2024-25 HFBoards Yahoo Fantasy Premier Keeper League - Draft Sun Sept 29th 6pm PST

[Canucks LB]

Trade to announce:
To LB: Kreider
To BrockH: LB’s 4th

Confirmed

 

[CRDragon]

I am not sure if he checks this thread...
But CaptainBo still needs to drop Norris.
He just made a series of moves today.

@CaptainBo

 

[Canucks LB]

Ehlers and Tom Wilson are both back! The moments I have been waiting for!

Especially Tom, Made that trade early gambling i would be in the running

 

[Canucks LB]

Q: Whats the rules on draft picks trading? Is there a cap?

I still Need 1 more D and C upgrade.

 

[StrictlyCommercial]

Q: Whats the rules on draft picks trading? Is there a cap?

I still Need 1 more D and C upgrade.

No cap, you just need to trade picks 1 for 1.

 

[Canucks LB]

Alrighty, well, if you are looking for a draft picks, I am still looking for significant upgrades for my center, and D position.

Pics are usually harder to get as the season goes on, so this is a good opportunity for people, just send me offers

 

[StrictlyCommercial]

Alrighty, well, if you are looking for a draft picks, I am still looking for significant upgrades for my center, and D position.

Pics are usually harder to get as the season goes on, so this is a good opportunity for people, just send me offers

Kadri
Erikson Ek
Chabot
Romanov (hits and blocks)

Are all available.

 

[BrockH]

No cap, you just need to trade picks 1 for 1.

Going from memory I think you’re supposed to keep 3 of your top 6 to maintain long term competitiveness? CBA should address it though.

 

[nameless1]

Going from memory I think you’re supposed to keep 3 of your top 6 to maintain long term competitiveness? CBA should address it though.

So does that mean your trade is void?

 

[BrockH]

So does that mean your trade is void?

I checked:
1) It's 2 of first 5 rounds, not 3 of 6.
2) It's discretionary, and the 2 of 5 is an example.

If someone wants to make the argument that Luc is ruining his long-term prospects they could? I think the intent of this rule is that we don't want someone going all in if they:
1) Know they are walking away from at seasons end, or
2) Will want to walk away from the team as a result of the lack of long-term prospects.

Personally, I'm not really worried about (2) at all with Luc. As for (1), I'd be satisfied if he said he was committed beyond this season. That's just me personally though, so others are welcome to voice their concerns.

Here's the clause:
"Teams must trade and behave in good faith with a balanced perspective for both short and long-term
success. While ‘buying’ for a playoff run is permitted, it should not be done to the long-term detriment of
competitive hope in future years. For example, should a team trade away picks and put themselves in a
position during the regular season whereby they have fewer than 2 picks in the first 5 rounds, this would (at
the tribunal’s discretion – exceptions are possible if circumstances dictate it) be considered trading in poor
faith (i.e. detrimental to the team’s long term prospects). Any trade that puts a team in such a weakened
long-term position would be reviewable and may be vetoed by the tribunal. Additional sanctions may be
imposed as deemed necessary by the tribunal."

 

[VanillaCoke]

Agree with Big Brock Boss on this one

 

[Canucks LB]

I’m trading in good faith, when was the last time I went all in like this?

I believe it’s the first time I have ever done it, I don’t plan to leave at the end of the season.

 

[CRDragon]

I’m trading in good faith, when was the last time I went all in like this?

I believe it’s the first time I have ever done it, I don’t plan to leave at the end of the season.

Thanks for confirming this. I have no issues with it. And thanks BrockH for looking into it.

 

[Canucks LB]

I had 51 points this week, and still gonna lose, which is pretty funny

Nice match @CRDragon That was fun!

 

[nameless1]

No problem from me.
My comment was just in jest.

 

[CRDragon]

I had 51 points this week, and still gonna lose, which is pretty funny

Nice match @CRDragon That was fun!

Tough week to be cold offensively, great match! @Canucks LB !

 

[ArtursSilovsShirt]

Oh sorry boys! You're right I don't check the board that often haha. I'll drop Norris, didn't realize he was on LTIR or anything like that.

 

[nameless1]

Perhaps we should also post on the yahoo message board when we put someone on LTIR?
That way...
It will be hard to miss.

 

[ArtursSilovsShirt]

Perhaps we should also post on the yahoo message board when we put someone on LTIR?
That way...
It will be hard to miss.

Yea I mean I probably would have missed that too since I wasn't really thinking about it at all when I grabbed him, but I still think that's a decent idea. Easy place to see them all especially later in the season when more guys get dropped.

 

[y2kcanucks]

Nice to see the league I created still going.

 

[CRDragon]

Nice to see the league I created still going.

The one where everyone kicked you out?

 

[Canucks LB]

The one where everyone kicked you out?

Damn

 

[nameless1]

CRD holds a grudge.
Noted.

Kadri
Erikson Ek
Chabot
Romanov (hits and blocks)

Are all available.

I see you dropped Gibson.
Wise decision.

 

[CRDragon]

CRD holds a grudge.
Noted.

I should clarify there wasn't a grudge to hold. The collective people who managed the league after that second year was the right call. You still have those guys around, Balls, BrockH, Luc, Captain Bo, who can attest too that if I recall correctly. If we never did that, I'm pretty sure this league wouldn't still be existing.

 

[Canucker]

CRD holds a grudge.
Noted.




I see you dropped Gibson.
Wise decision.

At this rate i might have to pick him up as an upgrade. Lol