GDT: 2024-25 season game 10 LA Kings vs San Jose Sharks @7:00pm 10/29/24

Sol

Smile
Jun 30, 2017
24,313
20,406
Are we just making shit up about Kopi at this point? When in his entire f***ing career has he ever been a diva who needed to be appeased?
It’s fair to speculate at this point the question “why” is Kopitar still the number 1 center and treated as if he’s in his prime still.

Players like Getzlaf in recent memory told the team to move himself down the line up to create chances for other players.

It’s fair to assume that Kopitar with all the clout he has on the team can dictate his role on the Kings. Same goes for Doughty.

There is no real reason why Byfield shouldn’t be the number 1 center right now. Kopitar quite literally cannot keep the same energy level up as he used to. Third liner with limited ice time will keep him fresh and producing.
 

Fripp

Registered User
Sep 6, 2005
2,299
537
Portland, OR
That was an all-time lazy performance by everyone over 24 years old. What a soft team. Kempe should be embarrassed by that turnover for the GW goal. I hope they get destroyed tonight.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SaltyElkHunter

KopitarGOAT420

Registered User
Jan 30, 2020
560
839
USA
Yikes that was a bad one. Hard to be optimistic after a loss like that against an absolutely terrible Sharks team. That said, the start to this season has been VERY weird.
  • Doughty injury
  • Byfield looks like a budding superstar in preseason/training camp and then looks like he's somehow instantly regressed 2 years as soon as the season starts (0 goals through 10 games)
  • Kopi cold for the last 6-7 games.
  • Moore off to a very cold start.
  • Danault off to a very cold start and 0 goals through 10 games
  • Fiala playing absolutely awful
  • Even Kempe has been kinda 'mid' despite decent production
  • Laferriere leading the team in goals
  • Clarke leading the team in assists
  • Turcotte forcing himself into more minutes with strong play
  • Kuemper injury (short term but still a factor in all the weirdness/craziness)
  • Starting the season on a 7 game road trip and first 8 out of 10 on the road
  • General really sloppy / undisciplined play from the team
  • Special teams terrible
There's certainly some things to be concerned about don't get me wrong.... And there's definitely a solid chance this team just isn't very good... But honestly the fact that this team has been playing like sh*t and is still sitting at 5-3-2 (somehow 2nd in the division at the moment) is pretty intriguing in my opinion.

I still think we need to see another 5-10 games from this squad before we really know what we have. Could just be a cold start for guys like Byfield, Danault, Fiala, and Moore. If those guys start to turn it around, all of the sudden this Kings team starts to look very formidable. Honestly, this is about as bad as this team can possibly play. So maybe the only way to go from here is up?

If you would've told me Laferriere would be leading the team in goals and Clarke would be leading the team in assists 10 games into the season and the Kings would be 5-3-2 without Drew Doughty I would've been pretty okay with that start and happy to see those young guys having success. I know it's been ugly, but we also know this team isn't playing anywhere near good hockey. Need to hope these guys turn it around soon. They can't stay cold / keep playing poorly forever right??? Lol
 

bland

Registered User
Jul 1, 2004
7,870
12,008
The team direction looks lost.
They aren't lost, they are just in a looooooong overdue transition in identity. That was always going to hurt, and the front office foolishly thought that they could out-plan the inevitable.

The best route was to let the Cup core leave, sign bridge players and nurture the kids until they were ready to forge their own identity. Instead, kids over-ripened on the vine, the Cup core's clout led to bad decisions, and the excess of picks, prospects and cap space used on the middle of the lineup kept them in a bubble playoff spot that the older players and younger kids weren't able or ready to use effectively.

It's just poor decision making and frankly it's all unfolded exactly as predicted in 2015. I get management trying to bleed as much dough out of the goodwill Lombardi created, and I get the sentiment attached to the players who provided the best time for fans in the history of the franchise. But - this was always going to be the cost.
 

tigermask48

Maniacal Laugh
Mar 10, 2004
3,922
1,306
R'Lyeh, Antarctica
It’s fair to speculate at this point the question “why” is Kopitar still the number 1 center and treated as if he’s in his prime still.

Players like Getzlaf in recent memory told the team to move himself down the line up to create chances for other players.

It’s fair to assume that Kopitar with all the clout he has on the team can dictate his role on the Kings. Same goes for Doughty.

There is no real reason why Byfield shouldn’t be the number 1 center right now. Kopitar quite literally cannot keep the same energy level up as he used to. Third liner with limited ice time will keep him fresh and producing.
This is why it's critical to have a management group in place that can sell players on the their vision for the team.

In pro sports you are never going to have ALL the best players, and to win you don't even need any of the best players.

But you do need to be able to identify the right players and sell them on the path the team is on.

That in the end, is the ultimate failure of Blake and Luc's time running the Kings.

It isn't the players, the coaches, the prospects, or anyone else to blame. It's those two having no real vision or plan in place that is the issue with this and every Kings team since 2018.
 

johnjm22

Pseudo Intellectual
Aug 2, 2005
20,852
17,620
I still think we need to see another 5-10 games from this squad before we really know what we have. Could just be a cold start for guys like Byfield, Danault, Fiala, and Moore. If those guys start to turn it around, all of the sudden this Kings team starts to look very formidable.
Hockey can be very unpredictable. So you're right; things could turn around.

But even if they get going, what's their upside? They still won't be anywhere close to a contender.

Trying to win with this roster is total waste of time IMO. We need to start a rebuild.
 

johnjm22

Pseudo Intellectual
Aug 2, 2005
20,852
17,620
They aren't lost, they are just in a looooooong overdue transition in identity. That was always going to hurt, and the front office foolishly thought that they could out-plan the inevitable.
They're not a contender, but they're also not rebuilding. It's the definition of not having a direction.

They're playing young guys because they have no other choice, not because they're trying to transition.
 

Herby

Thank You, Team 144
Feb 27, 2002
26,702
16,703
Great Lakes Area

This has been the case for the last decade. The system isn't exactly the 1980's Soviets, but most of it is the Jimmy and Joe's rather than the X's and O's. You have to go so far back to find the last time the Kings drafted a star forward.
I think I know what you are saying. Stutzle is a pure offense player, while Byfield is that 2-way center mold that the Kings model their potential star centers after Kopitar. It was a mistake having Byfield play in the NHL at age 18. Byfield can still be a good 1C, but he just wasn't a phenom like a Crosby/Ovechkin that could play right away in the NHL. It hasn't helped at all that TMac/Hiller have been Byfield's coaches.

What I find very puzzling from a team perspective, is the fact you have a good deal of offense first young players, but they are being handcuffed by a system that doesn't promote offense(which more teams are adopting as goal scoring is up again this season). Frankly, Hiller is not head coach material. I feel he's less personable with the players, than TMac was(or maybe they are the same?). IMO, I feel the Kings need a coach that can get more offensive production from it's players. To me the players are not buying into what Hiller is trying to preach(I'm not even sure what Hiller is even trying to preach!) PLD tuned out TMac/Hiller. I do agree it was wrong how PLD had a bit of an attitude. It appears Fiala might be showing some similar bad attitude. Something could be rotten in the organization where it's starting to infest into other players not being happy how the team is being run. A firing/trade needs to happen soon before there is some kind of collapse with this team.

How is Byfield a two-way center when he has barely played C over the last three seasons? People think because Byfield is 6'5 that it means he is automatically good defensively, and this season he struggled defensively (and offensively) playing C.

Also, a couple of your other points are just not true.

1. Byfield did not play very much in the NHL at 18. He did not make the Kings out of camp and only played a handful of games at the end of the season.

2. It is not only phenoms who play in the NHL at 18. 90+% of top 2 picks forwards have made the NHL at 18 the last two decades, the majority were not phenoms, and some like Seguin, Hughes and Slafkovsky were largely lost in the NHL at 18, but their teams felt the positives outweighed the negatives, and judging by the careers Kane and Seguin have had, those were the right decisions. The Kings had a prime 2C opening next to a great veteran like Carter, and made a poor choice that went against the traditional proven development strategies. Four years later, Byfield is still not a center.

In fact, you preach patience and slow development with him, yet that is exactly what we have, it was a historically slow development for Byfield based on where he was picked

AHL games by Top 2 pick forwards since 2010

Quinton Byfield - 59 games (including AHL games in his age 20 season)
Sam Reinhart - 3 games

I just don't understand how you can call for a slower development when it was already an all-time slow one. If the development is going to be this slow (a point parroted by Nelson Emerson to Pravda) at what point do you just say, "Let's take the more ready guy"

If you think a player is 5-7 years from hitting his peak on draft night, you should probably not be taking that player with a #2 overall pick.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Schrute farms

Herby

Thank You, Team 144
Feb 27, 2002
26,702
16,703
Great Lakes Area
Yikes that was a bad one. Hard to be optimistic after a loss like that against an absolutely terrible Sharks team. That said, the start to this season has been VERY weird.
  • Doughty injury
  • Byfield looks like a budding superstar in preseason/training camp and then looks like he's somehow instantly regressed 2 years as soon as the season starts (0 goals through 10 games)
  • Kopi cold for the last 6-7 games.
  • Moore off to a very cold start.
  • Danault off to a very cold start and 0 goals through 10 games
  • Fiala playing absolutely awful
  • Even Kempe has been kinda 'mid' despite decent production
  • Laferriere leading the team in goals
  • Clarke leading the team in assists
  • Turcotte forcing himself into more minutes with strong play
  • Kuemper injury (short term but still a factor in all the weirdness/craziness)
  • Starting the season on a 7 game road trip and first 8 out of 10 on the road
  • General really sloppy / undisciplined play from the team
  • Special teams terrible
There's certainly some things to be concerned about don't get me wrong.... And there's definitely a solid chance this team just isn't very good... But honestly the fact that this team has been playing like sh*t and is still sitting at 5-3-2 (somehow 2nd in the division at the moment) is pretty intriguing in my opinion.

I still think we need to see another 5-10 games from this squad before we really know what we have. Could just be a cold start for guys like Byfield, Danault, Fiala, and Moore. If those guys start to turn it around, all of the sudden this Kings team starts to look very formidable. Honestly, this is about as bad as this team can possibly play. So maybe the only way to go from here is up?

If you would've told me Laferriere would be leading the team in goals and Clarke would be leading the team in assists 10 games into the season and the Kings would be 5-3-2 without Drew Doughty I would've been pretty okay with that start and happy to see those young guys having success. I know it's been ugly, but we also know this team isn't playing anywhere near good hockey. Need to hope these guys turn it around soon. They can't stay cold / keep playing poorly forever right??? Lol

1
: causing fear, dread, or apprehension
a formidable prospect

2
: having qualities that discourage approach or attack
a formidable opponent

3
: tending to inspire awe or wonder : IMPRESSIVE
a formidable accomplishment



Is it possible for a team without a star 1C, 1D or 1G be considered formidable?
What is different this year from the previous 3 years?

Nobody is saying this team is a bottom 5 team (although many of us wish that were the case) but for a team that claims to be a contender, for a team that traded two first round picks in recent drafts and their best prospect for immediate help it's absolutely unacceptable to be a middle of the road team. Trading those picks and trading players like Faber should only be made by contending teams, you think this team is a contending team?

They are a 10-20 team in the NHL for the fourth straight season, I just have no idea how you can look at this roster and say it's "formidable",
 

bland

Registered User
Jul 1, 2004
7,870
12,008
They're not a contender, but they're also not rebuilding. It's the definition of not having a direction.

They're playing young guys because they have no other choice, not because they're trying to transition.

No, that IS the transition.

It was always the plan, they just butchered the details. They thought the slow boil with veteran insurance would be a better, more seamless transition. Instead the wheels fell off, the kids suffered, and the moves made to accelerate and fortify the transition were ham-fisted and costly.

But this was always the plan.
 
  • Like
Reactions: KopitarGOAT420

Herby

Thank You, Team 144
Feb 27, 2002
26,702
16,703
Great Lakes Area
They aren't lost, they are just in a looooooong overdue transition in identity. That was always going to hurt, and the front office foolishly thought that they could out-plan the inevitable.

The best route was to let the Cup core leave, sign bridge players and nurture the kids until they were ready to forge their own identity. Instead, kids over-ripened on the vine, the Cup core's clout led to bad decisions, and the excess of picks, prospects and cap space used on the middle of the lineup kept them in a bubble playoff spot that the older players and younger kids weren't able or ready to use effectively.

It's just poor decision making and frankly it's all unfolded exactly as predicted in 2015. I get management trying to bleed as much dough out of the goodwill Lombardi created, and I get the sentiment attached to the players who provided the best time for fans in the history of the franchise. But - this was always going to be the cost.
This is not a transition to youth.

Byfield moving to wing again to hope to spark the team to immediate results is not the action of a team in transition. If they were, Byfield would have been at C all year no matter what, but as always, everything is about trying to win with 11 and 8.

They are continuing to just throw shit at the wall and hoping something sticks.

Other than a 1 or 2 year window coming out of a rebuild (the 09-11 teams) you should never be a fringe playoff team, you should either be a contender to win a couple of rounds or you should be in the accumulation of assets stage. The Kings are neither, in fact they have traded a ton of valuable assets to end up in this middle of the road hell. This is one of the most poorly managed teams in all of professional sports and as far away from a championship as any team in professional sports. Because it's going to take 3-5 years for the next guy to clean up the mess and then another couple of years to do an actual transition. So yeah, maybe if all goes right the window opens up again in 2030-2031.

The destruction caused to this organization by clowns like Robitaille, Blake, Emerson and Murray is just incredible. It completely dwarfs what happened here in the 90's. And those GM's were working under terrible conditions with insolvent owners. These guys have been given every resource they have needed and this is what we have to show in season 8.

Businesses in the private sector don't normally operate like this, the Kings management somehow has the job security of tenured professors and Supreme Court Justices.
 
Last edited:

SaltyElkHunter

I …. am…. The LA Kings!
Apr 24, 2019
3,491
3,448
Utah
This is why it's critical to have a management group in place that can sell players on the their vision for the team.

In pro sports you are never going to have ALL the best players, and to win you don't even need any of the best players.

But you do need to be able to identify the right players and sell them on the path the team is on.

That in the end, is the ultimate failure of Blake and Luc's time running the Kings.

It isn't the players, the coaches, the prospects, or anyone else to blame. It's those two having no real vision or plan in place that is the issue with this and every Kings team since 2018.
I agree there is ZERO buy in from the players. When you have a great nucleus core and coach the sum of the parts is greater than their individual worth. A great team can do amazing things. Guys will bleed and sell out for each other because they do it as a collective.

Instead with Blake and Luc we literally have the Kings of cookie night! Luc never played a defensive shift in his life. Blake was always a mercenary me first player.

These guys were never able to lift a team up and the only way either got a cup was on the shoulders of much better men in Colorado and Detroit teams.

These guys brought in players with their same makeup in Fiala and Dubois and it is inescapable. A rat can’t smell a rat because they have the same scent!
 
  • Like
Reactions: chris kontos

KopitarGOAT420

Registered User
Jan 30, 2020
560
839
USA
Hockey can be very unpredictable. So you're right; things could turn around.

But even if they get going, what's their upside? They still won't be anywhere close to a contender.

Trying to win with this roster is total waste of time IMO. We need to start a rebuild.
You're probably right at this point.

However, I think their upside might actually still be pretty damn high (whether or not it's likely they live up to that upside is a different story). They need a lot of guys to turn their seasons around - but when we're talking upside, we're talking how good can this team possibly be if everyone (or most everyone) is playing well / pulling their weight. Well, if everyone is playing well and pulling their weight, I think this team could actually be pretty nasty.

Is it possible for a team without a star 1C, 1D or 1G be considered formidable?
What is different this year from the previous 3 years?

Nobody is saying this team is a bottom 5 team (although many of us wish that were the case) but for a team that claims to be a contender, for a team that traded two first round picks in recent drafts and their best prospect for immediate help it's absolutely unacceptable to be a middle of the road team. Trading those picks and trading players like Faber should only be made by contending teams, you think this team is a contending team?

They are a 10-20 team in the NHL for the fourth straight season, I just have no idea how you can look at this roster and say it's "formidable",
"What is different from the previous 3 years?"
  • Brandt Clarke
    • Clarke is on pace for 65 points right now and hasn't even been playing his best hockey - The Kings haven't seen offense like that from the blue line in DECADES - that's a very big deal
  • Alex Turcotte
    • Once deemed a bust by 95% of the hockey world, now looking like a strong top 9 player who can drive offense on his own line - that's also huge
  • Alex Laferriere
    • So many Kings fans were ready to write this guy off as nothing more than a 3rd liner after seeing his 22 year old rookie season... Now he looks like a legit top 6 winger / goal scorer and one of the best players on the team - that is, of course, also huge
  • Grit
    • This team actually has a tiny bit of a backbone for the first time in years
I'm not saying this is a formidable team RIGHT NOW..... I admitted they've been playing like crap. I'm saying this COULD be a formidable team if a couple players decide to stop playing like absolute dog sh*t. If Byfield decides he wants to show up. If Danault and Moore decide they want to start playing. If Fiala starts playing like we know he can. Obviously yeah maybe those guys won't turn it around and are just having bad years but we know these guys are pretty damn good hockey players - they can and should be much better - if they are, the Kings will be much better off as an extension.

With Doughty back (assuming he'll be back at some point this season based on what we've heard from the Kings), the Kings' defense is instantly pretty damn good especially with Clarke playing like he's been playing. If Byfield and/or a couple other top 6 forwards pull their heads out of their asses and start playing good hockey, that instantly makes this teams' forward group pretty damn good. The goaltending is suspect but we'll see how that goes.

ALL I'M SAYING, is that we've basically seen the worst from this team and they're still 2nd in the division 10 games in. I understand it hasn't been pretty.... But if anything that's more of a reason to be optimistic IMO. Because we know many of these Kings players who are struggling right now are capable of playing MUCH better. And if they do start playing much better, this Kings team starts to look completely different than it does right now. You might feel differently - that's fine. I'm not saying their definitely a contender - I'm just saying this group has a lot more potential than they've shown so far. Mostly because the vets haven't been pulling their weight.
 

bland

Registered User
Jul 1, 2004
7,870
12,008
Keep in mind @bland they tried to re-sign Matt Roy.

They don't want to play both Spence and Clarke. They're doing it because they have no other choice.

This is not an organization that's TRYING to transition.
I don't really buy that though, I read those comments as pure lip service. They could have kept him if he wanted to stay and they wanted to retain him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SaltyElkHunter

BaileyFan

Registered User
Jun 14, 2023
677
1,359
You're probably right at this point.

However, I think their upside might actually still be pretty damn high (whether or not it's likely they live up to that upside is a different story). They need a lot of guys to turn their seasons around - but when we're talking upside, we're talking how good can this team possibly be if everyone (or most everyone) is playing well / pulling their weight. Well, if everyone is playing well and pulling their weight, I think this team could actually be pretty nasty.


"What is different from the previous 3 years?"
  • Brandt Clarke
    • Clarke is on pace for 65 points right now and hasn't even been playing his best hockey - The Kings haven't seen offense like that from the blue line in DECADES - that's a very big deal
  • Alex Turcotte
    • Once deemed a bust by 95% of the hockey world, now looking like a strong top 9 player who can drive offense on his own line - that's also huge
  • Alex Laferriere
    • So many Kings fans were ready to write this guy off as nothing more than a 3rd liner after seeing his 22 year old rookie season... Now he looks like a legit top 6 winger / goal scorer and one of the best players on the team - that is, of course, also huge
  • Grit
    • This team actually has a tiny bit of a backbone for the first time in years
I'm not saying this is a formidable team RIGHT NOW..... I admitted they've been playing like crap. I'm saying this COULD be a formidable team if a couple players decide to stop playing like absolute dog sh*t. If Byfield decides he wants to show up. If Danault and Moore decide they want to start playing. If Fiala starts playing like we know he can. Obviously yeah maybe those guys won't turn it around and are just having bad years but we know these guys are pretty damn good hockey players - they can and should be much better - if they are, the Kings will be much better off as an extension.

With Doughty back (assuming he'll be back at some point this season based on what we've heard from the Kings), the Kings' defense is instantly pretty damn good especially with Clarke playing like he's been playing. If Byfield and/or a couple other top 6 forwards pull their heads out of their asses and start playing good hockey, that instantly makes this teams' forward group pretty damn good. The goaltending is suspect but we'll see how that goes.

ALL I'M SAYING, is that we've basically seen the worst from this team and they're still 2nd in the division 10 games in. I understand it hasn't been pretty.... But if anything that's more of a reason to be optimistic IMO. Because we know many of these Kings players who are struggling right now are capable of playing MUCH better. And if they do start playing much better, this Kings team starts to look completely different than it does right now. You might feel differently - that's fine. I'm not saying their definitely a contender - I'm just saying this group has a lot more potential than they've shown so far. Mostly because the vets haven't been pulling their weight.
I don’t think we’ve seen the worst of this team yet. They aren’t playing uniquely or unusually below their standards or anything, this is just who they have been since January of this calendar year. They win ugly against the bad teams and they lose ugly against the good teams, with a handful of outliers like last night sprinkled in.

As for the roster’s supposed potential, there are like 25 teams that could make a miracle Cup run if every player magically played the best hockey of his career at the same time for a two month stretch. I don’t doubt that what you’re saying is exactly what the front office is thinking because hope really is a strategy for them though.
 

Herby

Thank You, Team 144
Feb 27, 2002
26,702
16,703
Great Lakes Area
You're probably right at this point.

However, I think their upside might actually still be pretty damn high (whether or not it's likely they live up to that upside is a different story). They need a lot of guys to turn their seasons around - but when we're talking upside, we're talking how good can this team possibly be if everyone (or most everyone) is playing well / pulling their weight. Well, if everyone is playing well and pulling their weight, I think this team could actually be pretty nasty.


"What is different from the previous 3 years?"
  • Brandt Clarke
    • Clarke is on pace for 65 points right now and hasn't even been playing his best hockey - The Kings haven't seen offense like that from the blue line in DECADES - that's a very big deal
  • Alex Turcotte
    • Once deemed a bust by 95% of the hockey world, now looking like a strong top 9 player who can drive offense on his own line - that's also huge
  • Alex Laferriere
    • So many Kings fans were ready to write this guy off as nothing more than a 3rd liner after seeing his 22 year old rookie season... Now he looks like a legit top 6 winger / goal scorer and one of the best players on the team - that is, of course, also huge
  • Grit
    • This team actually has a tiny bit of a backbone for the first time in years
I'm not saying this is a formidable team RIGHT NOW..... I admitted they've been playing like crap. I'm saying this COULD be a formidable team if a couple players decide to stop playing like absolute dog sh*t. If Byfield decides he wants to show up. If Danault and Moore decide they want to start playing. If Fiala starts playing like we know he can. Obviously yeah maybe those guys won't turn it around and are just having bad years but we know these guys are pretty damn good hockey players - they can and should be much better - if they are, the Kings will be much better off as an extension.

With Doughty back (assuming he'll be back at some point this season based on what we've heard from the Kings), the Kings' defense is instantly pretty damn good especially with Clarke playing like he's been playing. If Byfield and/or a couple other top 6 forwards pull their heads out of their asses and start playing good hockey, that instantly makes this teams' forward group pretty damn good. The goaltending is suspect but we'll see how that goes.

ALL I'M SAYING, is that we've basically seen the worst from this team and they're still 2nd in the division 10 games in. I understand it hasn't been pretty.... But if anything that's more of a reason to be optimistic IMO. Because we know many of these Kings players who are struggling right now are capable of playing MUCH better. And if they do start playing much better, this Kings team starts to look completely different than it does right now. You might feel differently - that's fine. I'm not saying their definitely a contender - I'm just saying this group has a lot more potential than they've shown so far. Mostly because the vets haven't been pulling their weight.
None of what you mentioned addresses the huge problem with this team, the complete and total lack of anything resembling a star player, much less the multiple star players that championship teams have. Last years champion had 3-4 players better than anybody on the Kings.

Clarke has star potential, but due to laughably bad development decisions he only has a limited amount of NHL games, instead of 1-2 seasons worth. Had he been handled by the Kings like he would have been by any other team in the NHL he could be more impactful, but he's probably 1-2 years away from really hitting his peak as a poor man's Karlsson.

Saying someone was a bad pick does not mean one is a bust. Saying Turcotte was not Jonathan Toews does not mean he is a bust. I've been saying for 5 years now that he was going to be another Andrew Copp, sure seems like that was a correct prediction? Andrew Copp can contribute as a good depth piece on a contending team, but he ain't making a middle of the pack team into a contender.

Laff has been awesome, isn't it amazing what happens in situations where the Kings are hands-off with prospect development. You have middle round picks who are kept away from Nelly and Muzz almost immediately stepping into NHL roles out of college (Laff, Faber, Anderson). While the ones that they get as teenagers (Byfield, Turcotte, Kaliyev, Bjornfot, Kupari, Kaliyev) fail to live up to where they were originally projected. Funny how that works out.

But those three aren't changing playoff results from last year without the addition of 1-2 star players, that is what the Kings are missing from contending.

And also, you are mentioning the improvement of certain players but conveniently ignore others that are inevitably going to decline, you mention Danault, he's almost 32 with a ton of miles on his body, it's way more likely this is who he is, he declined each of the past two seasons, why do you think it's not going to continue this season? Doughty is 35 years old and coming off another major injury. Kopitar is 37. These guys are not as good as they were in the previous years. You can't cherry pick natural age progression and ignore age regression. The regression of your 1C, 2C and 1D more than makes up for any progression from the players above. The Kings are probably on the same level in 2025 as they were in the previous 3 years. This is what black hole teams do.

I don’t think we’ve seen the worst of this team yet. They aren’t playing uniquely or unusually below their standards or anything, this is just who they have been since January of this calendar year. They win ugly against the bad teams and they lose ugly against the good teams, with a handful of outliers like last night sprinkled in.

As for the roster’s supposed potential, there are like 25 teams that could make a miracle Cup run if every player magically played the best hockey of his career at the same time for a two month stretch. I don’t doubt that what you’re saying is exactly what the front office is thinking because hope really is a strategy for them though.

2012 was incredible, but people have to realize it was a once in a lifetime run. But you have the President of the team still referencing it 13 years later to justify the current black hole team being a contender.

"Look at 2012, you just have to get in, anything can happen"

Just conveniently forgetting that the 2012 Kings had three Hall of Fame players in their primes, at the three most important positions on an NHL roster.
 

KopitarGOAT420

Registered User
Jan 30, 2020
560
839
USA
TBH - it all comes down to Byfield. There's other players that need to be better but the Kings desperately need him to be a star to have a chance of being a top 10 team this year. And I say that as a huge Byfield fan/believer.

Going into this season, myself and many others said this Kings team would go as far as Byfield would take them. So far, that's really not looking great. And as a result the Kings aren't looking great either.

If Byfield continues to struggle, yeah this team is going to be mid and that's super disappointing. If he can turn it around and start to look like the player we saw in preseason, this team starts to look really dangerous.

Byfield looked like a sure-fire PPG player in preseason. Let's just assume hypothetically, that he continued that great play into the regular season and was sitting at ~10 points right now. He'd probably be playing 1C already if that was the case based on how Kopi has looked (admittedly cold/not amazing at times) and how Danault has struggled.

Byfield being the 1C we need him to be would completely change the outlook of this Kings team. They could ice a lineup like this - and have star power at the top of the lineup and great depth throughout:
Fiala - Byfield - Kempe
Moore - Kopitar - Foegele
Turcotte - Danault - Laferriere
Lee - Thomas (Lewis) - Jeannot

Anderson - Clarke
Gavrikov - Spence
Edmundson - Burroughs

The defense is still questionable - but actually becomes really really solid once Doughty returns.

THAT'S the kind of lineup the Kings need to have to be formidable. That lineup, assuming players are pulling their weight and playing to their potential, would be very very solid. Byfield needs to turn it around ASAP. If he doesn't. the Kings should sell off a few players and treat this as a building year for next year.

None of what you mentioned addresses the huge problem with this team, the complete and total lack of anything resembling a star player, much less the multiple star players that championship teams have. Last years champion had 3-4 players better than anybody on the Kings.

Clarke has star potential, but due to laughably bad development decisions he only has a limited amount of NHL games, instead of 1-2 seasons worth. Had he been handled by the Kings like he would have been by any other team in the NHL he could be more impactful, but he's probably 1-2 years away from really hitting his peak as a poor man's Karlsson.

Saying someone was a bad pick does not mean one is a bust. Saying Turcotte was not Jonathan Toews does not mean he is a bust. I've been saying for 5 years now that he was going to be another Andrew Copp, sure seems like that was a correct prediction? Andrew Copp can contribute as a good depth piece on a contending team, but he ain't making a middle of the pack team into a contender.

Laff has been awesome, isn't it amazing what happens in situations where the Kings are hands-off with prospect development. You have middle round picks who are kept away from Nelly and Muzz almost immediately stepping into NHL roles out of college (Laff, Faber, Anderson). While the ones that they get as teenagers (Byfield, Turcotte, Kaliyev, Bjornfot, Kupari, Kaliyev) fail to live up to where they were originally projected. Funny how that works out.

But those three aren't changing playoff results from last year without the addition of 1-2 star players, that is what the Kings are missing from contending.

And also, you are mentioning the improvement of certain players but conveniently ignore others that are inevitably going to decline, you mention Danault, he's almost 32 with a ton of miles on his body, it's way more likely this is who he is, he declined each of the past two seasons, why do you think it's not going to continue this season? Doughty is 35 years old and coming off another major injury. Kopitar is 37. These guys are not as good as they were in the previous years. You can't cherry pick natural age progression and ignore age regression. The regression of your 1C, 2C and 1D more than makes up for any progression from the players above. The Kings are probably on the same level in 2025 as they were in the previous 3 years. This is what black hole teams do.



2012 was incredible, but people have to realize it was a once in a lifetime run. But you have the President of the team still referencing it 13 years later to justify the current black hole team being a contender.

"Look at 2012, you just have to get in, anything can happen"

Just conveniently forgetting that the 2012 Kings had three Hall of Fame players in their primes, at the three most important positions on an NHL roster.
Yes..... I've said many times the Kings need Clarke and Byfield to be stars to have a chance. Clarke doesn't necessarily need to be a star this year, just needs to contribute like he's been doing. Byfield on the other hand, really needs to step it up.

If Byfield isn't a star, I agree this team is screwed. I still have hope that he'll turn it around / figure it out.
 

Sol

Smile
Jun 30, 2017
24,313
20,406
This is why it's critical to have a management group in place that can sell players on the their vision for the team.

In pro sports you are never going to have ALL the best players, and to win you don't even need any of the best players.

But you do need to be able to identify the right players and sell them on the path the team is on.

That in the end, is the ultimate failure of Blake and Luc's time running the Kings.

It isn't the players, the coaches, the prospects, or anyone else to blame. It's those two having no real vision or plan in place that is the issue with this and every Kings team since 2018.
That’s why I will say that Kopitar and Doughty are the primary reason for the Kings greatest successes and are also the reason for the Kings greatest failures. We’ve been a bad team for many years now and for some reason Kopitar/Doughty have not been moved despite the Kings not being able to be viable for many years now.

We can speculate that Kopitar is a good old boy who puts his head down and does what he’s told or we can also speculate that this guy re-signed with the Kings while they suck for some big money. You can easily speculate that both Kopitar and Doughty have a massive say in their deployment which makes their ego hurt younger players like Byfield.

We can only speculate but those two had to have been gone with Sutter.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SaltyElkHunter

KopitarGOAT420

Registered User
Jan 30, 2020
560
839
USA
I don’t think we’ve seen the worst of this team yet. They aren’t playing uniquely or unusually below their standards or anything, this is just who they have been since January of this calendar year. They win ugly against the bad teams and they lose ugly against the good teams, with a handful of outliers like last night sprinkled in.

As for the roster’s supposed potential, there are like 25 teams that could make a miracle Cup run if every player magically played the best hockey of his career at the same time for a two month stretch. I don’t doubt that what you’re saying is exactly what the front office is thinking because hope really is a strategy for them though.
I meannnnnnnnn.... They're getting nearly 0 contributions from 3 out of their 4 forwards lines. And more than that, a handful of their best players have been outright bad. That's unusually bad in my eyes.

Also, just to be clear I'm not just blindly hoping everyone turns it around and catches fire and everything ends up being a perfect little miracle run. I'm just acknowledging that what we're seeing now from the Kings isn't anywhere near their best hockey and they have like 5-6 players who usually play MUCH better hockey - and a few of those guys likely won't be playing terrible hockey forever. I'm also acknowledging that if this team doesn't turn it around they will definitely be mid and that's definitely terrible for the franchise and they should definitely sell players and re-tool / treat this year as a building year to get young players experience but likely won't do that given the current management/coaching group.

Basically all I'm saying is this team has a lot more potential than we've seen and we should give it another 10 games to see if some of these guys start to figure it out and if the team starts to gel and for some reason everyone feels the need to respond with "What???? You think this team has potential??? How can you POSSIBLY think that?????? They have NOTHING AND WILL NEVER HAVE ANYTHING!!!!!"

Like just relax guys. What harm does it do to give this team another 10-15 more games to see if they can figure it out?? Currently, we have to hope for 1 of 2 outcomes. Either the Kings turn it around and a guy like Byfield starts to play like a star and the Kings start to look like they have the potential to make some noise in the playoffs (not just make the playoffs) or the Kings completely fall apart to the point where we get a top 10 pick and new management/coaching. I'm choosing to hope for the 1st outcome because it's more fun and gives us a chance to win. I understand I may be 'wrong'. I understand I may be 'disappointed'. And I'm okay with that. Personally, I'd rather be wrong and disappointed than spend my time sitting around hoping my team does poorly. Now I understand some of you have been fans for 30-40+ years and that's weighed on you over the years and you're fed up. That's fine and to an extent I definitely get it. To an extent, I'm fed up too. But maybe don't ruin it for other people that maybe do still want to have faith/hope in their team???
 
  • Like
Reactions: SaltyElkHunter

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad