Speculation: 2024-25 - Free Agency/Trade Thread

GermanRocket7

Coach Cronin's Clueless Clusterf***
Sponsor
Nov 7, 2008
1,490
1,841
Düsseldorf
I wouldn't trade Zellweger unless it were for an absolute overpayment. Zellweger is probably the next batch of defensemen in the mold of Makar or Quinn Hughes, and if he were playing on a team more talented and further down the road in their rebuild (or even a contender), would he be a Norris candidate in the eyes of many experts.

The kid is our best bet at a reliable 60 point defenseman since our Cup in '07 and should by no means be given away for someone like Power, who already is on the verge of being labeled a bust (for a 1st overall pick, at least).

If I were to part ways with Zellweger, would I want to get back a bonafide #1 defenseman who is maybe 3-4 years older. The only actual player fitting that description and being even remotely available (95% chance he isn't), is Seider. Detroit will have to make radical changes after this season, as they are now 10 years out of the playoffs IIRC and seem not to be able to find their next gear time and again.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Son of Gib

Der Jaeger

Generational EBUG
Feb 14, 2009
18,331
15,277
Cair Paravel
Too high of an expectation from Mac this season. He was a ppg player during two long stretches last year in a 20-game set and a 7-game set, but also oft injured last year. This year, we were expecting him to take the next step in his progression, but he is just as 0.50 ppg player to this point. A few of those points have come in garbage time.

I believe head coach Cronin has stunted all of our youth forwards. I also believe that Mac is a good soldier who tries to appease his head coach. In following what the head coach wants, it has left Mac looking out of place often. Coach Cronin wants Mac to play like Tkachuk, but Mac doesn't play that constant physical style; Mac is more optimal as a transition offensive mind than a constant physical dump-and-chase player like Tkuchuk.

Proof of misuse of our youth forwards is that none of them have taken a lift-off the past two seasons save Mac last year. We can use Zegras as the control group since he played before coach Cronin got here. Before Cronin arrived, Zegras had scored over 60 points and 23 goals in each of his first two full seasons with the Ducks. With Cronin... a dud and made out of glass.


Our top youth forwards are Carlsson, Gauthier, McTavish, and Zegras. Our youth defensemen are Helleson, LaCombe, Mintyukov, and Zellweger. Our youth d-men are scoring similarly to our youth forwards. It is scary and disappointing when a youth defenseman is a better goal scorer than three out of the four youth forwards.




The league average for GF and GA is 105 goals. The Ducks GF is 80 goals, or 25 fewer goals than the average and the league's worst GF production. The Ducks' GA is 102 goals allowed, or 3 goals allowed better than the average. This is why I don't think the Ducks need to move any forward youths until we have a new head coach with an offensive mind. Hell, we called up our best scoring youth forward from the AHL in Sam Colangelo and made him into a 4th line checker for eight NHL games without a sniff in the top-6 despite needing more scoring.
Great post thank you
I wouldn't trade Zellweger unless it were for an absolute overpayment. Zellweger is probably the next batch of defensemen in the mold of Makar or Quinn Hughes, and if he were playing on a team more talented and further down the road in their rebuild (or even a contender), would he be a Norris candidate in the eyes of many experts.

The kid is our best bet at a reliable 60 point defenseman since our Cup in '07 and should by no means be given away for someone like Power, who already is on the verge of being labeled a bust (for a 1st overall pick, at least).

If I were to part ways with Zellweger, would I want to get back a bonafide #1 defenseman who is maybe 3-4 years older. The only actual player fitting that description and being even remotely available (95% chance he isn't), is Seider. Detroit will have to make radical changes after this season, as they are now 10 years out of the playoffs IIRC and seem not to be able to find their next gear time and again.
I wouldn’t say Power is approaching bust status. He needs to be a 1D and he’s playing second fiddle to Dahlin. So he’s getting PP scraps and having to play tougher defensive minutes. In the same way McTavish was described above as being miscast, Power is in the same situation.

I think with teams playing the 1-3-1 on the power play, teams really only have room for one true 1D. I wanted the Sabres to take Beniers but that ship sailed. But I don’t think Power is close to a bust especially with how long it takes for D to develop.
 

FlyingV09

Registered User
Jun 15, 2009
868
807
Alberta, Canada
The idea of giving up on Mason McTavish is painful to read. Have we not learned anything Ducks fans?

We’ve dealt Theodore, William Karlsson, Montour (just off the top of my head) before they were done ripening and ended up on the bad end of those deals. I know the circumstances of these trades were different and an argument could be made they wouldn’t have ever blossomed here, but I do think they were dealt before we knew what we had.

Look at Troy Terry. Had many rough years before he turned 24 then exploded into one of our most important players.

Let these guys develop. Under a new coach we could see them turn into the players we expected them to be. It’s hard to be patient but I think that is what is required here.
 

Mr Rogers

Registered User
Jul 11, 2010
21,212
10,884
Calgary
The idea of giving up on Mason McTavish is painful to read. Have we not learned anything Ducks fans?

We’ve dealt Theodore, William Karlsson, Montour (just off the top of my head) before they were done ripening and ended up on the bad end of those deals. I know the circumstances of these trades were different and an argument could be made they wouldn’t have ever blossomed here, but I do think they were dealt before we knew what we had.

Look at Troy Terry. Had many rough years before he turned 24 then exploded into one of our most important players.

Let these guys develop. Under a new coach we could see them turn into the players we expected them to be. It’s hard to be patient but I think that is what is required here.
The frequent lamenting over his play this year and newly his hockey IQ is pretty annoying to read.

He hasn’t been great this year but the only forward who’s been “good” is Terry. Why is it the coach’s/linemate’s fault for them but for McTavish it’s his hockey IQ? He could very well finish 2nd on team in points this year too, would love to see that.
 

Rasp

Registered User
Apr 9, 2019
1,354
1,948
If we are trading for Power based on his potential being a 1D then the pieces we trade should be valued at their potential too. I wouldn't be giving up 2 of our core young players for him.

Like other people have said trading our kids now could be a massive mistake as the common denominator for their poor development is Cronin. Lets see how well they go with a new coach first.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kalv and Boo Boo

JAHV

Registered User
Sponsor
Oct 3, 2023
1,446
2,289
Anaheim, CA
The frequent lamenting over his play this year and newly his hockey IQ is pretty annoying to read.

He hasn’t been great this year but the only forward who’s been “good” is Terry. Why is it the coach’s/linemate’s fault for them but for McTavish it’s his hockey IQ? He could very well finish 2nd on team in points this year too, would love to see that.
I actually don't think his hockey IQ has been his biggest problem. I don't see any difference there. The issue I've seen is he's consistently not making plays that a player of his caliber should make - handling passes, getting shots away, staying on his feet when he's skating. The biggest red flag for me is that these are plays he's made in the past. He's taken a step BACK.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Frosted Tips

duckpuck

Registered User
Sponsor
Jul 10, 2007
2,626
2,766
If Elias Pettersson is available, the ducks should be all in on him. I think any player other than Carlsson should be made available.

I actually don't think his hockey IQ has been his biggest problem. I don't see any difference there. The issue I've seen is he's consistently not making plays that a player of his caliber should make - handling passes, getting shots away, staying on his feet when he's skating. The biggest red flag for me is that these are plays he's made in the past. He's taken a step BACK.
I see the same thing. For a player who is regarded is having a good shot, he fumbles/mishandles the puck way too often and makes a lot of questionable passes (which applies to many ducks).
 
  • Like
Reactions: DuckRogers10

ScarTroy

Registered User
Sponsor
May 24, 2012
3,397
3,302
Corona, CA
If Elias Pettersson is available, the ducks should be all in on him. I think any player other than Carlsson should be made available.


I see the same thing. For a player who is regarded is having a good shot, he fumbles/mishandles the puck way too often and makes a lot of questionable passes (which applies to many ducks).
Didn’t he just extend? Why would they get rid of him?
 

Hamilton Bulldogs

Registered User
Jan 11, 2022
4,394
6,235
The idea of giving up on Mason McTavish is painful to read. Have we not learned anything Ducks fans?

We’ve dealt Theodore, William Karlsson, Montour (just off the top of my head) before they were done ripening and ended up on the bad end of those deals. I know the circumstances of these trades were different and an argument could be made they wouldn’t have ever blossomed here, but I do think they were dealt before we knew what we had.

Look at Troy Terry. Had many rough years before he turned 24 then exploded into one of our most important players.

Let these guys develop. Under a new coach we could see them turn into the players we expected them to be. It’s hard to be patient but I think that is what is required here.
The idea of giving up on anyone under 25 for the Ducks is insane to me.

The current team is a mess on offence. It's not just one player, its not just two players. It's not just one line. Every single forward looks completely lost when they enter the offensive zone. There's just zero chemistry all around. Its just a bunch of individuals hoping for the best with no cohesive plan. The only time the offence has looked dangerous is when Zel or Lacombe say screw it and do their best Bobby Orr impersonation/

Every game I watch on the visiting broadcast they always suggest that a current player is struggling this year and what a big surprise it is. One week it's Zegras, the next it's McTavish and more recently it's been Leo. I just don't see how anyone can really gauge what the Ducks have in this system on the forward side of things. I find it hard to believe that trading any of these players will make a difference. I would fully expect Elias Pettersson to be completely ineffective in Anaheim because almost everyone else has for the past 5 years.
 

Hockey Duckie

Registered User
Jul 25, 2003
19,422
14,680
southern cal
Great post thank you

I wouldn’t say Power is approaching bust status. He needs to be a 1D and he’s playing second fiddle to Dahlin. So he’s getting PP scraps and having to play tougher defensive minutes. In the same way McTavish was described above as being miscast, Power is in the same situation.

I think with teams playing the 1-3-1 on the power play, teams really only have room for one true 1D. I wanted the Sabres to take Beniers but that ship sailed. But I don’t think Power is close to a bust especially with how long it takes for D to develop.

I haven't paid much attn to Power since his draft, but I thought he was projected as a shutdown d-man with potential offense. That he was someone who can tilt the ice and be dominantly physical, especially with his stature. Power is an eager shot blocker, but not a hitter. Dahlin tilts the ice more and is more physical the Power. Byram hits more than Power.

As for tougher defensive minutes, I don't think Power has had the pleasure of playing under Cronin as a youth. The highest DZone Start% for Power is 48.8% last season and this season is 48.1%. Last year, LaCombe's DZone Start% was 55.8%. This year, Minty's DZone Start% is 63.2%.

1735157883168.png


I'm becoming less enamored with Power. Power is being paid $8.350 mil AAV until 2031. LaCombe is being paid $0.925 mil AAV until 2026. Ever since Fowler was traded to St. Louis weeks ago, LaCombe has been playing as a top-pairing guy and our default #1D. And I don't think LaCombe will cost anywhere near $8 mil to be extended.
 

Dr Johnny Fever

RIP Grizzly 399
Apr 11, 2012
22,293
7,382
Lower Left Coast
The idea of giving up on anyone under 25 for the Ducks is insane to me.

The current team is a mess on offence. It's not just one player, its not just two players. It's not just one line. Every single forward looks completely lost when they enter the offensive zone. There's just zero chemistry all around. Its just a bunch of individuals hoping for the best with no cohesive plan. The only time the offence has looked dangerous is when Zel or Lacombe say screw it and do their best Bobby Orr impersonation/

Every game I watch on the visiting broadcast they always suggest that a current player is struggling this year and what a big surprise it is. One week it's Zegras, the next it's McTavish and more recently it's been Leo. I just don't see how anyone can really gauge what the Ducks have in this system on the forward side of things. I find it hard to believe that trading any of these players will make a difference. I would fully expect Elias Pettersson to be completely ineffective in Anaheim because almost everyone else has for the past 5 years.
This exactly! Put Bedard on this team and he’d be a mess too.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hamilton Bulldogs

Kalv

Slava Ukraini
Mar 29, 2009
24,284
12,378
Latvia
The idea of giving up on anyone under 25 for the Ducks is insane to me.

The current team is a mess on offence. It's not just one player, its not just two players. It's not just one line. Every single forward looks completely lost when they enter the offensive zone. There's just zero chemistry all around. Its just a bunch of individuals hoping for the best with no cohesive plan. The only time the offence has looked dangerous is when Zel or Lacombe say screw it and do their best Bobby Orr impersonation/

Every game I watch on the visiting broadcast they always suggest that a current player is struggling this year and what a big surprise it is. One week it's Zegras, the next it's McTavish and more recently it's been Leo. I just don't see how anyone can really gauge what the Ducks have in this system on the forward side of things. I find it hard to believe that trading any of these players will make a difference. I would fully expect Elias Pettersson to be completely ineffective in Anaheim because almost everyone else has for the past 5 years.
Also, the Killorn(?) comments supports this, imo. That no one knows where other guys are. That is not how an NHL team should be. And as you say, it diminishes player talent

My worry is, lost development time while our young stars are learning how to be effective 4th liners
 

ScarTroy

Registered User
Sponsor
May 24, 2012
3,397
3,302
Corona, CA
Look at his splits before and after his extension. A few days ago it was posted that he went from 1.25ppg to .72ppg.

Can't rule out the possibility that his big year was an outlier.
His career ppg of over 400 games is over 1.00 ppg. I think we can infer what might be the outlier.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Boo Boo

FiveTacos

Registered User
Oct 2, 2017
1,183
1,996
The Twilight Zone
His career ppg of over 400 games is over 1.00 ppg. I think we can infer what might be the outlier.

Probably. But you'd have to think if they were absolutely sure about that, any idea of trading him wouldn't even be considered by them.

I know they blamed tendinitis for his dip last year. But what if it's chronic?
 

All Mighty

Registered User
Sep 20, 2014
12,460
20,165
California
allmightyhockeytalk.com
His career ppg of over 400 games is over 1.00 ppg. I think we can infer what might be the outlier.

Probably. But you'd have to think if they were absolutely sure about that, any idea of trading him wouldn't even be considered by them.

I know they blamed tendinitis for his dip last year. But what if it's chronic?
Could just be a coincidence, but in the 10 games Miller missed recently, Pettersson had 15 points. In the 7 games since Miller came back, Pettersson has 2 points. Pettersson’s ice time has gone down slightly, but the point differential is quite drastic.
 

DavidBL

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jul 25, 2012
6,309
4,344
Orange, CA
Could just be a coincidence, but in the 10 games Miller missed recently, Pettersson had 15 points. In the 7 games since Miller came back, Pettersson has 2 points. Pettersson’s ice time has gone down slightly, but the point differential is quite drastic.
Did his linemates change?
 

Boo Boo

Registered User
Jan 31, 2013
2,481
2,789
Also vancouverite - would love pettersson but the contract is just a little too rich for someone who can be high maintenance maintenance

I would however be overjoyed if really any of our young players could dominate stretches like he can
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad