Boston Bruins 2024-25 Roster and Salary Cap Discussion

Status
Not open for further replies.

JoeIsAStud

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Feb 27, 2002
11,970
6,149
Visit site
Most likely he will look for a home-run. And he will likely find it. 4-5 year contract. I'd be OK 1-2 (not saying for the Bruins just in general).

It's like Elias Lindholm. A 4-5 year deal. I don't love it but I can live with it. Honestly if his agent called and drew a hard line in the sand at 7 years, I'd probably hang up the phone on him.

Yeah I get it, at least Lindholm has a history of being an absolute workhorse who is on the ice almost every night for the last decade
 

Bruinfanatic

Registered User
Apr 22, 2016
13,357
10,142
Ontario
Frank Seravalli's projected UFA contract amounts. I disagree with quite a few but wanted to put it here as some sort of reference for what player may be expecting to get paid. I think he is low pretty much across the board. The Bruins should have 22M in cap space before dealing Ullmark and signing Swayman. I am basing this on a 88m cap. Ullmark dealt for picks and Swayman at 8m the Bruins should have 19m to sign players. I bolded names I think would fit with that money available.
Not listed is Brandon Duhaime who I would also sign. Underlined players would be secondary choices
RankPlayerPosAgeTeamCap HitGPGPTSAFP Proj*
1Sam ReinhartRW29FLA$6.5M8257948 x $10.2M
2Jake GuentzelLW30CAR$6M6730776 x $8M
3Steven StamkosLW/C34TBL$8.5M7940813 x $6.3M
4Patrick KaneRW36DET$2.75M5020472 x $5.5M
5Joe PavelskiRW40DAL$5.5M8227671 x $4M
6Brady SkjeiLD30CAR$5.25M8013476 x $7.4M
7Jonathan MarchessaultRW34VGK$5M8242693 x $6.25M
8Elias LindholmC/RW30VAN$4.85M7515447 x $8M
9Brandon MontourRD30FLA$3.5M668337 x $8.7M
10Matt DucheneC/RW33DAL$3M8025653 x $6.5M
11Matt RoyRD29LAK$3.15M815254 x $5.5M
12Brett PesceRD30CAR$4.03M703136 x $6.7M
13Teuvo TeravainenLW30CAR$5.4M7625535 x $6.3M
14Tyler BertuzziLW29TOR$5.5M8021435 x $6M
15Nikita ZadorovLD29VAN$3.75M756204 x $5M
16Chandler StevensonC30VGK$2.75M7516515 x $5.7M
17Tyler ToffoliRW32WPG$4.25M7933555 x $6.5M
18Jonathan DrouinLW29COL$825K7919564 X $4.5M
19Max DomiRW29TOR$3M809473 x $4.2M
20Sean WalkerRD30COL$2.65M8110294 x $4.8M
21Oliver Ekman-LarssonLD33FLA$2.25M809323 x $3.7M
22Dakota JoshuaLW28VAN$825K6318323 x $3M
23Vladimir TarasenkoRW33FLA$5M7623553 x $5.6M
24Jalen ChatfieldRD28CAR$763K728223 x $2.7M
25Jake DeBruskLW28BOS$4M8019405 x $6M
26Alexandre CarrierRD30NSH$2.5M734203 x $2.7M
27Shayne GostisbehereLD31DET$4.13M8110563 x $4.4M
28Sean MonahanC30WPG$2M8326593 x $2.9M
29Anthony DuclairLW29TBL$3M7324423 x $3.25M
30Yakov TreninLW/C28COL$1.7M7612173 x $3.3M
31Alex NedeljkovicG29PIT$1.5M382.960.9022 x $2M
32David PerronRW36DET$4.75M7617472 x 2.8M
33Viktor ArvidssonRW31LAK$4.25M18615n/a
34Brenden DillonLD34WPG$3.9M778202 x $3.9M
35Ian ColeLD35VAN$3M782112 x $3M
36Tyler MyersRD34VAN$6M775292 x 2.7M
37Jason ZuckerLW32NSH$5.3M6914323 x $5.4M
38Matt DumbaRD30TBL$3.9M764123 x $3.7M
39Alex WennbergC30NYR$4.5M7910304 x $4.2M
40Dylan DeMeloRD31WPG$3M823314 x $5M
41Matt GrzelcykLD31BOS$3.7M632113 x $4M
42Chris TanevRD35DAL$4.5M752193 x $4.7M
43Erik GustafssonLD32NYR$825K766313 x $5M
44Daniel SprongRW27DET$2M7618433 x $3.8M
45Kaapo KahkonenG28NJD$2.75M373.640.8982 x $3M
46Teddy BluegerC30VAN$1.9M686282 x $2.6M
47Jordan MartinookLW32CAR$1.8M8214322 x $2.8M
48Ilya SamsonovG27TOR$3.55M403.130.892 x $3.25M
49T.J. BrodieLD34TOR$5M781263 x $4.8M
50Vincent DesharnaisRD28EDM$763K781112 x $1.4M
So does the 19 million also have to include resigning DeBrusk or a replacement
 

BruinDust

Registered User
Aug 2, 2005
24,651
22,482
Yeah I get it, at least Lindholm has a history of being an absolute workhorse who is on the ice almost every night for the last decade

I'm not totally against a Lindholm signing (I expect them to go after him hard), but the term and AAV need to be right. I like his durability as you point out.
 

Patdud

Registered User
Mar 23, 2022
1,763
2,557
New Hampshire
I'm not totally against a Lindholm signing (I expect them to go after him hard), but the term and AAV need to be right. I like his durability as you point out.
Hes the better bergeron successor at least being a killer 2 way forward who wins faceoffs and plays the bumper. Bruins need a center who can play on a 1st line and win matchups. Coyle has brought it this year but he caps at 2, not fair to him to rate him against something he isnt capable or paid to do (be a 1st line forward).


Zacha isnt a Center in the NHL, to be frank, hes barely playing like a third line wing these playoffs and thats a red flag. use him in a trade and clear space. Let DeBrusk walk and get a big time LW and Lindholm at center. the Defense is set and the net is Swayman's, Ullmark and Zacha are your trade bait.
 

BruinDust

Registered User
Aug 2, 2005
24,651
22,482
Hes the better bergeron successor at least being a killer 2 way forward who wins faceoffs and plays the bumper. Bruins need a center who can play on a 1st line and win matchups. Coyle has brought it this year but he caps at 2, not fair to him to rate him against something he isnt capable or paid to do (be a 1st line forward).


Zacha isnt a Center in the NHL, to be frank, hes barely playing like a third line wing these playoffs and thats a red flag. use him in a trade and clear space. Let DeBrusk walk and get a big time LW and Lindholm at center. the Defense is set and the net is Swayman's, Ullmark and Zacha are your trade bait.

Losing that option in the bumper destroyed their PP this year, became far too predictable. The bumper opens up passing lanes east-west for the main weapon, Pasta's one-timer.

I'm find moving Zacha as long as they have something else to use his cap space on.

Debrusk I'm 50/50. He brings elements I want more of (speed, shooting). This forward group is slow enough now as it is.
 
  • Like
Reactions: zaYG

DKH

The Bergeron of HF
Feb 27, 2002
74,624
53,214
Bruins should inquire about Lundell if they sign Reinhart

Montour likely going to FA so maybe they can squeeze him in but Forsling just signed 8 years for around 6 M not sure how it works looking over
 
  • Like
Reactions: bbfan419

ON3M4N

Ignores/60 = Elite
Dec 13, 2015
13,137
18,171
Connecticut
I’m jealous.

You shouldn't be. Florida going into next season has $19 million in cap space with 14 guys under contract and the following guys needs deals:

Reinhart
Okposo
Tarasenko
Cousins
Lorentz
Stenlund
Lomberg
Montour
OEL
Kulikov
Mahura

Next year they have Bennet, Verhaeghe & Ekblad who needs deals. They're window is this year and maybe next year. After that they're going to take a step back. They also have no 1st rounder the next two years and their prospect pool is ok, but nothing great.
 

DKH

The Bergeron of HF
Feb 27, 2002
74,624
53,214
Losing that option in the bumper destroyed their PP this year, became far too predictable. The bumper opens up passing lanes east-west for the main weapon, Pasta's one-timer.

I'm find moving Zacha as long as they have something else to use his cap space on.

Debrusk I'm 50/50. He brings elements I want more of (speed, shooting). This forward group is slow enough now as it is.
DeBrusk should be with Pastrnak

Pasta wants to play with him - took way to long to get here

You shouldn't be. Florida going into next season has $19 million in cap space with 14 guys under contract and the following guys needs deals:

Reinhart
Okposo
Tarasenko
Cousins
Lorentz
Stenlund
Lomberg
Montour
OEL
Kulikov
Mahura

Next year they have Bennet, Verhaeghe & Ekblad who needs deals. They're window is this year and maybe next year. After that they're going to take a step back. They also have no 1st rounder the next two years and their prospect pool is ok, but nothing great.
There f***ed

I want Lundell

Doubtful they move him but he’s a RFA and I’m him even a bridge I want 5 M up from 925 K
 

Hookslide

Registered User
Nov 19, 2018
4,205
3,505
You are also looking at probably a 3-4 million difference in their AAVs. Maybe more. Reinhart had more goals this year than Lindholm had points. He almost had as many goals (57) as Lindholm had points the year prior (64).

You might be looking at 10-11 million per to pry Reinhart out of South Florida and it's no-state tax situation.
Forget about it.
 
Feb 25, 2016
526
335
Most opinions are trying to improve the Bruins by addition and subtraction, looking to resemble a realistic chance at a cup.

I don't share that opinion. Looking at how they squeaked by in the 1st round and the total domination by the Panthers in the 2nd round the Bruins need a full blowup from management to the team.

That said, no matter the heartstrings they may pull on, every player should be assessed based on value and performance. Value as to marketable assets and performances in the playoffs. The Panthers barely made the playoffs last year and went to the Stanley Cup finals, precisely because of their talent depts.

If the blowup choice is made every player must be on the block. It makes no sense to pay wheel barrels of cash for 2-4 seasons and play at the league's bottom. If a blowup choice isn't made, the fans should expect another 10-20 years as the ugly bridemaid who catches the bouquet only to turn around and see a room emptied of men.
 

zaYG

Nerevarine
Jun 29, 2012
3,540
901
Santa Cruz, CA
Slept on it and I’m coming around on Lindholm although he scares me as potentially being a dud signing. I think he just fits a need if he lives up to his contract but that’s a big if. If you sign him I think you need to move forward with trading Zacha.

I also fully want them to sign Debrusk. The worry is that he’ll ask for too much and get it. He shouldn’t be paid like a great offensive player. There’s no more potential there. He is what he is. However, his defensive play, general energy, and willingness to be the only skater showing up every game in these playoffs makes him a keeper.
 

JoeIsAStud

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Feb 27, 2002
11,970
6,149
Visit site
I'm not sure moving Zacha is the play for this group.

Cheap contract given what he brings. 57, and 59 points in two years with BOS making 4.75m? That's solid ROI in a cap league.

Absolutely should not be playing C next year.

I agree. I am not opposed to moving Zacha if necessary in a deal where a better player comes back. But I wouldn't move him for picks (you aren't getting a better player in FA for the same price, you aren't getting a top 6 guy for close to that price)

Replacement

good luck finding a players as good or better for a similar price in FA. Sure you can spend millions more per year and go get Reinhart or Guentzel, but those will both likely cost 60% more than DeBrusk will. And of course Jake is again one of the guys who has shown up in the postseason.

The Bruins have a lot of cash, but that goes away very quickly if you are lucky enough to get one of the top 3-4 guys on the market.

Once you get down the the Debrusk price range you are talking about similarly flawed players. Maybe some are more consistent offensively, but have big gaps in their defensive game.
 

Absurdity

light switch connoisseur
Jul 6, 2012
10,990
7,231
I'm not sure moving Zacha is the play for this group.

Cheap contract given what he brings. 57, and 59 points in two years with BOS making 4.75m? That's solid ROI in a cap league.

Absolutely should not be playing C next year.
He can score points during the regular season all he wants. His actions speak louder than his words this playoff run, and he has been a complete dud.
 

JRull86

Registered User
Jan 28, 2009
27,582
15,414
South Shore
He can score points during the regular season all he wants. His actions speak louder than his words this playoff run, and he has been a complete dud.
Sure he's been poor, I don't think anyone will dispute that. But find me a guy whose going to give you 50+ points for what he makes as a FA. You probably aren't.

He's not someone I'm looking to deal just to deal.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CDJ

Shaun

Registered User
Oct 12, 2010
25,175
3,048
i see zacha as debrusk's replacement on LW once edmonton overpays him
 

kdog82

Registered User
Oct 6, 2002
2,821
1,449
Toronto
Visit site
Watching the Canucks in the playoffs. E. Lindholm fits this Bruins team like a glove. Its a no brainer imo.

We knew the Bruins weaknesses heading into the post season and is now more clear than ever. This team needs to upgrade the C position immediately. In a perfect world I would go after both Lindholm and Stephenson. Move Poitras to RW for now or send him to Providence to get the ice time required.

Probably can't fit both in unless Debrusk walks.

Lindholm
Coyle/Stephenson
Stephenson/Coyle
Beecher

That looks far better than the current day centre group.

This was always a transition year for the Bruins and although its not officially over, well it looks over.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: zaYG

Absurdity

light switch connoisseur
Jul 6, 2012
10,990
7,231
Sure he's been poor, I don't think anyone will dispute that. But find me a guy whose going to give you 50+ points for what he makes as a FA. You probably aren't.

He's not someone I'm looking to deal just to deal.
I think he should be moved in the right deal. If no one is offering anything good, then keep him.
 

stungun54

Registered User
Apr 15, 2018
554
529
HFBoards since 2000
He can score points during the regular season all he wants. His actions speak louder than his words this playoff run, and he has been a complete dud.
absolutely. we need to purge the no heart players. I add Lindholm and Coyle to this group to. Zacha Coyle Lindholm should be moved and replaced with younger players or free agents. Its amazing how weak willed this team is compared to the Bertuzzi Hathaway Orlov additions last year. Those players have the drive to win. This team seems to generally not care that they will be golfing on Wed. could care less about regular season stats if you turtle in the playoffs its time this franchise realized that.
 
  • Love
Reactions: Fenian24

Oates2Neely

Registered User
Jan 19, 2010
19,579
13,901
Massachusetts
Our favorite hockey teams matched up with their equals (wins/ points %) in the other 3 major sports:
 

Attachments

  • IMG_5596.jpeg
    IMG_5596.jpeg
    486 KB · Views: 3
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad