Speculation: 2024-25 Roster thread

Rybread86

To the DOME
Mar 24, 2022
2,186
2,760
OC
He’s got a 4-team trade list in his contract. Not like you can just move him wherever he’s wanted.

And it was just recently it was even mentioned that he was willing to consider more than 4 teams, but its all still in his control.

At this point in his career, hes not going to accept a trade to just anywhere. Hes going to want to go to a team that has a legit chance to win. Thats not going to make it easy to get a deal done.
 

CrazyDuck4u

Registered User
Oct 14, 2006
6,937
3,990
And it was just recently it was even mentioned that he was willing to consider more than 4 teams, but its all still in his control.

At this point in his career, hes not going to accept a trade to just anywhere. Hes going to want to go to a team that has a legit chance to win. Thats not going to make it easy to get a deal done.
I would trade fowler to the Kings.. He stays in LA. They need D bad.. Yes he's no Doughty but he can help them. Ducks can retain alittle if it helps the kings.
 

Rybread86

To the DOME
Mar 24, 2022
2,186
2,760
OC
I would trade fowler to the Kings.. He stays in LA. They need D bad.. Yes he's no Doughty but he can help them. Ducks can retain alittle if it helps the kings.

That is an interesting one. Trade in division, to a team we dont deal with very often.

There is a need. He wouldnt have to move his family.
 

Zegs2sendhelp

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jul 25, 2012
42,386
39,196
He almost scored 50 points 2 seasons ago and has averaged 44 points over the last 3 seasons on the worst offense in the league.

I get some of you guys hate him, but at worst he is overpayed by 1 mil. He is probably closer to market value at the moment.
It’s more of the combination of
A) they want him
B) they have cap for him
C) he’ll waive for said team
D)can offer us whatever it is we want to return for fowler

Personally idk that I see a lot of holes on the roster right now that can be addressed via a fowler trade so futures prob makes the most sense
 

tomd

Registered User
Apr 23, 2003
10,048
5,955
Visit site
I don’t see where Fowler would fit into the LA lineup at this point. They already have Anderson-Gavrikov-Edmundson on the left side.
 

Rybread86

To the DOME
Mar 24, 2022
2,186
2,760
OC
Seems like wishful thinking in your part but you’re entitled to it.

Im not advocating for Fowler to be traded there, just saying it could be an option. I would prefer any/all our lifelong guys never goto LA.

I dont think LA would jump on it right now anyways. I think they get the season started and see how well they can cover down on Doughtys absence before looking at trades.

But, if they start to slip in the standings and have a big hole on the blueline, it could be an option for them. Question is if its an option for us or Fowler.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tomd

Rybread86

To the DOME
Mar 24, 2022
2,186
2,760
OC
Personally idk that I see a lot of holes on the roster right now that can be addressed via a fowler trade so futures prob makes the most sense

I was thinking about that last night watching the game. D seems like we can have Zell and Luneau playing every night, in which case, we probably dont need a direct Fowler replacement there. Im still concerned with the minutes Fowler was eating being dished out to rookies but if its evenly spreadout, you may be ok.

Forwards, I dont see many holes right now. We're really just waiting on the youth to take that next step but you arent really looking to replace any of them, they need to play. And we have a few guys who will start in SD that can be brought up for 4th line roles too.

Goalies are pretty well set. Gibson being out might hurt, but Dostal can carry the load. You may want a better backup for the short term, but not necessarily what your looking for in a Fowler return.

You are most likely targeting futures.
 

Zegs2sendhelp

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jul 25, 2012
42,386
39,196
I was thinking about that last night watching the game. D seems like we can have Zell and Luneau playing every night, in which case, we probably dont need a direct Fowler replacement there. Im still concerned with the minutes Fowler was eating being dished out to rookies but if its evenly spreadout, you may be ok.

Forwards, I dont see many holes right now. We're really just waiting on the youth to take that next step but you arent really looking to replace any of them, they need to play. And we have a few guys who will start in SD that can be brought up for 4th line roles too.

Goalies are pretty well set. Gibson being out might hurt, but Dostal can carry the load. You may want a better backup for the short term, but not necessarily what your looking for in a Fowler return.

You are most likely targeting futures.
The holes I do see… would require making more moves.

Could we have a better 3c than strome, Possibly but if we add that player then we’re looking to trade strome, or move him down the line up… which the kicks others out of the line up.

Right now I think you let the young guys continue to develop…. And have guys like gudas dumolin fabbri killorn Vatrano and strome kinda assist them as vets.

I think getting futures allows us to make trades to address needs later on when we are more confident those moves are what we need to take a next step
 

robbieboy3686

Registered User
Jan 17, 2016
3,186
2,159
He almost scored 50 points 2 seasons ago and has averaged 44 points over the last 3 seasons on the worst offense in the league.

I get some of you guys hate him, but at worst he is overpayed by 1 mil. He is probably closer to market value at the moment.
I don’t think our GM will be to greedy with finding the perfect deal for cam. My guess, we all will be ok with what we get for cam, and hope he thrives in a more ready to win now team. He gets dealt sooner than later
 

Rybread86

To the DOME
Mar 24, 2022
2,186
2,760
OC
The holes I do see… would require making more moves.

Could we have a better 3c than strome, Possibly but if we add that player then we’re looking to trade strome, or move him down the line up… which the kicks others out of the line up.

Right now I think you let the young guys continue to develop…. And have guys like gudas dumolin fabbri killorn Vatrano and strome kinda assist them as vets.

I think getting futures allows us to make trades to address needs later on when we are more confident those moves are what we need to take a next step

3c all depends on how sold they are at keeping Zegras at wing. You could move Strome to wing and be fine.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ohcomeonref

cheesymc

Registered User
Feb 28, 2002
4,152
1,850
Irvine
Visit site
Would John Ludvig be an upgrade over someone like Vaak? He just got waived by the Penguins. Too bad he isn't a righty... I'd prefer to give him a chance over Linstrom and Pysyk.
 

MMC

Global Moderator
May 11, 2014
51,071
43,050
Orange County, CA
I think we ultimately go 14F/7D. I think the default roster is the following:

Gauthier-Carlsson-Killorn
Zegras-McTavish-Terry
Vatrano-Strome-Fabbri
McGinn-Lundestrom-Leason
Johnston
Harkins

Fowler-Zellweger
Mintyukov-Gudas
Dumoulin-LaCombe
Vaakanainen

Dostal
Dansk

I’m pretty certain this is what we end up going with. The question is just if any of Sennecke, Gaucher, Colangelo, Nesterenko, Pysyk, Lindstrom, Luneau, or Clang can force someone out and I’m just not sure I’ve seen that so far. Maybe Pysyk or Lindstrom get a two way deal
Harkins getting waived today puts an interesting wrench into things and means one of the following things is happening (unless we make some other add)

1. One of the young forwards (Sennecke, Gaucher, Nesterenko, or Colangelo) is making the team

2. Both Luneau and Zellweger are making the team

3. One of Pysyk or Lindstrom made the team
 
  • Like
Reactions: Zegs2sendhelp

robbieboy3686

Registered User
Jan 17, 2016
3,186
2,159
Harkins getting waived today puts an interesting wrench into things and means one of the following things is happening (unless we make some other add)

1. One of the young forwards (Sennecke, Gaucher, Nesterenko, or Colangelo) is making the team

2. Both Luneau and Zellweger are making the team

3. One of Pysyk or Lindstrom made the team
I’m guessing #1
 

Deuce22

Registered User
Jun 17, 2013
5,879
8,253
SoCal & Idaho
This could come down to Luneau on his natural side being preferable to Zellweger on his off side. Since a lot of Zellweger's value comes on the PP, perhaps Ducks having other options (Luneau, Mintyukov, LaCombe, Fowler) lessens his value.
 
  • Like
Reactions: robbieboy3686

DavidBL

Registered User
Jul 25, 2012
6,212
4,228
Orange, CA
Harkins getting waived today puts an interesting wrench into things and means one of the following things is happening (unless we make some other add)

1. One of the young forwards (Sennecke, Gaucher, Nesterenko, or Colangelo) is making the team

2. Both Luneau and Zellweger are making the team

3. One of Pysyk or Lindstrom made the team
I'd also add
4. They're trying to sneak him through waivers now when he's less likely to be claimed.
My bet would be Senneke getting his 9 games then sent back to Jr then Harkins called back up.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ducks DVM

Rybread86

To the DOME
Mar 24, 2022
2,186
2,760
OC
I'd also add
4. They're trying to sneak him through waivers now when he's less likely to be claimed.
My bet would be Senneke getting his 9 games then sent back to Jr then Harkins called back up.

I dont see Sennecke staying for 9 games. I think they keep him up as long as they can to work with him but gets sent down before the season starts. Physically hes just not there.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MD93 and Kalv

Ducks DVM

sowcufucakky
Jun 6, 2010
53,805
32,447
Long Beach, CA
I'd also add
4. They're trying to sneak him through waivers now when he's less likely to be claimed.
My bet would be Senneke getting his 9 games then sent back to Jr then Harkins called back up.
This. Going through waivers =/= being sent down.

He may well be sent down, but this isn’t a guarantee he will be right now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kalv and 2faded

91Fedorov

John (Gibson) 3:16
Dec 30, 2013
1,410
1,094
Harkins getting waived today puts an interesting wrench into things and means one of the following things is happening (unless we make some other add)

1. One of the young forwards (Sennecke, Gaucher, Nesterenko, or Colangelo) is making the team

2. Both Luneau and Zellweger are making the team

3. One of Pysyk or Lindstrom made the team
I'm guessing #3. I think Pysyk has the best case for our #7 D. Possibly Vaaks and Pysyk as a 7 and 8th D. Our D always gets wrecked with injuries.
 

duckpuck

Registered User
Sponsor
Jul 10, 2007
2,581
2,707
He almost scored 50 points 2 seasons ago and has averaged 44 points over the last 3 seasons on the worst offense in the league.

I get some of you guys hate him, but at worst he is overpayed by 1 mil. He is probably closer to market value at the moment.

Fower is not overpaid. he's a top 4 D-man. $6.5M is the going rate for that type of player. And when you consider he only has two years of term left (as opposed to signing a 29-30 year old UFA to a longer term deal), that adds additional value for a contender.
 

Zegs2sendhelp

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jul 25, 2012
42,386
39,196
Fower is not overpaid. he's a top 4 D-man. $6.5M is the going rate for that type of player. And when you consider he only has two years of term left (as opposed to signing a 29-30 year old UFA to a longer term deal), that adds additional value for a contender.
Contenders dont generally have cap space to play with.... so 6.5 for 2 years is kinda a lot for a contender to try and take on.

Add that to his NTC, and LHD not exactly being the hardest position to fill.... i imagine the value we get on fowler wont be very great.

Personally im hoping for a 1st + 2nd value, but i doubt he gets that much.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad