2024-25 Roster Thread #2: Midseasonnar

  • Work is still on-going to rebuild the site styling and features. Please report any issues you may experience so we can look into it. Click Here for Updates

Not sure if this should be posted in this thread or if it's already been posted to another. The gist of the article is trade deadline decisions should be based on 'loyalty" and not necessarily getting a "huge return".
So.... we go down the same path they've been on for how long now?

Who wants to kiss the ring?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Flyerfan4life
  • Haha
Reactions: bennysflyers16

Not sure if this should be posted in this thread or if it's already been posted to another. The gist of the article is trade deadline decisions should be based on 'loyalty" and not necessarily getting a "huge return".
The source is Frank Seravalli. Take if for what it's worth.

Loyalty and "buy-in" are very different things.
What good team adds players who won't play their style of hockey?
 
  • Haha
Reactions: dragonoffrost

Not sure if this should be posted in this thread or if it's already been posted to another. The gist of the article is trade deadline decisions should be based on 'loyalty" and not necessarily getting a "huge return".
Did Jonesy ghost write this article?
 
  • Haha
Reactions: bennysflyers16
The source is Frank Seravalli. Take if for what it's worth.

Loyalty and "buy-in" are very different things.
What good team adds players who won't play their style of hockey?
Not really. It talks about who wants to be here and who wants to buy in to the Flyers way. What good team bases their player moves on that. Rather than the quality of play, position need and fit and of course. Talent. Flyers have to Flyer. If the Flyers players were smart, they wouldn't want to play the Flyers current style of hockey.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rebels57
The source is Frank Seravalli. Take if for what it's worth.

Loyalty and "buy-in" are very different things.
What good team adds players who won't play their style of hockey?
You mean respected reporter and former Flyers insider Frank Seravalli? What exactly is our take away supposed to be that he's the one reporting this?
 
I am begging people to stop reading aggregation sites. This is what Seravalli wrote:

Top Objective: Find out who wants to be a Flyer

Scoop: Part of what made Saturday’s clash with Cutter Gauthier must-watch was the pride the Flyers’ roster showed for the organization, clearly taking it personally. That’s the next step at this deadline for GM Danny Briere. Who wants to be part of it moving forward? It’s fair to ask some serious questions about the group, including Joel Farabee, Morgan Frost, Bobby Brink and others.

It's awful, but it's not as bad as the aggregator made it sound. It's generic hockey-plated claptrap. They're as gotten to as it gets. We already knew that. Well, ok. Most of us did.
 
Not really. It talks about who wants to be here and who wants to buy in to the Flyers way. What good team bases their player moves on that. Rather than the quality of play, position need and fit and of course. Talent. Flyers have to Flyer. If the Flyers players were smart, they wouldn't want to play the Flyers current style of hockey.

No good organization wants their players to buy-in to the Flyers way.
 
"Death or Glory" is an absolute favorite song of hers
I introduced my son to all my music. First song he learned on his guitar was Should I Stay. Came home last year to the blasting riffs of Holidays in the Sun! I bought him London Calling for his 12th birthday and loved explaining the lyrics to him, esp. "He who f*cks nuns will later join the Church." LOL!
 
  • Like
Reactions: FlyerNutter
It's BS. No quote from anyone, even an anonymous source.
Gauthier was an unusual situation, and the frustration was as much not being able to negotiate a solution as pique b/c he didn't want to be a "Flyer."
To project from that is a stretch.

Any good FO looks for players who are good fits for organizational philosophy before committing to them for the long-term. You want your core players to be on the same page, b/c these are your big minute guys. You can work around "specialists," guys with useful skills who need to be sheltered. But you don't commit term and big money to these guys.
Toughness matters. Two things about Michkov:
1) he's competitive and nasty, numerous teams have run at him and he won't back down
2) his teammates have immediately responded when he's been run at, and he knows they have his back

Forget fighting and that crap, it's about "I won't back down", refuse to be intimidated and don't watch passively when a teammate is the target of a cheap shot.

I think that's the sort of thing Briere calls "being a Flyer", not size, but snarl - TK has always been that kind of player. Briere played at a time when a small guy would be constantly hooked, slashed, elbowed, etc., and you had to play through it. He probably sees toughness differently than say Jones.
 
I am begging people to stop reading aggregation sites. This is what Seravalli wrote:



It's awful, but it's not as bad as the aggregator made it sound. It's generic hockey-plated claptrap. They're as gotten to as it gets. We already knew that. Well, ok. Most of us did.
What did Brink do wrong to get on this list? Christ's sake.
 

Not sure if this should be posted in this thread or if it's already been posted to another. The gist of the article is trade deadline decisions should be based on 'loyalty" and not necessarily getting a "huge return".

I mean, that article didn't make a whole lot of sense.
 

Ad

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad