tomd
Registered User
Kakko's QO this off-season is $2.4 million. That might have been a little rich for Verbeek.
Last edited:
Maybe Trouba was asked about kakko, and didn’t have glowing remarks about him.Probably not if he went that low and we recently traded with this team to get Trouba. Or maybe we were but Verbeek came to his senses about the kid's value.
They got back a 6’3” rhd, which they needed to address after Trouba. Adding another LHW probably wasn’t ideal w/ giving up assets to attain as well.Maybe Trouba was asked about kakko, and didn’t have glowing remarks about him.
We could have sent them helleson(we have luneau ready next season to make the jump). Again, it’s possible that Trouba didn’t speak highly of kakko. We just don’t know. Or maybe they didn’t want helleson .They got back a 6’3” rhd, which they needed to address after Trouba. Adding another LHW probably wasn’t ideal w/ giving up assets to attain as well.
Edit : and I was pro trading for him
Yes he very well could have spoke poorly of him, but really RHD is probably our weakest spot organizationally, obviously the RHW a close second. Trading one of our few prospects for a LHW (who plays RW) isn’t probably the best asset management. And like I said I was definitely pro trading for him.We could have sent them helleson(we have luneau ready next season to make the jump). Again, it’s possible that Trouba didn’t speak highly of kakko. We just don’t know. Or maybe they didn’t want helleson .
I don't think there's anything borderline about it, he's 100% a bust at this point.I just don’t get the infatuation with Kakko. He’s a borderline bust in my eyes at this point.
Yeah I have no irritation that we didn't beat that deal whatsoever. If he was this mediocre on the Rangers, I can't see how he would possibly turn it around under this coach. But I knew the gripes were coming.I just don’t get the infatuation with Kakko. He’s a borderline bust in my eyes at this point.