 will be getting a core player. And one of them will be Yakemchuk.You tried to use it as evidence that Yakemchuk is ‘climbing’. I was just pointing out that Yakemchuk is doing no such thing. The only person who has Yakemchuk ranked top-5 has always had him top-5.
I'm not unfamiliar with him. I like him, but I don't love him. Wouldn't be shocked if he goes in the top 10, but 3rd, yeah.We’ll see. Yakemchuk has a far greater chance of getting selected 3 by Anaheim than Michkov going 2nd to Anaheim, lol. Based off your prediction last year, you have clearly possess a lack of understanding to the Duck’s drafting philosophy. I would suggest looking into Carter more. I can guarantee he is a top 5 pick come draft day.
I am surprised and interested in your perspective on this statement since The Hockey Writers have 3 of the Sabres' top 5 prospects at centre and Thompson, Cozens, and Krebs with the big club.Buffalo wouldn't reach for Jiricek with both Catton and Helenius available as C is a weakness in their pipeline.
Neither Thompson nor Cozens are especially good at C. Thompson is good offensively but lacking defensive acumen. Cozens is probably better suited on the wing ala Jeff Carter where he's passable but lacks the vision you'd ideally want. Krebs does a lot of stupid crap that you get away with in Juniors. He hasn't shown much that you'd hedge a bet on that he's more than a tweener.I am surprised and interested in your perspective on this statement since The Hockey Writers have 3 of the Sabres' top 5 prospects at centre and Thompson, Cozens, and Krebs with the big club.
Thanks for your reply. The reason for my interest was that I thought Buffalo would be an ideal trade target for a young C given the plethora they seemed to have.Neither Thompson nor Cozens are especially good at C. Thompson is good offensively but lacking defensive acumen. Cozens is probably better suited on the wing ala Jeff Carter where he's passable but lacks the vision you'd ideally want. Krebs does a lot of stupid crap that you get away with in Juniors. He hasn't shown much that you'd hedge a bet on that he's more than a tweener.
Prospect wise you really only have Ostlund as a surefire C. They've been playing Kulich there but he's probably destined for the wing. Savoie is a question whether he'd be better served as a C or that fast, pesky wing. They also have Wahlberg that has played both but so far in the AHL as a 19yo he's looking like he belongs as a power forward winger.
Buffalo cornered the market on highly skilled wings, the problem is most are pretty similarThanks for your reply. The reason for my interest was that I thought Buffalo would be an ideal trade target for a young C given the plethora they seemed to have.
I know the Iginla family connection is there BUT there is no way the Flames should pass on Catton if he slides to 9th OA. Skilled offensively talented centers are non-existent in the Flames system.Rank tankathon for the lottery, feedback is appreciated, enjoy!
1. Chicago Black Hawks: Macklin Celebrini
2. San Jose Sharks: Artyom Levshunov
3. Anaheim Ducks: Carter Yakemchuk
4. Columbus Blue Jackets: Sam Dickinson
5. Montreal Canadiens: Cayden Lindstrom
6. Utah X: Ivan Demidov
7. Ottawa Senators: Zayne Parekh
8. Seattle Kraken: Antyon Silayev
9. Calgary Flames: Tij Iginla
10. New Jersey Devils: Cole Eiserman
11. Buffalo Sabres: Adam Jiricek
12. Philadelphia Flyers: Berkly Catton
13. Minnesota Wild: Konsta Helenius
14. San Jose Sharks: Zev Buium
15. Detroit Red Wings: Michael Bransegg Nygard