Kingfan1967
Registered User
- Oct 6, 2017
- 900
- 926
If Fiala every grows that thing back, it's time for some old school hazing (full body shave)It really was his mustache.
If Fiala every grows that thing back, it's time for some old school hazing (full body shave)It really was his mustache.
Putting Fiala with Byfield has done wonders for both of them. They also looked deadly when Kempe was on the other wing. That should be the #1 line moving forward.
Personally, I want him to keep trying the fancy stuff.If someone could convince him to quit the fancy stuff and play a strict power game, he could be unstoppable.
I disagree to a point. While he needs structure, part of the benefit of being skilled and young is to think outside the box in dealing with problems, which sometimes means doing fancy stuff.Byfield has twice as many points as Kopitar since the turn of the year.
If someone could convince him to quit the fancy stuff and play a strict power game, he could be unstoppable.
Actually no, he does not possess "great" puck skills, vision, etc. He loses confidence for entire games at a time when something unnecessarily fancy doesn't work early on.Personally, I want him to keep trying the fancy stuff.
I understand it won't work all the time and could lead to turnovers/goals against, but the more he tries that stuff, the better he'll get with it.
He's a creative player with great puck skills, vision, and passing ability. Telling him to 'stop trying the fancy stuff' is basically like telling him to ignore his strengths. A huge part of the reason he was drafted 2nd overall was because of his playmaking ability. Let him be creative and make plays. If he's able to establish consistency in his creativity, that could be the difference between him being a ~60 point player and an ~80+ point player.
We complain about LA's lack of offense and creativity and then as soon as a player starts trying to be creative with the puck we want them to remove it from their game and keep it simple?
Nah... If Byfield is going to have a chance in becoming a 1C you can build around, he needs to be able to play freely and creatively.
Actually no, he does not possess "great" puck skills, vision, etc. He loses confidence for entire games at a time when something unnecessarily fancy doesn't work early on.
Byfield pushes the puck, he doesn't carry it well. His strengths are his ability to recover pucks using his tenacity, then using his speed and size to move the puck into dangerous areas with those gifts. His hands are the single biggest deficiency in his game.
The simpler he keeps things, the greater advantage he has over his opponents. When he tries to get tricky he almost always fails and gives away that advantage. He negates his own strengths far more often than being stopped by the opposition.
Disagree with most of this. You're right that Byfield's speed and tenacity are major strengths of his but I think you're wildly underestimating his passing/playmaking ability. Also, his hands are well above NHL average.Actually no, he does not possess "great" puck skills, vision, etc. He loses confidence for entire games at a time when something unnecessarily fancy doesn't work early on.
Byfield pushes the puck, he doesn't carry it well. His strengths are his ability to recover pucks using his tenacity, then using his speed and size to move the puck into dangerous areas with those gifts. His hands are the single biggest deficiency in his game.
The simpler he keeps things, the greater advantage he has over his opponents. When he tries to get tricky he almost always fails and gives away that advantage. He negates his own strengths far more often than being stopped by the opposition.